Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chaves-Tannús, Marcio
Data de Publicação: 2011
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111
Resumo: There were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic.
id UFSC-5_9f4bb97ec092788166582dae5d3313f1
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/22570
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and LinguisticsQuestions of Logic, Philosophy, and LinguisticsThere were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic.Houve no passado, e há no presente, tentativas várias, diversas entre si, de fundamentar uma posição única que acredita poder identificar em todas as línguas naturais uma estrutura básica, sempre idêntica, e de natureza lógica. Se assim for, há princípios que regem o funcionamento de tais línguas e esses princípios são oriundos da Lógica. Com base em um trabalho do linguista francês Oswald Ducrot, intitulado Sobre um mau uso da Lógica, a presente comunicação pretende apresentar resumidamente duas das mencionadas tentativas. Elas foram elaboradas em épocas diversas e são diferentes os argumentos destinados a sustentá-las. A primeira é originária do século XVII francês e o seu alicerce teórico é a célebre Lógica de Port-Royal. A segunda é recente e o seu fundamento teórico é a Lógica Contemporânea.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p11110.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011); 111-122Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2011); 111-122Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 15 n. 1 (2011); 111-1221808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111/20557Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannúsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves-Tannús, Marcio2019-09-12T10:54:10Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/22570Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-12T10:54:10Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
title Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
spellingShingle Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
Chaves-Tannús, Marcio
title_short Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
title_full Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
title_fullStr Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
title_sort Questions of Logic, Philosophy, and Linguistics
author Chaves-Tannús, Marcio
author_facet Chaves-Tannús, Marcio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chaves-Tannús, Marcio
description There were in the past, just as there are in the present, several diverse attempts to establish a unique theory capable of identifying in all natural languages a similar, invariable basic structure of a logical nature. If such a theory exists, then there must be principles that rule the functioning of these languages and they must have a logical origin. Based on a work by the French linguist, Oswald Ducrot, entitled D’un mauvais usage de la logique, this paper aims to present in a concise manner two of the above mentioned attempts. They were elaborated in diverse epochs and different arguments were put forward to support them. The first attempt was in XVII century France and its theoretic basis was the renowned ‘Port-Royal Logic’. The second attempt is recent and its theoretic support comes from Contemporary Logic.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111
10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2011v15n1p111/20557
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannús
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marcio Chaves-Tannús
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2011); 111-122
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2011); 111-122
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 15 n. 1 (2011); 111-122
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435111406567424