Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bueno, Otávio
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Krause, Décio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/16488
Resumo: According to the semantic view, a theory is characterized by a class of models. In this paper, we examine critically some of the assumptions that underlie this approach. First, we recall that models are models of something. Thus we cannot leave completely aside the axiomatization of the theories under consideration, nor can we ignore the metamathematics used to elaborate these models, for changes in the metamathematics often impose restrictions on the resulting models. Second, based on a parallel between van Fraassen’s modal interpretationof quantum mechanics and Skolem’s relativism regarding set-theoretic concepts, we introduce a distinction between relative and absolute concepts in the context of the models of a scientific theory. And we discuss the significance of that distinction. Finally, by focusing on contemporary particle physics, we raise the question: since there is no general accepted unification of the parts of the standard model (namely, QED and QCD), we have no theory, in the usual sense of the term. This poses a difficulty: if there is no theory, how can we speak of its models? What are the latter models of? We conclude by noting that it is unclear that the semantic view can be applied to contemporary physical theories.
id UFSC-5_be26a05e2c7e4876fbf4938c428da616
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/16488
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic ApproachAccording to the semantic view, a theory is characterized by a class of models. In this paper, we examine critically some of the assumptions that underlie this approach. First, we recall that models are models of something. Thus we cannot leave completely aside the axiomatization of the theories under consideration, nor can we ignore the metamathematics used to elaborate these models, for changes in the metamathematics often impose restrictions on the resulting models. Second, based on a parallel between van Fraassen’s modal interpretationof quantum mechanics and Skolem’s relativism regarding set-theoretic concepts, we introduce a distinction between relative and absolute concepts in the context of the models of a scientific theory. And we discuss the significance of that distinction. Finally, by focusing on contemporary particle physics, we raise the question: since there is no general accepted unification of the parts of the standard model (namely, QED and QCD), we have no theory, in the usual sense of the term. This poses a difficulty: if there is no theory, how can we speak of its models? What are the latter models of? We conclude by noting that it is unclear that the semantic view can be applied to contemporary physical theories.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1648810.5007/%xPrincipia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2007); 187-201Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2007); 187-201Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 11 n. 2 (2007); 187-2011808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/16488/15051Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Bueno, Décio Krausehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno, OtávioKrause, Décio2016-01-02T12:13:50Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/16488Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2016-01-02T12:13:50Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
title Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
spellingShingle Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
Bueno, Otávio
title_short Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
title_full Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
title_fullStr Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
title_sort Scientific Theories, Models, and the Semantic Approach
author Bueno, Otávio
author_facet Bueno, Otávio
Krause, Décio
author_role author
author2 Krause, Décio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bueno, Otávio
Krause, Décio
description According to the semantic view, a theory is characterized by a class of models. In this paper, we examine critically some of the assumptions that underlie this approach. First, we recall that models are models of something. Thus we cannot leave completely aside the axiomatization of the theories under consideration, nor can we ignore the metamathematics used to elaborate these models, for changes in the metamathematics often impose restrictions on the resulting models. Second, based on a parallel between van Fraassen’s modal interpretationof quantum mechanics and Skolem’s relativism regarding set-theoretic concepts, we introduce a distinction between relative and absolute concepts in the context of the models of a scientific theory. And we discuss the significance of that distinction. Finally, by focusing on contemporary particle physics, we raise the question: since there is no general accepted unification of the parts of the standard model (namely, QED and QCD), we have no theory, in the usual sense of the term. This poses a difficulty: if there is no theory, how can we speak of its models? What are the latter models of? We conclude by noting that it is unclear that the semantic view can be applied to contemporary physical theories.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/16488
10.5007/%x
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/16488
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/%x
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/16488/15051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Bueno, Décio Krause
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Bueno, Décio Krause
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2007); 187-201
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2007); 187-201
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 11 n. 2 (2007); 187-201
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435110284591104