Content, object, and phenomenal character

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Marco Aurélio Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417
Resumo: The view that perceptual experience has representational content, or the content view, has recently been criticized by the defenders of the so-called object view. Part of the dispute, I claim here, is based on a lack of grasp of the notion of content. There is, however, a core of substantial disagreement. Once the substantial core is revealed, I aim to: (1) reject the arguments raised against the content view by Campbell (2002), Travis (2004), and Brewer (2006); (2) criticize Brewer’s (2006, 2007, 2008, 2011) attempts to defend the object view; (3) refine Pautz’ (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011) arguments against the object view, which mainly resort to the fact that it cannot account for the grounding role of hallucinatory experiences; (4) and finally adjudicate in favor of the content view and against the overestimation of the naïve intuition.
id UFSC-5_b4623843648275268a9b984bfa5b4c1e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28306
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Content, object, and phenomenal characterContent, Object, and Phenomenal CharacterThe view that perceptual experience has representational content, or the content view, has recently been criticized by the defenders of the so-called object view. Part of the dispute, I claim here, is based on a lack of grasp of the notion of content. There is, however, a core of substantial disagreement. Once the substantial core is revealed, I aim to: (1) reject the arguments raised against the content view by Campbell (2002), Travis (2004), and Brewer (2006); (2) criticize Brewer’s (2006, 2007, 2008, 2011) attempts to defend the object view; (3) refine Pautz’ (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011) arguments against the object view, which mainly resort to the fact that it cannot account for the grounding role of hallucinatory experiences; (4) and finally adjudicate in favor of the content view and against the overestimation of the naïve intuition.A tese de que experiências perceptivas possuem conteúdo representacional, ou a teoria do conteúdo, tem sido alvo dos defensores da chamada teoria do objeto. Parte da disputa, conforme argumento nesse artigo, apóia-se na incompreensão da noção de conteúdo. Mas esse desacordo deve-se também, em parte, a questões substanciais. Uma vez que o núcleo substancial da disputa é trazido à tona, pretendo aqui: (1) rejeitar os argumentos levantados contra a teoria do conteúdo por Campbell (2002), Travis (2004) e Brewer (2006); (2) criticar as tentativas de Brewer (2006, 2007, 2008, 2011) de defender a teoria do objeto; (3) refinar os argumentos de Pautz (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011) contra a teoria do objeto, que apelam principalmente para o fato dela não conseguir explicar o papel fundacional das experiências alucinatórias; (4) e finalmente julgar a questão a favor da teoria do conteúdo e contra a superestimação da intuição ingênua.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2012-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p41710.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 417-449Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 417-449Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 417-4491808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417/25612Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Aurélio Sousa Alvesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Marco Aurélio Sousa2019-09-13T08:40:19Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/28306Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T08:40:19Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content, object, and phenomenal character
Content, Object, and Phenomenal Character
title Content, object, and phenomenal character
spellingShingle Content, object, and phenomenal character
Alves, Marco Aurélio Sousa
title_short Content, object, and phenomenal character
title_full Content, object, and phenomenal character
title_fullStr Content, object, and phenomenal character
title_full_unstemmed Content, object, and phenomenal character
title_sort Content, object, and phenomenal character
author Alves, Marco Aurélio Sousa
author_facet Alves, Marco Aurélio Sousa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Marco Aurélio Sousa
description The view that perceptual experience has representational content, or the content view, has recently been criticized by the defenders of the so-called object view. Part of the dispute, I claim here, is based on a lack of grasp of the notion of content. There is, however, a core of substantial disagreement. Once the substantial core is revealed, I aim to: (1) reject the arguments raised against the content view by Campbell (2002), Travis (2004), and Brewer (2006); (2) criticize Brewer’s (2006, 2007, 2008, 2011) attempts to defend the object view; (3) refine Pautz’ (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011) arguments against the object view, which mainly resort to the fact that it cannot account for the grounding role of hallucinatory experiences; (4) and finally adjudicate in favor of the content view and against the overestimation of the naïve intuition.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417
10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2012v16n3p417/25612
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Aurélio Sousa Alves
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marco Aurélio Sousa Alves
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2012); 417-449
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 16 Núm. 3 (2012); 417-449
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 16 n. 3 (2012); 417-449
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435112524349440