Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardona, Carlos Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/90691
Resumo: The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.
id UFSC-5_e7950e9759595795de2a66c42dbad496
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90691
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scientific controversies and philosophical traditionControversias científicas y tradición filosóficaDictum cartesianoDictum anarquistaConsensoControversiaTriangulaciónCartesian dictumAnarchist dictumConsensusControversyTriangulationThe article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.En el artículo se encara la siguiente pregunta: ¿por qué la tradicional filosofía de la ciencia ha sido reacia a ocuparse a profundidad de las controversias científicas? Se ofrece una respuesta y se sugiere una alternativa que habría de darle un papel protagónico al estudio de controversias en el marco de la filosofía de la ciencia. Esta propuesta se respalda, en primer lugar, en una breve revisión de la metodología de investigación empleada por Johannes Kepler y, en segundo lugar, en el estudio de la emergencia de la mecánica cuántica adelantado por Mara Beller. La defensa del estudio de controversias se apoya en el reconocimiento del otro como punto fundante de la objetividad científica y en la postulación de una suerte de triangulación.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2023-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/9069110.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 397-424Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 397-424Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 397-4241808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCspahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/90691/55058Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Alberto Cardonahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardona, Carlos Alberto2023-12-27T11:00:27Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90691Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2023-12-27T11:00:27Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
Controversias científicas y tradición filosófica
title Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
spellingShingle Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
Cardona, Carlos Alberto
Dictum cartesiano
Dictum anarquista
Consenso
Controversia
Triangulación
Cartesian dictum
Anarchist dictum
Consensus
Controversy
Triangulation
title_short Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
title_full Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
title_fullStr Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
title_full_unstemmed Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
title_sort Scientific controversies and philosophical tradition
author Cardona, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Cardona, Carlos Alberto
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardona, Carlos Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dictum cartesiano
Dictum anarquista
Consenso
Controversia
Triangulación
Cartesian dictum
Anarchist dictum
Consensus
Controversy
Triangulation
topic Dictum cartesiano
Dictum anarquista
Consenso
Controversia
Triangulación
Cartesian dictum
Anarchist dictum
Consensus
Controversy
Triangulation
description The article discusses the following question: why has the traditional philosophy of science been reluctant to seriously deal with scientific controversies? An answer is offered and an alternative is suggested. This alternative gives a leading role to the study of controversies within the framework of the philosophy of science. This proposal is supported, firstly, by a brief review of the research methodology employed by Johannes Kepler and, secondly, by the study of the emergence of quantum mechanics by Mara Beller. The defense of the study of controversies is based on the recognition of the other one as the founding point of scientific objectivity and in the proposal of a kind of triangulation.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/90691
10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/90691
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e90691
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/90691/55058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Alberto Cardona
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Carlos Alberto Cardona
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023); 397-424
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2023); 397-424
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 3 (2023); 397-424
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875201231486976

Registros relacionados