VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Jupira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Thome, Antonio, Tonial, Fabiana, De Martini, Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSC
Texto Completo: https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4875
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246642
Resumo: The use of microorganisms in liquid medium for the biocementation process, favors the continuity of bacterial growth. However, if it takes too long to use, it stops growing rapidly, leading to cell death. This study compared two forms of biomass production, capable of storing microorganisms in a latent state, maintaining viability for later use. Here we described the preparation of biomasses, made with organic materials and bacteria Sporosarcina pasteurii (CCT 0538 ATCC 1185). Animal (poultry manure) and vegetable (vetch - Vicia villosa Roth) biomasses were tested. Both biomasses maintained the viability of the microorganisms, and the vegetable was more efficient, presenting greater bacterial growth after revitalization. For testing, reference specimens were molded (without biomass) and also with each one of them, and after 28 days tested for traction and compression. The tensile strength showed an increase of 41.2% (animal biomass) and 44.7% (plant biomass). In the compressive strength, the increase was 37.8% (animal biomass) and 38.8% (vegetable biomass), compared to the reference mortar (without the addition of a microorganism)
id UFSC_4aed1cb6cf9c7863187bc007aa82afa2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246642
network_acronym_str UFSC
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSC
repository_id_str 2373
spelling VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTARCOMPARAÇÃO DE BIOMASSA VEGETAL E ANIMAL EM BIOARGAMASSABiocementationBiomineralizationBio-mortarOrganic matterSporosarcina pasteurThe use of microorganisms in liquid medium for the biocementation process, favors the continuity of bacterial growth. However, if it takes too long to use, it stops growing rapidly, leading to cell death. This study compared two forms of biomass production, capable of storing microorganisms in a latent state, maintaining viability for later use. Here we described the preparation of biomasses, made with organic materials and bacteria Sporosarcina pasteurii (CCT 0538 ATCC 1185). Animal (poultry manure) and vegetable (vetch - Vicia villosa Roth) biomasses were tested. Both biomasses maintained the viability of the microorganisms, and the vegetable was more efficient, presenting greater bacterial growth after revitalization. For testing, reference specimens were molded (without biomass) and also with each one of them, and after 28 days tested for traction and compression. The tensile strength showed an increase of 41.2% (animal biomass) and 44.7% (plant biomass). In the compressive strength, the increase was 37.8% (animal biomass) and 38.8% (vegetable biomass), compared to the reference mortar (without the addition of a microorganism)O uso de microrganismos em meio líquido para o processo de biocimentação, favorece a continuidade do crescimento bacteriano. Entretanto se este demora para ser usado, para de crescer rapidamente, levando a morte celular. Este estudo comparou duas formas de produção de uma biomassa, capaz de armazenar os microrganismos em estado de latência mantendo a viabilidade para posterior utilização. Aqui foi descrito o preparo de biomassas, feitas com materiais orgânicos e bactéria Sporosarcina pasteurii (CCT 0538 ATCC 1185). Foram testadas biomassas de origem animal (esterco de aves) e vegetal (ervilhaca - Vicia villosa Roth). Ambas biomassas mantiveram a viabilidade dos microrganismos, sendo que a vegetal foi mais eficiente apresentando maior crescimento bacteriano após a revitalização. Para teste foram moldados corpos de prova referência (sem biomassa) e também com cada uma delas, e depois de 28 dias ensaiados a tração e compressão. A resistência a tração apresentou um aumento de 41,2 % (biomassa animal) e de 44,7 % (biomassa vegetal). Na resistência a compressão o aumento foi de 37,8 % (biomassa animal) e de 38,8 % (biomassa vegetal), comparados a argamassa de referencia (sem adição de microrganismo).UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina2021-08-232023-05-29T21:31:04Z2023-05-29T21:31:04Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/487510.29183/2447-3073.MIX2021.v7.n4.31-38https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246642Mix Sustentável; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - IX ENSUS); 31-38MIX Sustentável; v. 7 n. 4 (2021): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - IX ENSUS); 31-382447-30732447-0899reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4875/3700Copyright (c) 2021 Jupira Almeidainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, JupiraThome, AntonioTonial, FabianaDe Martini, Roberto2023-05-29T21:31:04Zoai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246642Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://150.162.242.35/oai/requestopendoar:23732023-05-29T21:31:04Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
COMPARAÇÃO DE BIOMASSA VEGETAL E ANIMAL EM BIOARGAMASSA
title VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
spellingShingle VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
Almeida, Jupira
Biocementation
Biomineralization
Bio-mortar
Organic matter
Sporosarcina pasteur
title_short VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
title_full VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
title_fullStr VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
title_full_unstemmed VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
title_sort VEGETABLE AND ANIMAL BIOMASS COMPARSION IN BIOMORTAR
author Almeida, Jupira
author_facet Almeida, Jupira
Thome, Antonio
Tonial, Fabiana
De Martini, Roberto
author_role author
author2 Thome, Antonio
Tonial, Fabiana
De Martini, Roberto
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Jupira
Thome, Antonio
Tonial, Fabiana
De Martini, Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biocementation
Biomineralization
Bio-mortar
Organic matter
Sporosarcina pasteur
topic Biocementation
Biomineralization
Bio-mortar
Organic matter
Sporosarcina pasteur
description The use of microorganisms in liquid medium for the biocementation process, favors the continuity of bacterial growth. However, if it takes too long to use, it stops growing rapidly, leading to cell death. This study compared two forms of biomass production, capable of storing microorganisms in a latent state, maintaining viability for later use. Here we described the preparation of biomasses, made with organic materials and bacteria Sporosarcina pasteurii (CCT 0538 ATCC 1185). Animal (poultry manure) and vegetable (vetch - Vicia villosa Roth) biomasses were tested. Both biomasses maintained the viability of the microorganisms, and the vegetable was more efficient, presenting greater bacterial growth after revitalization. For testing, reference specimens were molded (without biomass) and also with each one of them, and after 28 days tested for traction and compression. The tensile strength showed an increase of 41.2% (animal biomass) and 44.7% (plant biomass). In the compressive strength, the increase was 37.8% (animal biomass) and 38.8% (vegetable biomass), compared to the reference mortar (without the addition of a microorganism)
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-23
2023-05-29T21:31:04Z
2023-05-29T21:31:04Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4875
10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2021.v7.n4.31-38
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246642
url https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4875
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246642
identifier_str_mv 10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2021.v7.n4.31-38
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/4875/3700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jupira Almeida
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jupira Almeida
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Mix Sustentável; Vol. 7 No. 4 (2021): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - IX ENSUS); 31-38
MIX Sustentável; v. 7 n. 4 (2021): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - IX ENSUS); 31-38
2447-3073
2447-0899
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSC
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSC
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSC
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808652029209346048