Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Débora Machado de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso, Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de, Silva, Natália Brambilla da, Reis, Keli, Marques, Mariana Weber, Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius, Brehm, Feliciane Andrade, Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSC
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985
Resumo: One of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment.
id UFSC_aed6c43ab83562ea8876cf0f7d37eba5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246985
network_acronym_str UFSC
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSC
repository_id_str 2373
spelling Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samplesEstudo comparativo da geração de efluentes dos métodos de via úmida - Walkley Black e via seca – equipamento LECO - em análises de determinação de Carbono Orgânico Total – COT em 5 diferentes tipos de amostras sólidasTotal Organic CarbonSolid samplesLECO EquipmentWalkley Black methodOne of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment.Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab2023-06-19T14:59:01Z2023-06-19T14:59:01Z2023-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf978-65-00-70842-42596-237Xhttps://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985Souza, Débora Machado dePereira, Fernanda CardosoOliveira, Daniele Pedroso deSilva, Natália Brambilla daReis, KeliMarques, Mariana WeberOliveira, Lucas ViníciusBrehm, Feliciane AndradeMoraes, Carlos Alberto Mendesporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-06-19T14:59:22Zoai:repositorio.ufsc.br:123456789/246985Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://150.162.242.35/oai/requestopendoar:23732023-06-19T14:59:22Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
Estudo comparativo da geração de efluentes dos métodos de via úmida - Walkley Black e via seca – equipamento LECO - em análises de determinação de Carbono Orgânico Total – COT em 5 diferentes tipos de amostras sólidas
title Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
spellingShingle Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
Souza, Débora Machado de
Total Organic Carbon
Solid samples
LECO Equipment
Walkley Black method
title_short Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
title_full Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
title_fullStr Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
title_sort Comparative study of effluent generation of wetway methods - Walkley Black and dry way - LECO equipment - in analysis of total organic carbon determination - TOC in 5 different types of solid samples
author Souza, Débora Machado de
author_facet Souza, Débora Machado de
Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso
Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de
Silva, Natália Brambilla da
Reis, Keli
Marques, Mariana Weber
Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius
Brehm, Feliciane Andrade
Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso
Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de
Silva, Natália Brambilla da
Reis, Keli
Marques, Mariana Weber
Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius
Brehm, Feliciane Andrade
Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Débora Machado de
Pereira, Fernanda Cardoso
Oliveira, Daniele Pedroso de
Silva, Natália Brambilla da
Reis, Keli
Marques, Mariana Weber
Oliveira, Lucas Vinícius
Brehm, Feliciane Andrade
Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Total Organic Carbon
Solid samples
LECO Equipment
Walkley Black method
topic Total Organic Carbon
Solid samples
LECO Equipment
Walkley Black method
description One of the most commonly used methods for determining total organic carbon (TOC) content is dry. In some cases, however, the method is not possible due to specific sample conditions, such as the high tendency to combustion. Samples with such characteristics when inserted in the equipment go into instant combustion, making it impossible to read properly. Thus, the Walkley Black Method, by the wet route, becomes a viable alternative. In this sense, the objective of the research was to study and compare the results and effluent generation of dry way methods, by LECO equipment and wet pathway method, Walkley Black, in 4 types of solid samples. The RESULTS of TOC by wet and dry way methods were similar for 4 of the 5 samples. In the evaluation of the effluents generated, the analysis by the LECO equipment generated a smaller amount of effluents than by the Walkley Black method, besides having a easiest treatment.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-19T14:59:01Z
2023-06-19T14:59:01Z
2023-06-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 978-65-00-70842-4
2596-237X
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985
identifier_str_mv 978-65-00-70842-4
2596-237X
url https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/246985
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Grupo de Pesquisa Virtuhab
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSC
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSC
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSC
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808652363296145408