Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 |
Resumo: | The understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability. |
id |
UFSC-5_b09733c6c20adb8916e6dd19d5f14cb5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/43055 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitualPutnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitualThe understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability.A caracterização da relatividade conceitual em Putnam e em Kuhn não deve restringir-se à afirmação de que a existência de objetos é relativa a um esquema conceitual, mas não se dá em virtude dele. Isso não captura diferenças relevantes entre suas formulações. Entendemos que a tese da relatividade conceitual contém uma afirmação sobre a estreita relação entre esquema conceitual e conteúdo, e outra sobre as diferenças entre esquemas conceituais. Depois de propor uma reconstrução de cada uma delas, defenderemos que, embora ambas cumpram um papel crítico contra o realismo metafísico, a formulação de Putnam evita o relativismo cognitivo quanto à compreensão, que decorre da incomensurabilidade semântica de Kuhn. Argumentaremos que elas se aplicam a domínios distintos: enquanto a relatividade conceitual de Putnam se põe no registro da estrutura das teorias científicas, Kuhn considera sua tese no domínio da dinâmica do desenvolvimento da ciência. Desse modo, notaremos que apenas Kuhn pode admitir ambas as formulações e que o compromisso de Putnam com o realismo é incompatível com a incomensurabilidade semântica, um dos componentes da tese da relatividade conceitual kuhniana.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2016-05-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p28510.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016); 285-314Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2016); 285-314Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 2 (2016); 285-3141808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285/33479Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrariinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuitarrari, Robinson2019-09-13T10:51:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/43055Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T10:51:08Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
title |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
spellingShingle |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual Guitarrari, Robinson |
title_short |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
title_full |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
title_fullStr |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
title_full_unstemmed |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
title_sort |
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual |
author |
Guitarrari, Robinson |
author_facet |
Guitarrari, Robinson |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guitarrari, Robinson |
description |
The understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285/33479 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrari info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrari |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016); 285-314 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2016); 285-314 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 2 (2016); 285-314 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435112607186944 |