Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Gestão & Produção |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215 |
Resumo: | Abstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses. |
id |
UFSCAR-3_fbe20c254571c4fff2eca49903369551 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-530X2021000200215 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSCAR-3 |
network_name_str |
Gestão & Produção |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric studyBPMBusiness processes modelingBusiness processes methodologyAbstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215Gestão & Produção v.28 n.2 2021reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEntringer,Tulio CremoniniFerreira,Ailton da SilvaNascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveiraeng2021-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2021000200215Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2021-06-11T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
title |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study Entringer,Tulio Cremonini BPM Business processes modeling Business processes methodology |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study |
author |
Entringer,Tulio Cremonini |
author_facet |
Entringer,Tulio Cremonini Ferreira,Ailton da Silva Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Ailton da Silva Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Entringer,Tulio Cremonini Ferreira,Ailton da Silva Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BPM Business processes modeling Business processes methodology |
topic |
BPM Business processes modeling Business processes methodology |
description |
Abstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5211 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção v.28 n.2 2021 reponame:Gestão & Produção instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Gestão & Produção |
collection |
Gestão & Produção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1750118207930236928 |