Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Gestão & Produção |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2022000100204 |
Resumo: | Abstract: Patient experience (PE) has been associated with patients' perception of care services, organizational culture, and interactions experienced by patients. This article aims to characterize the process of measuring adult PE in general hospitals. Therefore, a scoping review (Scoping Review) in a sample of 51 empirical articles dealing with the assessment of PE was analyzed. The results show the predominance of quantitative PE measurement methods. HCAHPS is the most used instrument to evaluate PE. It was also possible to identify the attributes and dimensions (independent variables) considered in the PE measurement. In this case, the relational aspects between patients and health professionals have received great attention in the PE. Measures such as patient experience, satisfaction, quality, and loyalty have been used as PE outcomes (dependent variables). The article contributes to understanding the operationalization and measurement of PE by emphasizing the attributes and dimensions that have been considered in PE measurement, which can be useful for researchers and healthcare professionals interested in evaluating and identifying discrepancies in healthcare services. |
id |
UFSCAR-3_c2d4aa71bd31232636ac991f785a8f93 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-530X2022000100204 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSCAR-3 |
network_name_str |
Gestão & Produção |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping reviewPatient experienceMeasurementHospitalScoping reviewAbstract: Patient experience (PE) has been associated with patients' perception of care services, organizational culture, and interactions experienced by patients. This article aims to characterize the process of measuring adult PE in general hospitals. Therefore, a scoping review (Scoping Review) in a sample of 51 empirical articles dealing with the assessment of PE was analyzed. The results show the predominance of quantitative PE measurement methods. HCAHPS is the most used instrument to evaluate PE. It was also possible to identify the attributes and dimensions (independent variables) considered in the PE measurement. In this case, the relational aspects between patients and health professionals have received great attention in the PE. Measures such as patient experience, satisfaction, quality, and loyalty have been used as PE outcomes (dependent variables). The article contributes to understanding the operationalization and measurement of PE by emphasizing the attributes and dimensions that have been considered in PE measurement, which can be useful for researchers and healthcare professionals interested in evaluating and identifying discrepancies in healthcare services.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2022000100204Gestão & Produção v.29 2022reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e0821info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardo,Juliana Maria SavioMendes,Glauco Henrique de SousaLizarelli,Fabiane LetíciaRoscani,Meliza Goieng2022-03-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2022000100204Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2022-03-03T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
title |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review Bernardo,Juliana Maria Savio Patient experience Measurement Hospital Scoping review |
title_short |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
title_full |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
title_sort |
Instruments to measure patient experience in hospitals: a scoping review |
author |
Bernardo,Juliana Maria Savio |
author_facet |
Bernardo,Juliana Maria Savio Mendes,Glauco Henrique de Sousa Lizarelli,Fabiane Letícia Roscani,Meliza Goi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mendes,Glauco Henrique de Sousa Lizarelli,Fabiane Letícia Roscani,Meliza Goi |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernardo,Juliana Maria Savio Mendes,Glauco Henrique de Sousa Lizarelli,Fabiane Letícia Roscani,Meliza Goi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patient experience Measurement Hospital Scoping review |
topic |
Patient experience Measurement Hospital Scoping review |
description |
Abstract: Patient experience (PE) has been associated with patients' perception of care services, organizational culture, and interactions experienced by patients. This article aims to characterize the process of measuring adult PE in general hospitals. Therefore, a scoping review (Scoping Review) in a sample of 51 empirical articles dealing with the assessment of PE was analyzed. The results show the predominance of quantitative PE measurement methods. HCAHPS is the most used instrument to evaluate PE. It was also possible to identify the attributes and dimensions (independent variables) considered in the PE measurement. In this case, the relational aspects between patients and health professionals have received great attention in the PE. Measures such as patient experience, satisfaction, quality, and loyalty have been used as PE outcomes (dependent variables). The article contributes to understanding the operationalization and measurement of PE by emphasizing the attributes and dimensions that have been considered in PE measurement, which can be useful for researchers and healthcare professionals interested in evaluating and identifying discrepancies in healthcare services. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2022000100204 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2022000100204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e0821 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção v.29 2022 reponame:Gestão & Produção instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Gestão & Produção |
collection |
Gestão & Produção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1750118208121077760 |