Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) |
DOI: | 10.5902/2236117062662 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662 |
Resumo: | Hot-mix asphalt used in pavement layers is produced by asphalt plants. In Brazil, despite the fact that these industrial units produce greenhouse gases, no control or measurement protocol has yet been established. This study aims to quantify emissions in different asphalt plants, in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) and energy consumption. Asphalt plants were selected according to their type (batch or drum mix); production capacity (80 to 340 t/h), and whether mobile or fixed. In each plant, emissions were quantified and the energy consumption spent on drying and heating aggregates in the dryer drum was evaluated. The fuels used in the drier drum such as low pour point (LPP) oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and natural gas (NG) were evaluated and compared. The methodology consisted of surveying the thermal power of the dryer drum specified on the suppliers' catalog to calculate the volume of fuel required per ton of asphalt mixture produced. Based on the criterion of the lower calorific value of each fuel, the volume of fuel used was calculated according to the production of the asphalt plants. Through the GHC protocol tool, the quantification of emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases was obtained, and then transformed into CO2eq emissions. As a result, lower energy consumption was observed in the mobile batch plants and higher consumption in the mobile counterflow drum mix plants. On average, 27.69% less energy per ton of processed aggregate was needed compared to the mobile counterflow plants. The use of natural gas in the dryer drum and for all plant models was the least emissive fuel. The results showed that for the mobile batch type with a capacity of 140 t/h, the emission was 13.62 kg of CO2eq / t. On the other hand, with the mobile counterflow type with a capacity of 200 t/h, 13.64 kg of CO2eq/t was produced. Finally, with the fixed counterflow type with a production capacity of 240 t/h and 300 t/h, emissions of 13.67 kg of CO2eq/t were obtained. Through this study, the mobile batch plant with a capacity of 140 t/h using natural gas showed the least environmental impact. When natural gas was used, this model obtained energy consumption and emissions 54.5% lower than the mobile counterflow model with a capacity of 50 t/h which showed the worst environmental performance. |
id |
UFSM-15_989b32b5cf87d7e8a549e1aec2bf3954 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62662 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-15 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) |
spelling |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plantsEmissões de gases de efeito estufa e consumo de energia em usinas de asfaltoGlobal warmingFuelPaving.Aquecimento globalCombustívelPavimentaçãoHot-mix asphalt used in pavement layers is produced by asphalt plants. In Brazil, despite the fact that these industrial units produce greenhouse gases, no control or measurement protocol has yet been established. This study aims to quantify emissions in different asphalt plants, in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) and energy consumption. Asphalt plants were selected according to their type (batch or drum mix); production capacity (80 to 340 t/h), and whether mobile or fixed. In each plant, emissions were quantified and the energy consumption spent on drying and heating aggregates in the dryer drum was evaluated. The fuels used in the drier drum such as low pour point (LPP) oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and natural gas (NG) were evaluated and compared. The methodology consisted of surveying the thermal power of the dryer drum specified on the suppliers' catalog to calculate the volume of fuel required per ton of asphalt mixture produced. Based on the criterion of the lower calorific value of each fuel, the volume of fuel used was calculated according to the production of the asphalt plants. Through the GHC protocol tool, the quantification of emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases was obtained, and then transformed into CO2eq emissions. As a result, lower energy consumption was observed in the mobile batch plants and higher consumption in the mobile counterflow drum mix plants. On average, 27.69% less energy per ton of processed aggregate was needed compared to the mobile counterflow plants. The use of natural gas in the dryer drum and for all plant models was the least emissive fuel. The results showed that for the mobile batch type with a capacity of 140 t/h, the emission was 13.62 kg of CO2eq / t. On the other hand, with the mobile counterflow type with a capacity of 200 t/h, 13.64 kg of CO2eq/t was produced. Finally, with the fixed counterflow type with a production capacity of 240 t/h and 300 t/h, emissions of 13.67 kg of CO2eq/t were obtained. Through this study, the mobile batch plant with a capacity of 140 t/h using natural gas showed the least environmental impact. When natural gas was used, this model obtained energy consumption and emissions 54.5% lower than the mobile counterflow model with a capacity of 50 t/h which showed the worst environmental performance.As misturas asfálticas a quente usadas em camadas de revestimento são produzidas em usinas de asfalto. Apesar dessas unidades industriais serem emissoras de gases de efeito estufa, no Brasil ainda não foi estabelecido controle ou protocolo de medições. Este estudo tem como objetivo quantificar as emissões em diferentes usinas de asfalto, em termos de dióxido de carbono equivalente (CO2eq) e consumo de energia. As usinas de asfalto foram selecionadas em função do tipo, batelada (gravimétrica ou batch) e volumétrica (drum-mixer); da capacidade de produção (80 a 340 t/h) e se estacionária ou fixa. Em cada usina foram quantificadas as emissões e avaliado o consumo de energia despendido para secagem e aquecimento de agregados no tambor secador. Os seguintes combustíveis utilizados no tambor secador óleo de baixo ponto de fluidez (BPF), gás liquefeito do petróleo (GLP) e gás natural (GN) foram avaliados e comparados. A metodologia consistiu no levantamento da potência térmica do tambor secador a partir do catálogo dos fornecedores para calcular o volume de combustível necessário por tonelada de mistura asfáltica produzida. Tendo como critério o poder calorífico inferior de cada combustível, foi calculado o volume de combustível gasto em função da produção das usinas de asfalto. Através da ferramenta GHC protocol foi realizada a quantificação das emissões dos gases dióxido de carbono (CO2), metano (CH4) e óxido nitroso (N2O) e, então, transformadas em emissões de CO2eq. Como resultado, observou-se o menor consumo de energia nas usinas tipo usina batelada móvel e maior consumo nas usinas volumétricas de contrafluxo móvel. Em média, as usinas tipo batelada móvel necessitaram 27,69% menos energia por tonelada de agregado processado em relação à de contrafluxo móvel. O uso de gás natural no tambor secador e para todos os modelos de usinas, foi o combustível menos emissivo. Os resultados mostraram que para o tipo batelada móvel e capacidade de 140 t/h, a emissão foi de 13,62 kg de CO2eq/t, no caso do tipo contrafluxo móvel e capacidade de 200 t/h, obteve 13,64 kg de CO2eq/t e o tipo contrafluxo fixa e capacidades de produção de 240 t/h e 300 t/h, emissões de 13,67 kg de CO2eq/t. Por meio deste estudo, a usina batelada móvel e capacidade de 140 t/h com uso de gás natural obteve menor impacto ambiental. Esse modelo obteve consumo de energia e emissões, quando utilizado gás natural 54,5% menor que o modelo contrafluxo móvel com capacidade de 50 t/h que apresentou o pior desempenho ambiental.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/6266210.5902/2236117062662Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental; Vol. 24 (2020): Special Edition 10 years: Advances in environmental engineering; e7Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental; v. 24 (2020): Edição Especial 10 Anos REGET: Avanços na Engenharia Ambiental; e72236-11702236-1170reponame:Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662/htmlCopyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambientalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Maicon Basso dosCandido, JeffersonBaulé, Sofia de SouzaOliveira, Yuri Mello Müller deThives, Liseane Padilha2022-08-08T14:12:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62662Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/regetPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/oaimarcelobdarosa@gmail.com||reget.ufsm@gmail.com2236-11702236-1170opendoar:2022-08-08T14:12:10Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants Emissões de gases de efeito estufa e consumo de energia em usinas de asfalto |
title |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
spellingShingle |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants Santos, Maicon Basso dos Global warming Fuel Paving. Aquecimento global Combustível Pavimentação Santos, Maicon Basso dos Global warming Fuel Paving. Aquecimento global Combustível Pavimentação |
title_short |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
title_full |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
title_fullStr |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
title_sort |
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants |
author |
Santos, Maicon Basso dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Maicon Basso dos Santos, Maicon Basso dos Candido, Jefferson Baulé, Sofia de Souza Oliveira, Yuri Mello Müller de Thives, Liseane Padilha Candido, Jefferson Baulé, Sofia de Souza Oliveira, Yuri Mello Müller de Thives, Liseane Padilha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Candido, Jefferson Baulé, Sofia de Souza Oliveira, Yuri Mello Müller de Thives, Liseane Padilha |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Maicon Basso dos Candido, Jefferson Baulé, Sofia de Souza Oliveira, Yuri Mello Müller de Thives, Liseane Padilha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global warming Fuel Paving. Aquecimento global Combustível Pavimentação |
topic |
Global warming Fuel Paving. Aquecimento global Combustível Pavimentação |
description |
Hot-mix asphalt used in pavement layers is produced by asphalt plants. In Brazil, despite the fact that these industrial units produce greenhouse gases, no control or measurement protocol has yet been established. This study aims to quantify emissions in different asphalt plants, in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) and energy consumption. Asphalt plants were selected according to their type (batch or drum mix); production capacity (80 to 340 t/h), and whether mobile or fixed. In each plant, emissions were quantified and the energy consumption spent on drying and heating aggregates in the dryer drum was evaluated. The fuels used in the drier drum such as low pour point (LPP) oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and natural gas (NG) were evaluated and compared. The methodology consisted of surveying the thermal power of the dryer drum specified on the suppliers' catalog to calculate the volume of fuel required per ton of asphalt mixture produced. Based on the criterion of the lower calorific value of each fuel, the volume of fuel used was calculated according to the production of the asphalt plants. Through the GHC protocol tool, the quantification of emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) gases was obtained, and then transformed into CO2eq emissions. As a result, lower energy consumption was observed in the mobile batch plants and higher consumption in the mobile counterflow drum mix plants. On average, 27.69% less energy per ton of processed aggregate was needed compared to the mobile counterflow plants. The use of natural gas in the dryer drum and for all plant models was the least emissive fuel. The results showed that for the mobile batch type with a capacity of 140 t/h, the emission was 13.62 kg of CO2eq / t. On the other hand, with the mobile counterflow type with a capacity of 200 t/h, 13.64 kg of CO2eq/t was produced. Finally, with the fixed counterflow type with a production capacity of 240 t/h and 300 t/h, emissions of 13.67 kg of CO2eq/t were obtained. Through this study, the mobile batch plant with a capacity of 140 t/h using natural gas showed the least environmental impact. When natural gas was used, this model obtained energy consumption and emissions 54.5% lower than the mobile counterflow model with a capacity of 50 t/h which showed the worst environmental performance. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662 10.5902/2236117062662 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/2236117062662 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662/pdf https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reget/article/view/62662/html |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental; Vol. 24 (2020): Special Edition 10 years: Advances in environmental engineering; e7 Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental; v. 24 (2020): Edição Especial 10 Anos REGET: Avanços na Engenharia Ambiental; e7 2236-1170 2236-1170 reponame:Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica em Gestão Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental (REGET) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
marcelobdarosa@gmail.com||reget.ufsm@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822179063474683904 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5902/2236117062662 |