Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217 |
Resumo: | In this paper, I examine Putnam’s nuanced views in the philosophy of mathematics, distinguishing three proposals: modalism (an interpretation of mathematics in terms of modal logic), quasi-empirical realism (that emphasizes the role and use of quasi-empirical methods in mathematics), and an indispensability view (that highlights the indispensable role of quantification over mathematical objects and the support such quantification provides for a realist interpretation of mathematics). I argue that, as he shifted through these views, Putnam aimed to preserve a semantic realist account of mathematics that avoids platonism. In the end, however, each of the proposals faces significant difficulties. A form of skepticism then emerges |
id |
UFSC-5_e310cec5716ea1d8b9c63cbf2f4c5a43 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32342 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Putnam and the Indispensability of MathematicsPutnam and the Indispensability of MathematicsIn this paper, I examine Putnam’s nuanced views in the philosophy of mathematics, distinguishing three proposals: modalism (an interpretation of mathematics in terms of modal logic), quasi-empirical realism (that emphasizes the role and use of quasi-empirical methods in mathematics), and an indispensability view (that highlights the indispensable role of quantification over mathematical objects and the support such quantification provides for a realist interpretation of mathematics). I argue that, as he shifted through these views, Putnam aimed to preserve a semantic realist account of mathematics that avoids platonism. In the end, however, each of the proposals faces significant difficulties. A form of skepticism then emergesNesse trabalho, examino as concepções sutis que Putnam desenvolveu em filosofia da matemática, distinguindo três propostas: o modalismo (uma interpretação da matemática em termos de lógica modal), o realismo quase-empírico (que enfatiza o papel e o uso de métodos quase-empíricos na matemática), e uma concepção indispensabilista (que salienta a função indispensável da quantificação sobre objetos matemáticos e o apoio proporcionado por tal quantificação para uma interpretação realista da matemática). Argumento que, ao longo dessas mudanças, Putnam buscou preservar um realismo semântico acerca da matemática que evite o platonismo. Ao final, todavia, cada uma das concepções propostas enfrenta dificuldades significativas. Uma forma de ceticismo então surge.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2013-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p21710.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013); 217-234Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2013); 217-234Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 17 n. 2 (2013); 217-2341808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217/26403Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Buenoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno, Otávio2019-09-13T09:06:32Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32342Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T09:06:32Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
title |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
spellingShingle |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics Bueno, Otávio |
title_short |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
title_full |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
title_fullStr |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
title_sort |
Putnam and the Indispensability of Mathematics |
author |
Bueno, Otávio |
author_facet |
Bueno, Otávio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bueno, Otávio |
description |
In this paper, I examine Putnam’s nuanced views in the philosophy of mathematics, distinguishing three proposals: modalism (an interpretation of mathematics in terms of modal logic), quasi-empirical realism (that emphasizes the role and use of quasi-empirical methods in mathematics), and an indispensability view (that highlights the indispensable role of quantification over mathematical objects and the support such quantification provides for a realist interpretation of mathematics). I argue that, as he shifted through these views, Putnam aimed to preserve a semantic realist account of mathematics that avoids platonism. In the end, however, each of the proposals faces significant difficulties. A form of skepticism then emerges |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217 10.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p217/26403 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Bueno info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Otávio Bueno |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013); 217-234 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2013); 217-234 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 17 n. 2 (2013); 217-234 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435107586605056 |