The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Literatura e Autoritarismo
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72045
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to analyze the narratives on epidemics written by historians, chroniclers and novelists, trying to understand how they describe human behavior in these situations. Classic authors of historiography (Tucídides, Boccaccio, Delumeau, among others) and of world literature (Daniel Defoe, Albert Camus, José Saramago, etc.) emphasize a dichotomous ethical behavior, between good and evil. The hypothesis is that this emphasis on extreme behaviors is a rhetorical element, resulting from the wish that the epidemic narratives are ethically exemplary. This reinforces Hayden White's idea that the boundaries between history and literature are not insurmountable.
id UFSM-13_c940bce81ae45fb560311315a84fe128
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/72045
network_acronym_str UFSM-13
network_name_str Literatura e Autoritarismo
repository_id_str
spelling The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and LiteratureO melhor e o pior de nós em tempo de epidemias: diálogos entre História e LiteraturaEpidemiasComportamento humanoHistória e LiteraturaEpidemicsHuman behaviorHistory and LiteratureThe purpose of this article is to analyze the narratives on epidemics written by historians, chroniclers and novelists, trying to understand how they describe human behavior in these situations. Classic authors of historiography (Tucídides, Boccaccio, Delumeau, among others) and of world literature (Daniel Defoe, Albert Camus, José Saramago, etc.) emphasize a dichotomous ethical behavior, between good and evil. The hypothesis is that this emphasis on extreme behaviors is a rhetorical element, resulting from the wish that the epidemic narratives are ethically exemplary. This reinforces Hayden White's idea that the boundaries between history and literature are not insurmountable.A proposta deste artigo é analisar os relatos sobre epidemias escritos por historiadores, cronistas e romancistas procurando perceber como descrevem o comportamento humano nessas situações. Autores clássicos da historiografia (Tucídides, Boccaccio, Delumeau, dentre outros) e da literatura mundial (Daniel Defoe, Albert Camus, José Saramago, etc.) enfatizam um comportamento ético dicotômico, entre o bem e o mal.  A hipótese é que essa ênfase nos comportamentos extremados é um elemento retórico, decorrente do desejo de que as narrativas sobre epidemias sejam exemplares eticamente. Isso reforça a ideia de Hayden White de que os limites entre a história e a literatura não são intransponíveis.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2024-04-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/7204510.5902/1679849X72045Literatura e Autoritarismo; n. 42 (2023): Literatura e Autoritarismo: Distopias e outras formas narrativas; e720451679-849X1679-849Xreponame:Literatura e Autoritarismoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72045/63588Copyright (c) 2024 Literatura e Autoritarismohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de2024-04-08T21:18:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/72045Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/indexPUBhttp://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/LA/oaigla@mail.ufsm.br||jlourique@pq.cnpq.br1679-849X1679-849Xopendoar:2024-04-08T21:18:02Literatura e Autoritarismo - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
O melhor e o pior de nós em tempo de epidemias: diálogos entre História e Literatura
title The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
spellingShingle The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de
Epidemias
Comportamento humano
História e Literatura
Epidemics
Human behavior
History and Literature
title_short The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
title_full The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
title_fullStr The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
title_full_unstemmed The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
title_sort The best and worst of us in epidemic time: dialogues between History and Literature
author Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de
author_facet Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epidemias
Comportamento humano
História e Literatura
Epidemics
Human behavior
History and Literature
topic Epidemias
Comportamento humano
História e Literatura
Epidemics
Human behavior
History and Literature
description The purpose of this article is to analyze the narratives on epidemics written by historians, chroniclers and novelists, trying to understand how they describe human behavior in these situations. Classic authors of historiography (Tucídides, Boccaccio, Delumeau, among others) and of world literature (Daniel Defoe, Albert Camus, José Saramago, etc.) emphasize a dichotomous ethical behavior, between good and evil. The hypothesis is that this emphasis on extreme behaviors is a rhetorical element, resulting from the wish that the epidemic narratives are ethically exemplary. This reinforces Hayden White's idea that the boundaries between history and literature are not insurmountable.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72045
10.5902/1679849X72045
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72045
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1679849X72045
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/LA/article/view/72045/63588
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Literatura e Autoritarismo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Literatura e Autoritarismo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Literatura e Autoritarismo; n. 42 (2023): Literatura e Autoritarismo: Distopias e outras formas narrativas; e72045
1679-849X
1679-849X
reponame:Literatura e Autoritarismo
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Literatura e Autoritarismo
collection Literatura e Autoritarismo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Literatura e Autoritarismo - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gla@mail.ufsm.br||jlourique@pq.cnpq.br
_version_ 1799944019376078848