Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21686 |
Resumo: | Pain should not be overlooked in animals and the effectiveness of its treatment depends on reliable identification and assessment. Although there are studies correlating pain scores with the gender of the evaluator based on the completion of questionnaires, there are no prospective studies of canine and feline pain assessment that confirm these differences. The present study aimed to determine if the gender and the experience of the evaluators interfere with the postoperative pain perception in canines and felines when different pain assessment scales are used. The data were obtained through the analysis of pain assessment forms performed at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Santa Maria. Sixteen blinded treatment evaluators were randomly assigned to four groups: GMI (inexperienced male group), GME (experienced male group), GFI (inexperienced female group) and GFE (experienced female group). Eighty animals (40 cats and 40 female dogs) were randomly assigned to 2 groups, surgical group (CG) and non-surgical group (CNG). Only the CG group underwent surgical procedure. Pain assessments were performed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Colorado State University Acute Pain Scale (CAPS), Melbourne University Pain Scale (UMPS) and Glasgow Composite Scale (GCMPS) for canines and, EVA, Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale (CAPS-F), Glasgow Composite Climbing (GCMPS-F) and UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Scale (EUNESP) for felines. Baseline evaluation (Mbasal) occurred one hour before the surgical procedure, followed by evaluations after 15 minutes (M1), two hours (M2) and four hours (M3) after discharge from the operating room. A total of 1280 evaluations were performed, being 640 evaluations by species and 320 by evaluator group. Males scored significantly higher than females with CAPS on canines. In felines, gender and treatment interaction was significant for the VAS scale, and experience and treatment interaction was significant for the EVA, EUNESP and GCMPS-F pain assessment scales. It was concluded that the gender and the experience of the evaluators should be considered when choosing the pain evaluation method to be used in these species. |
id |
UFSM-20_0f7be38edd2ab7b51ff797ffa4611ef1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21686 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2021-08-02T17:50:44Z2021-08-02T17:50:44Z2019-12-06http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21686Pain should not be overlooked in animals and the effectiveness of its treatment depends on reliable identification and assessment. Although there are studies correlating pain scores with the gender of the evaluator based on the completion of questionnaires, there are no prospective studies of canine and feline pain assessment that confirm these differences. The present study aimed to determine if the gender and the experience of the evaluators interfere with the postoperative pain perception in canines and felines when different pain assessment scales are used. The data were obtained through the analysis of pain assessment forms performed at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Santa Maria. Sixteen blinded treatment evaluators were randomly assigned to four groups: GMI (inexperienced male group), GME (experienced male group), GFI (inexperienced female group) and GFE (experienced female group). Eighty animals (40 cats and 40 female dogs) were randomly assigned to 2 groups, surgical group (CG) and non-surgical group (CNG). Only the CG group underwent surgical procedure. Pain assessments were performed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Colorado State University Acute Pain Scale (CAPS), Melbourne University Pain Scale (UMPS) and Glasgow Composite Scale (GCMPS) for canines and, EVA, Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale (CAPS-F), Glasgow Composite Climbing (GCMPS-F) and UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Scale (EUNESP) for felines. Baseline evaluation (Mbasal) occurred one hour before the surgical procedure, followed by evaluations after 15 minutes (M1), two hours (M2) and four hours (M3) after discharge from the operating room. A total of 1280 evaluations were performed, being 640 evaluations by species and 320 by evaluator group. Males scored significantly higher than females with CAPS on canines. In felines, gender and treatment interaction was significant for the VAS scale, and experience and treatment interaction was significant for the EVA, EUNESP and GCMPS-F pain assessment scales. It was concluded that the gender and the experience of the evaluators should be considered when choosing the pain evaluation method to be used in these species.A dor não deve ser negligenciada em animais e a eficácia do seu tratamento depende da identificação e avaliação confiável. Apesar de existirem estudos correlacionando escores de dor com o gênero do avaliador baseados no preenchimento de questionários, não há estudos prospectivos de avaliação de dor em caninos e felinos que confirmem estas diferenças. O presente estudo objetivou determinar se o gênero e a experiência dos avaliadores interferem na percepção de dor pós-operatória em caninas e felinas quando utilizadas diferentes escalas de avaliação de dor. Os dados foram obtidos através da análise de fichas de avaliações de dor realizadas no Hospital Veterinário da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Para isso, foram selecionados 16 avaliadores cegos ao tratamento, alocados aleatoriamente em 4 grupos, sendo estes GMI (grupo masculino inexperiente), GME (grupo masculino experiente), GFI (grupo feminino inexperiente) e GFE (grupo feminino experiente). Foram avaliados 80 animais (40 gatas e 40 cadelas) distribuídos aleatoriamente em 2 grupos, grupo cirúrgico (GC) e grupo não cirúrgico (GNC). Apenas o grupo GC foi submetido a procedimento cirúrgico. As avaliações de dor foram realizadas através da utilização da Escala Visual Analógica (EVA), Escala de Dor Aguda da Universidade do Estado do Colorado (CAPS), Escala de Dor da Universidade de Melbourne (UMPS) e escala Composta de Glasgow (GCMPS) para as caninas e, EVA, Escala Felina de Dor Aguda da Universidade Estadual do Colorado (CAPS-F), Escalada Composta de Glasgow (GCMPS-F) e Escala Multidimensional da UNESP-Botucatu (EUNESP) para as felinas. A avaliação basal (Mbasal) ocorreu uma hora antes do procedimento cirúrgico, seguidas pelas avaliações após 15 minutos (M1), duas horas (M2) e quatro horas (M3) após a alta do centro cirúrgico. Um total de 1280 avaliações foram realizadas, sendo 640 avaliações por espécie e 320 por grupo de avaliador. O gênero masculino atribuiu escores significativamente maiores que o feminino com a escala CAPS nas caninas. Nas felinas, a interação gênero e tratamento foi significativa para a escala EVA, e a interação experiência e tratamento foi significativa para as escalas de avaliação de dor EVA, EUNESP e GCMPS-F. Concluiu-se que o gênero e a experiência dos avaliadores devem ser considerados na escolha do método de avaliação de dor a ser utilizados nessas espécies.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina VeterináriaUFSMBrasilMedicina VeterináriaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvaliação de dorCãesDor agudaEscala de dorGatosPain assessmentDogsAcute painScale of painCatsCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIAGênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatasInfluence of gender and evaluator experience on post-operative pain perception in bitches and catsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisSoares, André Vasconceloshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1413221301096456Müller, Daniel Curvello de MendonçaPinto Filho, Saulo Tadeu LemosOliveira, Marília Teresa dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9479613263400983Tomio, Jéssica500500000007600600600600600600a310c02b-b586-4b56-8055-4ba749aaae238c68a5e6-0c8d-4809-b213-2b0cd83d349250de8566-4794-4e55-acce-01e9baf7b6b0f8b01873-2d75-4c90-b286-7aec4995fe6a50a40b8d-c4e9-434e-bbf6-8ca2aa6999fdreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdfDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdfDissertaçãoapplication/pdf2523204http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/1/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdfa3a880ef4df47092d881a6c00e28bafdMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.txtDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain90242http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/4/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.txt786d07020b2ee28241094fee26461fcaMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4146http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/5/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.jpgec29a8c727d2bccba30a46e3a099c1d7MD551/216862021-08-05 08:46:58.61oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132021-08-05T11:46:58Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Influence of gender and evaluator experience on post-operative pain perception in bitches and cats |
title |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
spellingShingle |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas Tomio, Jéssica Avaliação de dor Cães Dor aguda Escala de dor Gatos Pain assessment Dogs Acute pain Scale of pain Cats CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
title_short |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
title_full |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
title_fullStr |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
title_sort |
Gênero e experiência do avaliador na percepção de dor pós-operatória em cadelas e gatas |
author |
Tomio, Jéssica |
author_facet |
Tomio, Jéssica |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Soares, André Vasconcelos |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1413221301096456 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Müller, Daniel Curvello de Mendonça |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Pinto Filho, Saulo Tadeu Lemos |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Marília Teresa de |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9479613263400983 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tomio, Jéssica |
contributor_str_mv |
Soares, André Vasconcelos Müller, Daniel Curvello de Mendonça Pinto Filho, Saulo Tadeu Lemos Oliveira, Marília Teresa de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação de dor Cães Dor aguda Escala de dor Gatos |
topic |
Avaliação de dor Cães Dor aguda Escala de dor Gatos Pain assessment Dogs Acute pain Scale of pain Cats CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pain assessment Dogs Acute pain Scale of pain Cats |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA |
description |
Pain should not be overlooked in animals and the effectiveness of its treatment depends on reliable identification and assessment. Although there are studies correlating pain scores with the gender of the evaluator based on the completion of questionnaires, there are no prospective studies of canine and feline pain assessment that confirm these differences. The present study aimed to determine if the gender and the experience of the evaluators interfere with the postoperative pain perception in canines and felines when different pain assessment scales are used. The data were obtained through the analysis of pain assessment forms performed at the Veterinary Hospital of the Federal University of Santa Maria. Sixteen blinded treatment evaluators were randomly assigned to four groups: GMI (inexperienced male group), GME (experienced male group), GFI (inexperienced female group) and GFE (experienced female group). Eighty animals (40 cats and 40 female dogs) were randomly assigned to 2 groups, surgical group (CG) and non-surgical group (CNG). Only the CG group underwent surgical procedure. Pain assessments were performed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Colorado State University Acute Pain Scale (CAPS), Melbourne University Pain Scale (UMPS) and Glasgow Composite Scale (GCMPS) for canines and, EVA, Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale (CAPS-F), Glasgow Composite Climbing (GCMPS-F) and UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Scale (EUNESP) for felines. Baseline evaluation (Mbasal) occurred one hour before the surgical procedure, followed by evaluations after 15 minutes (M1), two hours (M2) and four hours (M3) after discharge from the operating room. A total of 1280 evaluations were performed, being 640 evaluations by species and 320 by evaluator group. Males scored significantly higher than females with CAPS on canines. In felines, gender and treatment interaction was significant for the VAS scale, and experience and treatment interaction was significant for the EVA, EUNESP and GCMPS-F pain assessment scales. It was concluded that the gender and the experience of the evaluators should be considered when choosing the pain evaluation method to be used in these species. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-06 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T17:50:44Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-02T17:50:44Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21686 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21686 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
500500000007 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
a310c02b-b586-4b56-8055-4ba749aaae23 8c68a5e6-0c8d-4809-b213-2b0cd83d3492 50de8566-4794-4e55-acce-01e9baf7b6b0 f8b01873-2d75-4c90-b286-7aec4995fe6a 50a40b8d-c4e9-434e-bbf6-8ca2aa6999fd |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterinária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/1/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/4/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21686/5/DIS_PPGMV_2019_TOMIO_JESSICA.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
a3a880ef4df47092d881a6c00e28bafd 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 786d07020b2ee28241094fee26461fca ec29a8c727d2bccba30a46e3a099c1d7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801223787253858304 |