On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté'
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Literatura e Autoritarismo |
DOI: | 10.5902/1679849X72358 |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72358 |
Resumo: | In 1958, Theodor W. Adorno published the first volume of Notas de literatura, which included the essay "Sobre a ingenuidade épica”, written in 1943 as part of research for work produced with Horkheimer, Dialética do esclarecimento. Not by accident is that the concepts developed in this work may elucidate the notion of epic ingenuity presented in the short essay of 1943. In this article, I will analize the adornian concept of “epic ingenuity” in the light of the relationship between myth and reason developed in Dialética do esclarecimento. The contradiction in the epic discourse between the myth and linguistic register is presented as the reflexive principle which allows associations with the discourse of enlightened reason: both discourses intend, through objectivity, to dominate the unknown, lessen the fascination and fear caused by the obscurity. However, they are different because the epic discourse adheres to the particular, whereas the enlightened reason adheres to the universal. The criticism directed to the enlightened reason by the epic ingenuity results from that difference, since the epic discourse, proposing himself as a fiction and abstaining from the classificatory logic, associates concept and object to produce an image of the real. |
id |
UFSM-13_bb0a36a310f5e409a390c3c378c95dcd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/72358 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-13 |
network_name_str |
Literatura e Autoritarismo |
spelling |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté'Sobre o conceito de 'ingenuidade épica' em AdornoAdornoEpic ingenuityEnlightened reasonAdornoIngenuidade épicaRazão esclarecidaIn 1958, Theodor W. Adorno published the first volume of Notas de literatura, which included the essay "Sobre a ingenuidade épica”, written in 1943 as part of research for work produced with Horkheimer, Dialética do esclarecimento. Not by accident is that the concepts developed in this work may elucidate the notion of epic ingenuity presented in the short essay of 1943. In this article, I will analize the adornian concept of “epic ingenuity” in the light of the relationship between myth and reason developed in Dialética do esclarecimento. The contradiction in the epic discourse between the myth and linguistic register is presented as the reflexive principle which allows associations with the discourse of enlightened reason: both discourses intend, through objectivity, to dominate the unknown, lessen the fascination and fear caused by the obscurity. However, they are different because the epic discourse adheres to the particular, whereas the enlightened reason adheres to the universal. The criticism directed to the enlightened reason by the epic ingenuity results from that difference, since the epic discourse, proposing himself as a fiction and abstaining from the classificatory logic, associates concept and object to produce an image of the real.Em 1958, Theodor W. Adorno publicou o primeiro volume da série Notas de literatura, em que constava o ensaio “Sobre a ingenuidade épica”, escrito em 1943 como parte da pesquisa para a obra produzida com Horkheimer, Dialética do esclarecimento. Não por acaso é que os conceitos desenvolvidos nesta obra podem elucidar a noção de ingenuidade épica apresentada no curto ensaio de 1943. Neste artigo, pretendo analisar o conceito adorniano de “ingenuidade épica” à luz da relação entre mito e razão desenvolvida na Dialética do esclarecimento. A contradição no discurso épico entre o mito e o registro linguístico apresenta-se como o princípio reflexivo que permitirá aproximações com o discurso da razão esclarecida: ambos os discursos pretendem, por meio da objetividade, dominar o desconhecido, amenizar o fascínio e o medo provocados pelo que é obscuro. Porém, distinguem-se pelo fato de que o discurso épico atém-se ao particular, ao passo que a razão esclarecida atém-se ao universal. Dessa diferença, resulta a crítica que a ingenuidade épica direciona à razão esclarecida, pois, se inscrevendo no âmbito da ficção e abstendo-se da lógica classificatória que quer dar conta do universal, o discurso épico aproxima conceito e objeto a fim de produzir uma imagem do real.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2023-10-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/7235810.5902/1679849X72358Literatura e Autoritarismo; n. 12 (2012): Dossiê "Theodor Adorno e o estudo da poesia"1679-849Xreponame:Literatura e Autoritarismoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72358/61986Copyright (c) 2012 Literatura e Autoritarismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Honorato, Suene2023-10-16T02:44:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/72358Revistahttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/LA/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/LA/oaigla@mail.ufsm.br||jlourique@pq.cnpq.br1679-849X1679-849Xopendoar:2023-10-16T02:44:18Literatura e Autoritarismo - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' Sobre o conceito de 'ingenuidade épica' em Adorno |
title |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
spellingShingle |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' Honorato, Suene Adorno Epic ingenuity Enlightened reason Adorno Ingenuidade épica Razão esclarecida Honorato, Suene Adorno Epic ingenuity Enlightened reason Adorno Ingenuidade épica Razão esclarecida |
title_short |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
title_full |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
title_fullStr |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
title_sort |
On Adorno's concept of 'epic naïveté' |
author |
Honorato, Suene |
author_facet |
Honorato, Suene Honorato, Suene |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Honorato, Suene |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adorno Epic ingenuity Enlightened reason Adorno Ingenuidade épica Razão esclarecida |
topic |
Adorno Epic ingenuity Enlightened reason Adorno Ingenuidade épica Razão esclarecida |
description |
In 1958, Theodor W. Adorno published the first volume of Notas de literatura, which included the essay "Sobre a ingenuidade épica”, written in 1943 as part of research for work produced with Horkheimer, Dialética do esclarecimento. Not by accident is that the concepts developed in this work may elucidate the notion of epic ingenuity presented in the short essay of 1943. In this article, I will analize the adornian concept of “epic ingenuity” in the light of the relationship between myth and reason developed in Dialética do esclarecimento. The contradiction in the epic discourse between the myth and linguistic register is presented as the reflexive principle which allows associations with the discourse of enlightened reason: both discourses intend, through objectivity, to dominate the unknown, lessen the fascination and fear caused by the obscurity. However, they are different because the epic discourse adheres to the particular, whereas the enlightened reason adheres to the universal. The criticism directed to the enlightened reason by the epic ingenuity results from that difference, since the epic discourse, proposing himself as a fiction and abstaining from the classificatory logic, associates concept and object to produce an image of the real. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72358 10.5902/1679849X72358 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72358 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1679849X72358 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72358/61986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 Literatura e Autoritarismo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2012 Literatura e Autoritarismo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Literatura e Autoritarismo; n. 12 (2012): Dossiê "Theodor Adorno e o estudo da poesia" 1679-849X reponame:Literatura e Autoritarismo instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Literatura e Autoritarismo |
collection |
Literatura e Autoritarismo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Literatura e Autoritarismo - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gla@mail.ufsm.br||jlourique@pq.cnpq.br |
_version_ |
1822183173535039488 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5902/1679849X72358 |