Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175 |
Resumo: | In this essay, we intend to show that Peter Klein and Marshall Swain defeasibility theories do not resolve the Gettier problem. Klein postulates, to any Gettier counterexample, that there is a true proposition which, when associated with evidence-e of S, genuinely defeats the justification of p to S. Swain postulates that, to any Gettier-type counterexample, there is a true proposition which, when associated with the set of reasons-R of S, ultimately defeats the justification of S to believe p. To show that Klein an Swain proposals do not resolve that problem, this essay presents two Gettier-type counterexamples for which there are no genuine defeaters of justification of p by e to S and there are no defeaters not ultimately defeated of the justification of the belief of S that p by R. After doing that, we try to show that the obtained conclusion regarding Klein and Swain defeasibility theories can be extended to any defeasibility theory of knowledge. |
id |
UFSC-5_b985b7256e3ade591107eadad864150f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19650 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de GettierOs anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de GettierIn this essay, we intend to show that Peter Klein and Marshall Swain defeasibility theories do not resolve the Gettier problem. Klein postulates, to any Gettier counterexample, that there is a true proposition which, when associated with evidence-e of S, genuinely defeats the justification of p to S. Swain postulates that, to any Gettier-type counterexample, there is a true proposition which, when associated with the set of reasons-R of S, ultimately defeats the justification of S to believe p. To show that Klein an Swain proposals do not resolve that problem, this essay presents two Gettier-type counterexamples for which there are no genuine defeaters of justification of p by e to S and there are no defeaters not ultimately defeated of the justification of the belief of S that p by R. After doing that, we try to show that the obtained conclusion regarding Klein and Swain defeasibility theories can be extended to any defeasibility theory of knowledge.Nós tentamos mostrar neste ensaio que as propostas anulabilistas de Peter Klein e de Marshall Swain não resolvem o problema de Gettier. Klein postula que, para qualquer contra-exemplo de tipo-Gettier, há uma proposição verdadeira que, ao ser conjugada com a evidência e de S, anula de modo legítimo a justificação de p para S. Swain postula que, para qualquer contra-exemplo de tipo-Gettier, há uma proposição verdadeira que, ao ser conjugada com o conjunto de razões R de S, anula de modo ulterior a justificação de S para crer que p. Para provarmos que essas propostas não resolvem aquele problema, apresentamos dois contra-exemplos de tipo-Gettier para os quais não há anuladores legítimos da justificação de p por e para S, nem anuladores da justificação da crença de S de que p por R que não sejam ulteriormente anulados. Após a discussão em torno dos anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain, tentamos mostrar que as conclusões nela obtidas podem ser corretamente aplicadas a qualquer proposta anulabilista de conhecimento.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2010-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p17510.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 175-200Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-200Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 175-2001808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175/17950Copyright (c) 2021 Emerson Carlos Valcarenghiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValcarenghi, Emerson Carlos2020-01-22T08:50:26Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/19650Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2020-01-22T08:50:26Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
title |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
spellingShingle |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier Valcarenghi, Emerson Carlos |
title_short |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
title_full |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
title_fullStr |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
title_full_unstemmed |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
title_sort |
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier |
author |
Valcarenghi, Emerson Carlos |
author_facet |
Valcarenghi, Emerson Carlos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valcarenghi, Emerson Carlos |
description |
In this essay, we intend to show that Peter Klein and Marshall Swain defeasibility theories do not resolve the Gettier problem. Klein postulates, to any Gettier counterexample, that there is a true proposition which, when associated with evidence-e of S, genuinely defeats the justification of p to S. Swain postulates that, to any Gettier-type counterexample, there is a true proposition which, when associated with the set of reasons-R of S, ultimately defeats the justification of S to believe p. To show that Klein an Swain proposals do not resolve that problem, this essay presents two Gettier-type counterexamples for which there are no genuine defeaters of justification of p by e to S and there are no defeaters not ultimately defeated of the justification of the belief of S that p by R. After doing that, we try to show that the obtained conclusion regarding Klein and Swain defeasibility theories can be extended to any defeasibility theory of knowledge. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-05-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175 10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p175/17950 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Emerson Carlos Valcarenghi info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Emerson Carlos Valcarenghi |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2010); 175-200 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2010); 175-200 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 14 n. 2 (2010); 175-200 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435111309049856 |