ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Crawford, Colin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/27197
Resumo: The article proceeds in three parts. The first, the articles’ analytical heart, considers the political economy of legal knowledge. It describes briefly the free market of legal ideas and the colonial model for the production of legal knowledge. It illustrates how these two models work using examples from our “South-North Partnerships” (SNP), that is, our collaborative practices in the creation of legal thought as they play out in the legal academies of the global North and South. The second part is both descriptive and reflective, focusing on four different SNP examples that illustrate challenges in the creation of truly collaborative legal knowledge production processes. It identifies common challenges in these endeavors, from surmounting basic organizational issues such as language barriers to jostling with fundamentals like conflicting academic calendars. Most importantly, the second part indicates how the dynamics of the political economy of legal knowledge played out in the SNPs described. It also highlights possible ways to equalize these relationships and activities, with an end to creating SNPs focused on truly collaborative legal knowledge production. The third part offers conclusions and recommendations. 
id UFSM-17_c5b7b251d9b323d93770e04022b7e534
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27197
network_acronym_str UFSM-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGECOLABORACIONES ACADÉMICAS EN LAS AMÉRICAS: ALGUNAS REFLEXIONES ACERCA DE LA ECONOMÍA POLÍTICA DEL CONOCIMIENTO JURÍDICOACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGELaw TheoryLegal knowledgeInternational collaborationsPolitical Economy of Law.Teoría de derechoConocimiento jurídicoColaboraciones internacionalesEconomía Política del Derecho.Legal knowledgePolitical economy of lawInternational collaborationsTheory of law.The article proceeds in three parts. The first, the articles’ analytical heart, considers the political economy of legal knowledge. It describes briefly the free market of legal ideas and the colonial model for the production of legal knowledge. It illustrates how these two models work using examples from our “South-North Partnerships” (SNP), that is, our collaborative practices in the creation of legal thought as they play out in the legal academies of the global North and South. The second part is both descriptive and reflective, focusing on four different SNP examples that illustrate challenges in the creation of truly collaborative legal knowledge production processes. It identifies common challenges in these endeavors, from surmounting basic organizational issues such as language barriers to jostling with fundamentals like conflicting academic calendars. Most importantly, the second part indicates how the dynamics of the political economy of legal knowledge played out in the SNPs described. It also highlights possible ways to equalize these relationships and activities, with an end to creating SNPs focused on truly collaborative legal knowledge production. The third part offers conclusions and recommendations. El artículo prosigue en tres partes. La primera, el corazón analítico del artículo, considera la economía política del conocimiento jurídico. Describa brevemente el libre mercado de ideas legales y el modelo colonial para la producción del conocimiento jurídico. , Que ilustra cómo estos dos modelos funcionan usando ejemplos de nuestras "Alianzas Sur-Norte" (SNP), es decir, nuestras prácticas colaborativas en la creación del pensamiento jurídico como se desarrollan en las academias jurídicas del Norte y Sur global. La segunda parte es descriptiva y reflexiva al mismo tiempo, enfocando en cuatro ejemplos diferentes de SNP que ilustran algunos desafíos en la creación de procesos de producción de conocimiento legal verdaderamente colaborativos. Identifica desafíos comunes en estos esfuerzos, de superar cuestiones organizacionales básicas, tales como barreras lingüísticas, hasta cuestionar fundamentos como calendarios académicos incompatibles. Más importante aún, la segunda parte indica cómo la dinámica de la economía política del conocimiento jurídico evolucionó en las SNP descritas. También destaca formas posibles de equalizar esas relaciones y actividades, con el fin de la creación de SNPs enfocadas en la real producción colaborativa de conocimiento legal. La tercera parte presenta conclusiones y recomendaciones. The article proceeds in three parts. The first, the articles’ analytical heart, considers the political economy of legal knowledge. It describes briefly the free market of legal ideas and the colonial model for the production of legal knowledge. It illustrates how these two models work using examples from our “South-North Partnerships” (SNP), that is, our collaborative practices in the creation of legal thought as they play out in the legal academies of the global North and South. The second part is both descriptive and reflective, focusing on four different SNP examples that illustrate challenges in the creation of truly collaborative legal knowledge production processes. It identifies common challenges in these endeavors, from surmounting basic organizational issues such as language barriers to jostling with fundamentals like conflicting academic calendars. Most importantly, the second part indicates how the dynamics of the political economy of legal knowledge played out in the SNPs described. It also highlights possible ways to equalize these relationships and activities, with an end to creating SNPs focused on truly collaborative legal knowledge production. The third part offers conclusions and recommendations. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2017-08-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/2719710.5902/1981369427197Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 12 n. 2 (2017); 648-6741981-36941981-3694reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/27197/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBonilla Maldonado, DanielCrawford, Colin2018-12-26T16:06:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27197Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/PUBhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/index.php/revistadireito/oairevistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com1981-36941981-3694opendoar:2018-12-26T16:06:45Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
COLABORACIONES ACADÉMICAS EN LAS AMÉRICAS: ALGUNAS REFLEXIONES ACERCA DE LA ECONOMÍA POLÍTICA DEL CONOCIMIENTO JURÍDICO
ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
title ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
spellingShingle ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel
Law Theory
Legal knowledge
International collaborations
Political Economy of Law.
Teoría de derecho
Conocimiento jurídico
Colaboraciones internacionales
Economía Política del Derecho.
Legal knowledge
Political economy of law
International collaborations
Theory of law.
title_short ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
title_full ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
title_fullStr ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
title_full_unstemmed ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
title_sort ACADEMIC COLLABORATIONS IN THE AMERICAS: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE
author Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel
author_facet Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel
Crawford, Colin
author_role author
author2 Crawford, Colin
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bonilla Maldonado, Daniel
Crawford, Colin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law Theory
Legal knowledge
International collaborations
Political Economy of Law.
Teoría de derecho
Conocimiento jurídico
Colaboraciones internacionales
Economía Política del Derecho.
Legal knowledge
Political economy of law
International collaborations
Theory of law.
topic Law Theory
Legal knowledge
International collaborations
Political Economy of Law.
Teoría de derecho
Conocimiento jurídico
Colaboraciones internacionales
Economía Política del Derecho.
Legal knowledge
Political economy of law
International collaborations
Theory of law.
description The article proceeds in three parts. The first, the articles’ analytical heart, considers the political economy of legal knowledge. It describes briefly the free market of legal ideas and the colonial model for the production of legal knowledge. It illustrates how these two models work using examples from our “South-North Partnerships” (SNP), that is, our collaborative practices in the creation of legal thought as they play out in the legal academies of the global North and South. The second part is both descriptive and reflective, focusing on four different SNP examples that illustrate challenges in the creation of truly collaborative legal knowledge production processes. It identifies common challenges in these endeavors, from surmounting basic organizational issues such as language barriers to jostling with fundamentals like conflicting academic calendars. Most importantly, the second part indicates how the dynamics of the political economy of legal knowledge played out in the SNPs described. It also highlights possible ways to equalize these relationships and activities, with an end to creating SNPs focused on truly collaborative legal knowledge production. The third part offers conclusions and recommendations. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/27197
10.5902/1981369427197
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/27197
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1981369427197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistadireito/article/view/27197/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM; v. 12 n. 2 (2017); 648-674
1981-3694
1981-3694
reponame:Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
collection Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadireito@ufsm.br||advrso@gmail.com
_version_ 1799944063301976064

Registros relacionados