THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho, Ícaro Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Soares Filho, Sidney
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22549
Resumo: The Co-guilt Theory, invoked, at first, by the argentine Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, aims to share the responsibility of the individual who commits a crime in certain circumstances, so that the agent has his guilt lessened, or even removed, on account of social and State failures that led him to practice the crime. This study aims to analyze the position of Brazilian Courts of Justice about the (in) applicability of State’s Co-guilt Theory while a generic mitigating circumstance of the article 66 of the Brazilian Criminal Code. The case study of the 27 (twenty seven) courts about the theme aims to subsidize an analysis both quantitatively and qualitatively of these courts decisions and their respective reasoning in light of what the author of this theory teaches, as well as the role of the Judiciary as an independent and harmonic power next to the Legislative and the Executive.
id UFSM-17_0cecd787bdb55006d908d8158328e217
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22549
network_acronym_str UFSM-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICEA APLICAÇÃO DA TEORIA DA COCULPABILIDADE COMO ATENUANTE GENÉRICA DO ART. 66 DO CÓDIGO PENAL À LUZ DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS DE JUSTIÇA BRASILEIROSMitigating circumstanceCo-guiltGenericJurisprudenceCourts of Justice.AtenuanteCoculpabilidadeGenéricaJurisprudênciaTribunais.The Co-guilt Theory, invoked, at first, by the argentine Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, aims to share the responsibility of the individual who commits a crime in certain circumstances, so that the agent has his guilt lessened, or even removed, on account of social and State failures that led him to practice the crime. This study aims to analyze the position of Brazilian Courts of Justice about the (in) applicability of State’s Co-guilt Theory while a generic mitigating circumstance of the article 66 of the Brazilian Criminal Code. The case study of the 27 (twenty seven) courts about the theme aims to subsidize an analysis both quantitatively and qualitatively of these courts decisions and their respective reasoning in light of what the author of this theory teaches, as well as the role of the Judiciary as an independent and harmonic power next to the Legislative and the Executive.A Teoria da Coculpabilidade, invocada, a princípio, pelo argentino Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, objetiva partilhar a responsabilidade do indivíduo que comete um delito em determinadas circunstâncias, de modo que o agente tenha sua culpabilidade diminuída, ou até mesmo afastada, em razão das falhas sociais e estatais que, comprovadamente, o levaram a incorrer na atitude criminosa. O presente trabalho tem a finalidade de analisar a posição dos tribunais de justiça brasileiros acerca da (in)aplicabilidade da Teoria da Coculpabilidade do Estado enquanto atenuante genérica do art. 66 do Código Penal. O estudo jurisprudencial das 27 (vinte e sete) cortes do País acerca do tema objetiva subsidiar uma análise tanto quantitativa quanto qualitativa das decisões destes tribunais e de seus respectivos fundamentos à luz do que leciona o autor da referida teoria, bem como do papel do Judiciário enquanto poder independente e harmônico ao lado do Legislativo e do Executivo.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/2254910.5902/1981369422549Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 1029-10561981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22549/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho, Ícaro GomesSoares Filho, Sidney2018-12-26T16:07:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22549Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2018-12-26T16:07:52Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
A APLICAÇÃO DA TEORIA DA COCULPABILIDADE COMO ATENUANTE GENÉRICA DO ART. 66 DO CÓDIGO PENAL À LUZ DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA DOS TRIBUNAIS DE JUSTIÇA BRASILEIROS
title THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
spellingShingle THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
Coelho, Ícaro Gomes
Mitigating circumstance
Co-guilt
Generic
Jurisprudence
Courts of Justice.
Atenuante
Coculpabilidade
Genérica
Jurisprudência
Tribunais.
title_short THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
title_full THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
title_fullStr THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
title_full_unstemmed THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
title_sort THE APPLICATION OF THE CO-GUILT THEORY AS A GENERIC MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCE OF ARTICLE 66 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL CODE IN THE LIGHT OF JURISPRUDENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN COURTS OF JUSTICE
author Coelho, Ícaro Gomes
author_facet Coelho, Ícaro Gomes
Soares Filho, Sidney
author_role author
author2 Soares Filho, Sidney
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho, Ícaro Gomes
Soares Filho, Sidney
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mitigating circumstance
Co-guilt
Generic
Jurisprudence
Courts of Justice.
Atenuante
Coculpabilidade
Genérica
Jurisprudência
Tribunais.
topic Mitigating circumstance
Co-guilt
Generic
Jurisprudence
Courts of Justice.
Atenuante
Coculpabilidade
Genérica
Jurisprudência
Tribunais.
description The Co-guilt Theory, invoked, at first, by the argentine Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, aims to share the responsibility of the individual who commits a crime in certain circumstances, so that the agent has his guilt lessened, or even removed, on account of social and State failures that led him to practice the crime. This study aims to analyze the position of Brazilian Courts of Justice about the (in) applicability of State’s Co-guilt Theory while a generic mitigating circumstance of the article 66 of the Brazilian Criminal Code. The case study of the 27 (twenty seven) courts about the theme aims to subsidize an analysis both quantitatively and qualitatively of these courts decisions and their respective reasoning in light of what the author of this theory teaches, as well as the role of the Judiciary as an independent and harmonic power next to the Legislative and the Executive.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22549
10.5902/1981369422549
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22549
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1981369422549
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/22549/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 11 n. 3 (2016); 1029-1056
1981-3694
1981-3694
reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
collection Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com
_version_ 1799944062839554048

Registros relacionados