Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSC |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985 |
Resumo: | One of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment. |
id |
UFSC_aed6c43ab83562ea8876cf0f7d37eba5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246985 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSC |
repository_id_str |
2373 |
spelling |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samplesEstudo comparativo da geração de efluentes dos métodos de via úmida - Walkley Black e via seca – equipamento LECO - em análises de determinação de Carbono Orgânico Total – COT em 5 diferentes tipos de amostras sólidasTotal Organic CarbonSolid samplesLECO EquipmentWalkley Black methodOne of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment.Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab2023-06-19T14:59:01Z2023-06-19T14:59:01Z2023-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf978-65-00-70842-42596-237Xhttps://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985Souza, Débora Machado dePereira, Fernanda CardosoOliveira, Daniele Pedroso deSilva, Natália Brambilla daReis, KeliMarques, Mariana WeberOliveira, Lucas ViníciusBrehm, Feliciane AndradeMoraes, Carlos Alberto Mendesporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-06-19T14:59:22Zoai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246985Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://150.162.242.35/oai/requestopendoar:23732023-06-19T14:59:22Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples Estudo comparativo da geração de efluentes dos métodos de via úmida - Walkley Black e via seca – equipamento LECO - em análises de determinação de Carbono Orgânico Total – COT em 5 diferentes tipos de amostras sólidas |
title |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples Souza, Débora Machado de Total Organic Carbon Solid samples LECO Equipment Walkley Black method |
title_short |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
title_full |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
title_sort |
Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples |
author |
Souza, Débora Machado de |
author_facet |
Souza, Débora Machado de Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de Silva, Natália Brambilla da Reis, Keli Marques, Mariana Weber Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius Brehm, Feliciane Andrade Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de Silva, Natália Brambilla da Reis, Keli Marques, Mariana Weber Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius Brehm, Feliciane Andrade Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Débora Machado de Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de Silva, Natália Brambilla da Reis, Keli Marques, Mariana Weber Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius Brehm, Feliciane Andrade Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Total Organic Carbon Solid samples LECO Equipment Walkley Black method |
topic |
Total Organic Carbon Solid samples LECO Equipment Walkley Black method |
description |
One of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-19T14:59:01Z 2023-06-19T14:59:01Z 2023-06-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
978-65-00-70842-4 2596-237X https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985 |
identifier_str_mv |
978-65-00-70842-4 2596-237X |
url |
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSC instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSC |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSC |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808652363296145408 |