Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Entringer,Tulio Cremonini
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Ailton da Silva, Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Gestão & Produção
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215
Resumo: Abstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses.
id UFSCAR-3_fbe20c254571c4fff2eca49903369551
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-530X2021000200215
network_acronym_str UFSCAR-3
network_name_str Gestão & Produção
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric studyBPMBusiness processes modelingBusiness processes methodologyAbstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215Gestão & Produção v.28 n.2 2021reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEntringer,Tulio CremoniniFerreira,Ailton da SilvaNascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveiraeng2021-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2021000200215Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2021-06-11T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
title Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
Entringer,Tulio Cremonini
BPM
Business processes modeling
Business processes methodology
title_short Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
title_full Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
title_sort Comparative analysis of the main business process modeling methods: a bibliometric study
author Entringer,Tulio Cremonini
author_facet Entringer,Tulio Cremonini
Ferreira,Ailton da Silva
Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Ailton da Silva
Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Entringer,Tulio Cremonini
Ferreira,Ailton da Silva
Nascimento,Denise Cristina de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BPM
Business processes modeling
Business processes methodology
topic BPM
Business processes modeling
Business processes methodology
description Abstract The offer of business process modeling methodologies is quite extensive, making it difficult for scholars in the BPM area to choose properly. In this context, this paper has the objective to present the main modeling methodologies, with applications, examples and comparisons. A systematic bibliographic survey and the comparative analysis of these notations used in the implementation of BPM projects have been carried out. According to the bibliometric analysis, the modeling notations of the business process most portrayed in the works surveyed are: BPMN, UML, EPC and IDEF. From the construction of a consistent overview that allows the comparative analysis of the methodologies, in order to select the one that suits better its specificities it can be verified that, although they share the same objective, each notation has its specific characteristics. This study has the main purpose of providing a basis for the adequate indication of the application of studies in the field, especially those destined for papers, dissertations and theses.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2021000200215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gestão & Produção v.28 n.2 2021
reponame:Gestão & Produção
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Gestão & Produção
collection Gestão & Produção
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1750118207930236928