How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dutra, Luiz Henrique de A.
Data de Publicação: 2005
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14543
Resumo: This paper aims at discussing the usage by Davidson as to events of Quine's criterion of ontological commitment. According to Davidson, we are ontologically committed to the existence of events as individuals as we employ literally terms such as ‘Caesar’s death’, for instance. Davidson extends this analysis to actions as well, since actions are human events. One of the consequences of this view is that psychology dealswith individual events in a non-lawful way. An alternative view is here proposed, based on a complementary criterion, namely ontological density, according to which from the point of view of a given theory, we can always distinguish between events (or phenomena) and individuals (entities) among the overall occurrences described by the theory. Some consequences of this alternative view of psychology as a science dealinglawfully with general human events are also explored here.
id UFSC-5_edfc02038c447fab71715b369c62b48d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14543
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?How Serious is our Ontological Commitment to Events as Individuals?This paper aims at discussing the usage by Davidson as to events of Quine's criterion of ontological commitment. According to Davidson, we are ontologically committed to the existence of events as individuals as we employ literally terms such as ‘Caesar’s death’, for instance. Davidson extends this analysis to actions as well, since actions are human events. One of the consequences of this view is that psychology dealswith individual events in a non-lawful way. An alternative view is here proposed, based on a complementary criterion, namely ontological density, according to which from the point of view of a given theory, we can always distinguish between events (or phenomena) and individuals (entities) among the overall occurrences described by the theory. Some consequences of this alternative view of psychology as a science dealinglawfully with general human events are also explored here.Este artigo procura discutir o uso que Davidson faz com relação a eventos do critério de compromisso ontológico de Quine. De acordo com Davidson, estamos ontologicamente comprometidos com a existência de eventos como indivíduos quando empregamos literalmente expressões como ‘a morte de César’, por exemplo. Davidson estende essa análise também às ações, uma vez que elas são eventos humanos. Uma das conseqüências dessa concepção é que a psicologia lida com eventos individuais de uma forma não-nomológica. Uma concepção alternativa é proposta aqui, baseada em um critério complementar, a saber, a densidade ontológica, de acordo com o qual, do ponto de vista de dada teoria, podemos sempre distinguir entre eventos (ou fenômenos) e indivíduos (ou entidades) destre as ocorrências que em geral são descritas pela teoria. Algumas conseqüências dessa concepção alternativa da psicologia como uma ciência que lida de forma nomológica com eventos humanos gerais também são discutidas aqui.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2005-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1454310.5007/%xPrincipia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 9 No. 1-2 (2005); 43-71Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 9 Núm. 1-2 (2005); 43-71Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 9 n. 1-2 (2005); 43-711808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14543/13315Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de A. Dutrahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Luiz Henrique de A.2016-01-02T12:15:36Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14543Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2016-01-02T12:15:36Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
How Serious is our Ontological Commitment to Events as Individuals?
title How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
spellingShingle How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
Dutra, Luiz Henrique de A.
title_short How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
title_full How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
title_fullStr How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
title_full_unstemmed How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
title_sort How serious is our ontological commitment to events as individuals?
author Dutra, Luiz Henrique de A.
author_facet Dutra, Luiz Henrique de A.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dutra, Luiz Henrique de A.
description This paper aims at discussing the usage by Davidson as to events of Quine's criterion of ontological commitment. According to Davidson, we are ontologically committed to the existence of events as individuals as we employ literally terms such as ‘Caesar’s death’, for instance. Davidson extends this analysis to actions as well, since actions are human events. One of the consequences of this view is that psychology dealswith individual events in a non-lawful way. An alternative view is here proposed, based on a complementary criterion, namely ontological density, according to which from the point of view of a given theory, we can always distinguish between events (or phenomena) and individuals (entities) among the overall occurrences described by the theory. Some consequences of this alternative view of psychology as a science dealinglawfully with general human events are also explored here.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14543
10.5007/%x
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14543
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/%x
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14543/13315
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de A. Dutra
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Luiz Henrique de A. Dutra
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 9 No. 1-2 (2005); 43-71
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 9 Núm. 1-2 (2005); 43-71
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 9 n. 1-2 (2005); 43-71
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435108920393728