THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pires, Guilherme Nunes
Publication Date: 2018
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Sociais e Humanas
Download full: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/29444
Summary: The aim of this present paper is to indicate the limits of the scientific demarcation criteria proposed by Popper. The problem of demarcation has been object of concern in different time in history. However, the twentieth century was accompanied by intense debates and elaboration of different criteria that could demarcate scientific knowledge of the others. It is also well-known that Karl Popper was the most significant thinker with the falsifiability criterion. Yet, the purely negative character of the scientific enterprise, under its unicriteria approach comprises a kind of inverted positivism, where their limitations present a demarcation criterion that is not necessary and/or sufficient for scientificity
id UFSM-10_afd79e432093e430953d97d452b5bdbe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29444
network_acronym_str UFSM-10
network_name_str Sociais e Humanas
repository_id_str
spelling THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITYOS LIMITES DA FALSEABILIDADE COMO CRITÉRIO DE DEMARCAÇÃO PARA CIENTIFICIDADEKarl PopperFalseabilityDemarcation criterionKarl PopperFalseabilidadeCritério de demarcaçãoThe aim of this present paper is to indicate the limits of the scientific demarcation criteria proposed by Popper. The problem of demarcation has been object of concern in different time in history. However, the twentieth century was accompanied by intense debates and elaboration of different criteria that could demarcate scientific knowledge of the others. It is also well-known that Karl Popper was the most significant thinker with the falsifiability criterion. Yet, the purely negative character of the scientific enterprise, under its unicriteria approach comprises a kind of inverted positivism, where their limitations present a demarcation criterion that is not necessary and/or sufficient for scientificityO objetivo do presente artigo é indicar os limites do critério de demarcação para cientificidade proposto por Karl Popper. O problema de demarcação tem sido objeto de preocupação em diferentes épocas da história. Entretanto, o século XX foi acompanhado por intensos debates e pela elaboração de distintos critérios que pudesse demarcar conhecimento científico dos demais. Também é notório que o pensador que mais obteve significância foi Karl Popper e seu critério de falseabilidade. Contudo, o caráter puramente negativo do empreendimento científico, sob sua abordagem unicriterial, compreende uma espécie de positivismo invertido, onde suas limitações apresentam ser um critério de demarcação não necessário e/ou suficiente para a cientificidade.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/2944410.5902/2317175829444Revista Sociais e Humanas; v. 31 n. 2 (2018): RSH - Cidades e Movimentos Socioculturais2317-17580103-0620reponame:Sociais e Humanasinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/29444/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociais e Humanasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPires, Guilherme Nunes2018-11-28T18:27:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29444Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/sociaisehumanasPUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/sociaisehumanas/oaicarlos.eduardo@cbpciencia.com.br||revistaccsh@gmail.com2317-17580103-0620opendoar:2018-11-28T18:27:27Sociais e Humanas - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
OS LIMITES DA FALSEABILIDADE COMO CRITÉRIO DE DEMARCAÇÃO PARA CIENTIFICIDADE
title THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
spellingShingle THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
Pires, Guilherme Nunes
Karl Popper
Falseability
Demarcation criterion
Karl Popper
Falseabilidade
Critério de demarcação
title_short THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
title_full THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
title_fullStr THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
title_full_unstemmed THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
title_sort THE LIMITS OF FALSEABILITY AS DEMARCATION CRITERIA TO SCIENTIFICITY
author Pires, Guilherme Nunes
author_facet Pires, Guilherme Nunes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pires, Guilherme Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Karl Popper
Falseability
Demarcation criterion
Karl Popper
Falseabilidade
Critério de demarcação
topic Karl Popper
Falseability
Demarcation criterion
Karl Popper
Falseabilidade
Critério de demarcação
description The aim of this present paper is to indicate the limits of the scientific demarcation criteria proposed by Popper. The problem of demarcation has been object of concern in different time in history. However, the twentieth century was accompanied by intense debates and elaboration of different criteria that could demarcate scientific knowledge of the others. It is also well-known that Karl Popper was the most significant thinker with the falsifiability criterion. Yet, the purely negative character of the scientific enterprise, under its unicriteria approach comprises a kind of inverted positivism, where their limitations present a demarcation criterion that is not necessary and/or sufficient for scientificity
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/29444
10.5902/2317175829444
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/29444
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/2317175829444
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/sociaisehumanas/article/view/29444/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociais e Humanas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociais e Humanas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Sociais e Humanas; v. 31 n. 2 (2018): RSH - Cidades e Movimentos Socioculturais
2317-1758
0103-0620
reponame:Sociais e Humanas
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Sociais e Humanas
collection Sociais e Humanas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociais e Humanas - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv carlos.eduardo@cbpciencia.com.br||revistaccsh@gmail.com
_version_ 1799944178217517056

Similar Items