Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Gestão & Produção |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2009000300002 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the methodologies of Henry Ford, Taiichi Ohno, and Eliyahu Goldratt and presents explicitly the four principles of flow management according to these operations management philosophies. The differences among them are related to different instances of the same principles in different environments: Ford in his industry focusing on mass production of few (or one) products, Ohno at Toyota with the Toyota production System (TPS), and Goldratt in a wide range of production environments. The concepts are illustrated and tested in a practical case of implementation in the Hitachi Tool Engineering company. Here, we have the classic case of an unlikely successful attempt to implement a methodology (Lean), and how the Theory of Constraints (TOC) solved this issue. Finally, the limits for the solution proposed by Goldratt for operations management (DBR) are described. |
id |
UFSCAR-3_72061fca07ca503222282c747d4c0b95 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-530X2009000300002 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSCAR-3 |
network_name_str |
Gestão & Produção |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering exampleOperations researchTheory of Constraints - TOCLeanToyota Production SystemTPSGoldrattFordOhnoProduction flowFlow principlesThis article analyzes the methodologies of Henry Ford, Taiichi Ohno, and Eliyahu Goldratt and presents explicitly the four principles of flow management according to these operations management philosophies. The differences among them are related to different instances of the same principles in different environments: Ford in his industry focusing on mass production of few (or one) products, Ohno at Toyota with the Toyota production System (TPS), and Goldratt in a wide range of production environments. The concepts are illustrated and tested in a practical case of implementation in the Hitachi Tool Engineering company. Here, we have the classic case of an unlikely successful attempt to implement a methodology (Lean), and how the Theory of Constraints (TOC) solved this issue. Finally, the limits for the solution proposed by Goldratt for operations management (DBR) are described.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2009000300002Gestão & Produção v.16 n.3 2009reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/S0104-530X2009000300002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGoldratt,Eliyahu M.eng2009-12-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2009000300002Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2009-12-07T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
title |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
spellingShingle |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example Goldratt,Eliyahu M. Operations research Theory of Constraints - TOC Lean Toyota Production System TPS Goldratt Ford Ohno Production flow Flow principles |
title_short |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
title_full |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
title_fullStr |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
title_full_unstemmed |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
title_sort |
Standing on the shoulders of giants: production concepts versus production applications. The Hitachi Tool Engineering example |
author |
Goldratt,Eliyahu M. |
author_facet |
Goldratt,Eliyahu M. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Goldratt,Eliyahu M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Operations research Theory of Constraints - TOC Lean Toyota Production System TPS Goldratt Ford Ohno Production flow Flow principles |
topic |
Operations research Theory of Constraints - TOC Lean Toyota Production System TPS Goldratt Ford Ohno Production flow Flow principles |
description |
This article analyzes the methodologies of Henry Ford, Taiichi Ohno, and Eliyahu Goldratt and presents explicitly the four principles of flow management according to these operations management philosophies. The differences among them are related to different instances of the same principles in different environments: Ford in his industry focusing on mass production of few (or one) products, Ohno at Toyota with the Toyota production System (TPS), and Goldratt in a wide range of production environments. The concepts are illustrated and tested in a practical case of implementation in the Hitachi Tool Engineering company. Here, we have the classic case of an unlikely successful attempt to implement a methodology (Lean), and how the Theory of Constraints (TOC) solved this issue. Finally, the limits for the solution proposed by Goldratt for operations management (DBR) are described. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2009000300002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2009000300002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0104-530X2009000300002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção v.16 n.3 2009 reponame:Gestão & Produção instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Gestão & Produção |
collection |
Gestão & Produção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1750118203027095552 |