TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sparemberger, Raquel Fabiana Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rosa, Marina de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/33098
Resumo: This paper purpose examines the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the guarantee of the right to equality and non-discrimination. It is questioned whether if the doctrine of equal protection inaugurated in the Board of Education of Topeka case is enough to ensure equality for the African-American population due to the recent history of racial segregation in that country. In other words, it seeks to examine to what extent equal protection doctrine is an effective response to the separate but equal segregation policy ratified by the Supreme Court. It is evaluated, with the application of the inductive method, and according the concepts of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, equal protection, disparate impact, separate but equal, as well as the positive obligations resulting from the duty of non-discrimination, and, still, in the process of American slavery, that the decision of the Board of Education case is not enough to guarantee material equality. In this sense, is sustained the application of affirmative measures for the effectiveness of equality in relation to historically marginalized groups.
id UFSM-17_1e0266731b99072aae510fb5b6ab8b85
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33098
network_acronym_str UFSM-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATIONTOGETHER AND EQUAL? DE LA NECESIDAD DE FUNDAMENTAR EL DERECHO A LA IGUALDAD MAS ALLÁ DEL FALLO BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATIONTOGETHER AND EQUAL? DA NECESSÁRIA FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DO DIREITO À IGUALDADE PARA ALÉM DO CASO BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATIONBrown v. Board of EducationEqual protectionEqualityNon-discriminationSupreme Court of United States.Brown v. Board of EducationEqual protectionIgualdadNo DiscriminaciónSuprema Corte de los EEUU.Brown v. Board of EducationEqual protectionIgualdadeNão discriminaçãoSuprema Corte dos EUA.This paper purpose examines the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the guarantee of the right to equality and non-discrimination. It is questioned whether if the doctrine of equal protection inaugurated in the Board of Education of Topeka case is enough to ensure equality for the African-American population due to the recent history of racial segregation in that country. In other words, it seeks to examine to what extent equal protection doctrine is an effective response to the separate but equal segregation policy ratified by the Supreme Court. It is evaluated, with the application of the inductive method, and according the concepts of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, equal protection, disparate impact, separate but equal, as well as the positive obligations resulting from the duty of non-discrimination, and, still, in the process of American slavery, that the decision of the Board of Education case is not enough to guarantee material equality. In this sense, is sustained the application of affirmative measures for the effectiveness of equality in relation to historically marginalized groups.Este trabajo tiene por objetivo examinar la evolución de la jurisprudencia de la Suprema Corte de los Estados Unidos cuanto a la garantía del derecho a la igualdad y a no discriminación. Se pregunta si la doctrina de la equal protection, inaugurada en el caso Board of Education of Topeka, es suficiente para asegurar la igualdad a la populación afroamericana debido al histórico reciente de segregación racial en dicho país. Es decir, se intenta examinar si la equal protection es una respuesta eficaz a lo separate but equal, política de segregación ratificada por la Suprema Corte. Se evalúa, con la aplicación del método inductivo, y bajo los conceptos de discriminación directa, discriminación indirecta, equal protection, diparate impact, separate but equal, así como las obligaciones positivas decurrentes del deber de no discriminación, y, aún, en el proceso de esclavitud estadunidense, que la decisión afincada en el caso Board of Education no es suficiente para garantizar la igualdad material. De ese modo, se sostiene la aplicación de medida afirmativas para la eficacia de la igualdad em relación a grupos históricamente marginalizados.Este artigo objetiva avaliar a evolução da jurisprudência da Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos no que se refere à garantia do direito à igualdade e a não discriminação. Questiona-se se a doutrina da equal protection, inaugurada no caso Board of Education of Topeka, é suficiente para assegurar a igualdade à população afro-americana em vista do histórico recente de segregação racial naquele país. Isto é, procura-se examinar em que sentido a equal protection é uma resposta eficaz ao separete but equal, política segregatória ratificada pela própria Suprema Corte. Avalia-se, pela aplicação do método indutivo, com base nos conceitos de discriminação direta, discriminação indireta, equal protection, diparate impact, separate but equal, bem como as obrigações positivas decorrentes do dever de não discriminação, e, ainda, no processo de escravidão estadunidense, que a posição sedimentada no caso Board of Education não é suficiente para a garantia da igualdade material. Assim, postula-se pela aplicação de medidas afirmativas para a eficácia da igualdade em relação a grupos historicamente marginalizados.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/3309810.5902/1981369433098Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); e330981981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/33098/pdfCopyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSparemberger, Raquel Fabiana LopesRosa, Marina de Almeida2022-10-03T19:00:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33098Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2022-10-03T19:00:07Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
TOGETHER AND EQUAL? DE LA NECESIDAD DE FUNDAMENTAR EL DERECHO A LA IGUALDAD MAS ALLÁ DEL FALLO BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
TOGETHER AND EQUAL? DA NECESSÁRIA FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DO DIREITO À IGUALDADE PARA ALÉM DO CASO BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
title TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
spellingShingle TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
Sparemberger, Raquel Fabiana Lopes
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Equality
Non-discrimination
Supreme Court of United States.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdad
No Discriminación
Suprema Corte de los EEUU.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdade
Não discriminação
Suprema Corte dos EUA.
title_short TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
title_full TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
title_fullStr TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
title_full_unstemmed TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
title_sort TOGETHER AND EQUAL? OF THE NECESSARY FOUNDAMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEYOND THE CASE BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION
author Sparemberger, Raquel Fabiana Lopes
author_facet Sparemberger, Raquel Fabiana Lopes
Rosa, Marina de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Rosa, Marina de Almeida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sparemberger, Raquel Fabiana Lopes
Rosa, Marina de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Equality
Non-discrimination
Supreme Court of United States.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdad
No Discriminación
Suprema Corte de los EEUU.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdade
Não discriminação
Suprema Corte dos EUA.
topic Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Equality
Non-discrimination
Supreme Court of United States.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdad
No Discriminación
Suprema Corte de los EEUU.
Brown v. Board of Education
Equal protection
Igualdade
Não discriminação
Suprema Corte dos EUA.
description This paper purpose examines the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the guarantee of the right to equality and non-discrimination. It is questioned whether if the doctrine of equal protection inaugurated in the Board of Education of Topeka case is enough to ensure equality for the African-American population due to the recent history of racial segregation in that country. In other words, it seeks to examine to what extent equal protection doctrine is an effective response to the separate but equal segregation policy ratified by the Supreme Court. It is evaluated, with the application of the inductive method, and according the concepts of direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, equal protection, disparate impact, separate but equal, as well as the positive obligations resulting from the duty of non-discrimination, and, still, in the process of American slavery, that the decision of the Board of Education case is not enough to guarantee material equality. In this sense, is sustained the application of affirmative measures for the effectiveness of equality in relation to historically marginalized groups.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/33098
10.5902/1981369433098
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/33098
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1981369433098
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/33098/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 15 n. 3 (2020); e33098
1981-3694
1981-3694
reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
collection Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com
_version_ 1789434544493953024

Registros relacionados