Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guitarrari, Robinson
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285
Resumo: The understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability.
id UFSC-5_b09733c6c20adb8916e6dd19d5f14cb5
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/43055
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitualPutnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitualThe understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability.A caracterização da relatividade conceitual em Putnam e em Kuhn não deve restringir-se à afirmação de que a existência de objetos é relativa a um esquema conceitual, mas não se dá em virtude dele. Isso não captura diferenças relevantes entre suas formulações. Entendemos que a tese da relatividade conceitual contém uma afirmação sobre a estreita relação entre esquema conceitual e conteúdo, e outra sobre as diferenças entre esquemas conceituais. Depois de propor uma reconstrução de cada uma delas, defenderemos que, embora ambas cumpram um papel crítico contra o realismo metafísico, a formulação de Putnam evita o relativismo cognitivo quanto à compreensão, que decorre da incomensurabilidade semântica de Kuhn. Argumentaremos que elas se aplicam a domínios distintos: enquanto a relatividade conceitual de Putnam se põe no registro da estrutura das teorias científicas, Kuhn considera sua tese no domínio da dinâmica do desenvolvimento da ciência. Desse modo, notaremos que apenas Kuhn pode admitir ambas as formulações e que o compromisso de Putnam com o realismo é incompatível com a incomensurabilidade semântica, um dos componentes da tese da relatividade conceitual kuhniana.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2016-05-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p28510.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016); 285-314Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2016); 285-314Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 2 (2016); 285-3141808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285/33479Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrariinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuitarrari, Robinson2019-09-13T10:51:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/43055Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T10:51:08Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
title Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
spellingShingle Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
Guitarrari, Robinson
title_short Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
title_full Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
title_fullStr Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
title_full_unstemmed Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
title_sort Putnam, Kuhn e a relatividade conceitual
author Guitarrari, Robinson
author_facet Guitarrari, Robinson
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guitarrari, Robinson
description The understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285
10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285/33479
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrari
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Robinson Guitarrari
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2016); 285-314
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2016); 285-314
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 2 (2016); 285-314
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435112607186944