Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14791 |
Resumo: | This paper deals with the question whether science and philosophy are continuous, as Quine thought, or whether they are completely separated, as Wittgenstein held. Reconstructing the reasons why the latter kept a sharp distinction between science and philosophy, it examines the attempts of the former to resolve philosophical problems in scientific terms. It maintains that Quine’s scientism is misconceived and presents further reasons for making a distinction (if not a separation) between science and philosophy. |
id |
UFSC-5_d8735203be3416a4e5140071ac7f4155 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14791 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophiThis paper deals with the question whether science and philosophy are continuous, as Quine thought, or whether they are completely separated, as Wittgenstein held. Reconstructing the reasons why the latter kept a sharp distinction between science and philosophy, it examines the attempts of the former to resolve philosophical problems in scientific terms. It maintains that Quine’s scientism is misconceived and presents further reasons for making a distinction (if not a separation) between science and philosophy.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1479110.5007/%xPrincipia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 7 No. 1-2 (2003); 75-91Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 7 Núm. 1-2 (2003); 75-91Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 7 n. 1-2 (2003); 75-911808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14791/13504Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall' Agnolhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDall' Agnol, Darlei2016-01-02T12:16:55Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14791Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2016-01-02T12:16:55Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
title |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
spellingShingle |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi Dall' Agnol, Darlei |
title_short |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
title_full |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
title_fullStr |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
title_sort |
Quine or wittgenstein: the end of analytic philosophi |
author |
Dall' Agnol, Darlei |
author_facet |
Dall' Agnol, Darlei |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dall' Agnol, Darlei |
description |
This paper deals with the question whether science and philosophy are continuous, as Quine thought, or whether they are completely separated, as Wittgenstein held. Reconstructing the reasons why the latter kept a sharp distinction between science and philosophy, it examines the attempts of the former to resolve philosophical problems in scientific terms. It maintains that Quine’s scientism is misconceived and presents further reasons for making a distinction (if not a separation) between science and philosophy. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14791 10.5007/%x |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14791 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/%x |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14791/13504 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall' Agnol http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall' Agnol http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 7 No. 1-2 (2003); 75-91 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 7 Núm. 1-2 (2003); 75-91 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 7 n. 1-2 (2003); 75-91 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435110238453760 |