Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/18497 |
Resumo: | The right to intimacy, foreseen in article 5 of the Federal Constitution, acquires new delineations in the context of the network society, characterized by the use of information and communication technologies, especially the Internet. From the investigation of its historicity, this right is exposed considering the temporality and complexity of the 21st Century, which brings with it new and sophisticated mechanisms for the invasion and violation of the individual's privacy, which becomes vulnerable in this scenario. Therefore, the legal and decision-making grounds for the pre-comprehension of the right to intimacy are discussed based on the theoretical contributions of Gadamer and Dworkin, also reflecting on the role of the judge in the hermeneutical constitutional jurisdiction and about the possibility of obtaining right answers in cases of right to privacy’ violations. For that, the approach will be phenomenological-hermeneutical, allied to the methods of historical, comparative and case study procedures. The intention is to ascertain which legal elements should be previously understood in the construction of judicial decisions involving the fundamental right to intimacy in the context of the network society, starting from the need for procedural jurisdiction to provide right answers to the Constitution in the Democratic State. At the end, a critical reflection is provided on decisions taken by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to verify the state of the art of decisions which involve intimacy and the Internet, and especially its adequacy of the answers to the Constitution, basis and observation of the coherence and integrity of the law. |
id |
UFSM-20_07b3d9f26ef7eea41dd2cf1b01435715 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/18497 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2019-10-07T20:29:15Z2019-10-07T20:29:15Z2017-02-22http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/18497The right to intimacy, foreseen in article 5 of the Federal Constitution, acquires new delineations in the context of the network society, characterized by the use of information and communication technologies, especially the Internet. From the investigation of its historicity, this right is exposed considering the temporality and complexity of the 21st Century, which brings with it new and sophisticated mechanisms for the invasion and violation of the individual's privacy, which becomes vulnerable in this scenario. Therefore, the legal and decision-making grounds for the pre-comprehension of the right to intimacy are discussed based on the theoretical contributions of Gadamer and Dworkin, also reflecting on the role of the judge in the hermeneutical constitutional jurisdiction and about the possibility of obtaining right answers in cases of right to privacy’ violations. For that, the approach will be phenomenological-hermeneutical, allied to the methods of historical, comparative and case study procedures. The intention is to ascertain which legal elements should be previously understood in the construction of judicial decisions involving the fundamental right to intimacy in the context of the network society, starting from the need for procedural jurisdiction to provide right answers to the Constitution in the Democratic State. At the end, a critical reflection is provided on decisions taken by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to verify the state of the art of decisions which involve intimacy and the Internet, and especially its adequacy of the answers to the Constitution, basis and observation of the coherence and integrity of the law.O direito à intimidade, previsto no artigo 5º da Constituição Federal, adquire novas nuances no contexto da sociedade em rede, caracterizada pela utilização das tecnologias de informação e de comunicação, especialmente a Internet. A partir da investigação de sua historicidade, tal direito é exposto considerando a temporalidade e a complexidade do Século XXI, que traz consigo novos e sofisticados mecanismos para a invasão e violação da intimidade do indivíduo, o qual se torna vulnerável neste cenário. Diante disso, são debatidos os fundamentos legais e decisórios para a pré-compreensão do direito à intimidade, a partir dos aportes teóricos de Gadamer e Dworkin, refletindo-se, ainda, sobre o papel do juiz na jurisdição constitucional hermenêutica e sobre a possibilidade de se falar na obtenção de respostas adequadas em casos de violação ao direito à intimidade. Para tanto, a abordagem será fenomenológico-hermenêutica, aliada aos métodos de procedimento histórico, comparativo e de estudo de casos. Pretende-se, assim, verificar quais elementos jurídicos devem ser previamente compreendidos na construção de decisões judiciais envolvendo a questão do direito fundamental à intimidade, no contexto da sociedade em rede, partindo-se da necessidade de a jurisdição processual proferir respostas adequadas à Constituição no Estado Democrático de Direito. Ao final, realiza-se uma reflexão crítica acerca de decisões oriundas do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal, a fim de verificar o estado da arte dos julgados que envolvem intimidade e Internet, e, sobretudo a adequação das respostas à Constituição, a fundamentação e a observância da coerência e da integridade do Direito.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFSMBrasilDireitoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIntimidadeSociedade em redeInternetRespostas adequadas à ConstituiçãoDecisões judiciaisIntimacyNetwork societyRight answers to the ConstitutionJudicial decisionsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOLevando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em redeLeading the serious intimacy in the context of the society in networkinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisIsaia, Cristiano Beckerhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1677439477708820Saldanha, Jânia Maria Lopeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9285450415334580Richter, Danielahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8286207405188331http://lattes.cnpq.br/6779136854352448Hoch, Patrícia Adriani6001000000016005a4a7930-9117-4f41-aa5c-132d8b63cfcaa02561d5-a8e7-4653-a833-ec5b41a50ad1e1d83a36-5f88-4d9b-a58e-2c2c2b454b19c41fc03f-8983-4701-b06c-d4880e173df3reponame:Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdfDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf2203033http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/1/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdfc6dda66dc4cf9db3174c088d66251e03MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.txtDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain444377http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/4/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.txt744f2c4ed7b32c7ea224b1f0a72c3b1bMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4748http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/5/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.jpg246c38b61445dce7ae655ab4d72f2ddcMD551/184972019-10-08 03:00:54.092oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestouvidoria@ufsm.bropendoar:39132019-10-08T06:00:54Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Leading the serious intimacy in the context of the society in network |
title |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
spellingShingle |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede Hoch, Patrícia Adriani Intimidade Sociedade em rede Internet Respostas adequadas à Constituição Decisões judiciais Intimacy Network society Right answers to the Constitution Judicial decisions CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
title_full |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
title_fullStr |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
title_full_unstemmed |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
title_sort |
Levando o direito à intimidade à sério no contexto da sociedade em rede |
author |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani |
author_facet |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Isaia, Cristiano Becker |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1677439477708820 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Saldanha, Jânia Maria Lopes |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9285450415334580 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Richter, Daniela |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8286207405188331 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6779136854352448 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hoch, Patrícia Adriani |
contributor_str_mv |
Isaia, Cristiano Becker Saldanha, Jânia Maria Lopes Richter, Daniela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intimidade Sociedade em rede Internet Respostas adequadas à Constituição Decisões judiciais |
topic |
Intimidade Sociedade em rede Internet Respostas adequadas à Constituição Decisões judiciais Intimacy Network society Right answers to the Constitution Judicial decisions CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Intimacy Network society Right answers to the Constitution Judicial decisions |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The right to intimacy, foreseen in article 5 of the Federal Constitution, acquires new delineations in the context of the network society, characterized by the use of information and communication technologies, especially the Internet. From the investigation of its historicity, this right is exposed considering the temporality and complexity of the 21st Century, which brings with it new and sophisticated mechanisms for the invasion and violation of the individual's privacy, which becomes vulnerable in this scenario. Therefore, the legal and decision-making grounds for the pre-comprehension of the right to intimacy are discussed based on the theoretical contributions of Gadamer and Dworkin, also reflecting on the role of the judge in the hermeneutical constitutional jurisdiction and about the possibility of obtaining right answers in cases of right to privacy’ violations. For that, the approach will be phenomenological-hermeneutical, allied to the methods of historical, comparative and case study procedures. The intention is to ascertain which legal elements should be previously understood in the construction of judicial decisions involving the fundamental right to intimacy in the context of the network society, starting from the need for procedural jurisdiction to provide right answers to the Constitution in the Democratic State. At the end, a critical reflection is provided on decisions taken by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice and the Federal Supreme Court, in order to verify the state of the art of decisions which involve intimacy and the Internet, and especially its adequacy of the answers to the Constitution, basis and observation of the coherence and integrity of the law. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-02-22 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-07T20:29:15Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-07T20:29:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/18497 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/18497 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
600100000001 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
5a4a7930-9117-4f41-aa5c-132d8b63cfca a02561d5-a8e7-4653-a833-ec5b41a50ad1 e1d83a36-5f88-4d9b-a58e-2c2c2b454b19 c41fc03f-8983-4701-b06c-d4880e173df3 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
collection |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/1/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/4/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/18497/5/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2017_HOCH_PATRICIA.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c6dda66dc4cf9db3174c088d66251e03 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 744f2c4ed7b32c7ea224b1f0a72c3b1b 246c38b61445dce7ae655ab4d72f2ddc |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional Manancial UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ouvidoria@ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1808854693495963648 |