Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111 |
Resumo: | There were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic. |
id |
UFSC-5_9f4bb97ec092788166582dae5d3313f1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/22570 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and LinguisticsQuestions of Logic, Philosophy, and LinguisticsThere were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic.Houve no passado, e há no presente, tentativas várias, diversas entre si, de fundamentar uma posição única que acredita poder identificar em todas as línguas naturais uma estrutura básica, sempre idêntica, e de natureza lógica. Se assim for, há princípios que regem o funcionamento de tais línguas e esses princípios são oriundos da Lógica. Com base em um trabalho do linguista francês Oswald Ducrot, intitulado Sobre um mau uso da Lógica, a presente comunicação pretende apresentar resumidamente duas das mencionadas tentativas. Elas foram elaboradas em épocas diversas e são diferentes os argumentos destinados a sustentá-las. A primeira é originária do século XVII francês e o seu alicerce teórico é a célebre Lógica de Port-Royal. A segunda é recente e o seu fundamento teórico é a Lógica Contemporânea.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p11110.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011); 111-122Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2011); 111-122Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 15 n. 1 (2011); 111-1221808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111/20557Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannúsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves-Tannús, Marcio2019-09-12T10:54:10Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/22570Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-12T10:54:10Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
title |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
spellingShingle |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics Chaves-Tannús, Marcio |
title_short |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
title_full |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
title_fullStr |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
title_sort |
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics |
author |
Chaves-Tannús, Marcio |
author_facet |
Chaves-Tannús, Marcio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chaves-Tannús, Marcio |
description |
There were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111 10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111/20557 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannús info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannús |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011); 111-122 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2011); 111-122 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 15 n. 1 (2011); 111-122 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435111406567424 |