Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9081 |
Resumo: | We assume that the central focus of epistemology is propositional knowledge (S knows that P). However, since some true beliefs are true by accident, the central question raised by epistemologists is: What becomes a mere true belief into knowledge? There are several answers to this question, many of them conflicting with each other. Among the answers we find two perspectives that compete with each other as the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge, namely, the internalist and externalist perspectives. For the epistemological externalism mind the external factors in the formation of belief. The research aims to discuss some issues that connect externalism a proper way of thinking about truth and what we do when we take a belief to be true. The theoretical discussion will use the externalist perspective of Alvin Goldman seeking a normative theory of justification, assuming that a belief is caused by a reliable process. Goldman, for example, states that the explanation of justified belief is necessary for knowledge and is closely related to it. Asserts that the term "justified" is an evaluative term and any correct definition or synonym for "justified" would also be an evaluative term. Thus, Goldman seeks a normative theory of justification for such a search to specify the conditions for substantive epistemic belief. However, he said conditions should be a non-epistemic, that is, necessary and sufficient conditions that do not involve any epistemic notions. Goldman complains that most of the time it is assumed that someone has a justified belief because that person knows that the belief is justified and know what is the justification. This means that justification is an argument or a set of reasons that can be given in favor of a belief, but it just tells us that the nature of justified belief with regard to what a person might say if asked to defend or justify belief. Instead, Goldman thinks that a belief is justified only by some process or property that makes it justified. |
id |
UFSM-20_3c22a5e788b9ee0cc55436513e9711b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9081 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2009-12-232009-12-232009-08-26RODRIGUES, Emanuele Abreu. Reliability in Alvin Goldman. 2009. 108 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9081We assume that the central focus of epistemology is propositional knowledge (S knows that P). However, since some true beliefs are true by accident, the central question raised by epistemologists is: What becomes a mere true belief into knowledge? There are several answers to this question, many of them conflicting with each other. Among the answers we find two perspectives that compete with each other as the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge, namely, the internalist and externalist perspectives. For the epistemological externalism mind the external factors in the formation of belief. The research aims to discuss some issues that connect externalism a proper way of thinking about truth and what we do when we take a belief to be true. The theoretical discussion will use the externalist perspective of Alvin Goldman seeking a normative theory of justification, assuming that a belief is caused by a reliable process. Goldman, for example, states that the explanation of justified belief is necessary for knowledge and is closely related to it. Asserts that the term "justified" is an evaluative term and any correct definition or synonym for "justified" would also be an evaluative term. Thus, Goldman seeks a normative theory of justification for such a search to specify the conditions for substantive epistemic belief. However, he said conditions should be a non-epistemic, that is, necessary and sufficient conditions that do not involve any epistemic notions. Goldman complains that most of the time it is assumed that someone has a justified belief because that person knows that the belief is justified and know what is the justification. This means that justification is an argument or a set of reasons that can be given in favor of a belief, but it just tells us that the nature of justified belief with regard to what a person might say if asked to defend or justify belief. Instead, Goldman thinks that a belief is justified only by some process or property that makes it justified.Partiremos do pressuposto que o foco central da epistemologia é o conhecimento proposicional (S sabe que P). Entretanto, uma vez que algumas crenças verdadeiras são verdadeiras por acaso, a questão central formulada pelos epistemólogos é a seguinte: O que converte a mera crença verdadeira em conhecimento? Existem diversas respostas para essa questão, muitas delas conflitantes entre si. Entre as respostas encontramos duas perspectivas que competem entre si quanto às condições necessárias e suficientes para o conhecimento, a saber, as perspectivas internalista e externalista. Para o externalismo epistemológico importam os fatores externos na formação da crença. A pesquisa procura discutir algumas questões que conectam o externalismo a uma adequada maneira de pensar sobre a verdade e o que fazemos quando tomamos uma crença como sendo verdadeira. Como referencial teórico utilizaremos a perspectiva externalista de Alvin Goldman que busca uma teoria normativa da justificação, pressupondo que uma crença é originada por um processo confiável. Goldman, por exemplo, afirma que a explicação da crença justificada é necessária para o conhecimento e está intimamente relacionada a ele. Assevera que o termo justificada é um termo valorativo e qualquer definição correta ou sinônimo de justificada seria também um termo valorativo. Assim, Goldman busca uma teoria normativa da justificação, para tal procura especificar as condições substantivas para a crença epistêmica. Contudo, afirma que tais condições deverão ser condições não epistêmicas, isto é, condições necessárias e suficientes que não envolvem quaisquer noções epistêmicas. Goldman critica que na maioria das vezes se assume que alguém tem uma crença justificada porque essa pessoa sabe que a crença é justificada e sabe qual é a justificação. Isso significa dizer que a justificação é um argumento ou um conjunto de razões que podem ser dadas a favor de uma crença, mas isso simplesmente nos diz que a natureza da crença justificada diz respeito ao que uma pessoa poderia dizer se fosse solicitada a defender ou justificar sua crença. Ao contrário, Goldman pensa que uma crença só é justificada através de algum processo ou propriedade que a torna justificada.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBRFilosofiaConhecimento proposicionalJustificaçãoConfiabilismoProcessos confiáveisAlvin GoldmanPropositional knowledgeJustifiedReliabilismTruth worthinessAlvin GoldmanCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAConfiabilismo em Alvin GoldmanReliability in Alvin Goldmaninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisGallina, Albertinho Luizhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0750109262601371Sautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Sartori, Carlos Augustohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6830220445412069http://lattes.cnpq.br/0752179446931202Rodrigues, Emanuele Abreu7001000000044005003005003006dd1762b-d15e-4dab-bf93-1ae6494c41bfe0147ce4-0559-4daa-b1f4-f30e68e94121d15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3420dd786-5b10-4117-a3b4-a2cabe1b2830info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALRODRIGUES, EMANUELE ABREU.PDFapplication/pdf728147http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/1/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDFf0eea0514d2fb573e98163c4bd35271bMD51TEXTRODRIGUES, EMANUELE ABREU.PDF.txtRODRIGUES, EMANUELE ABREU.PDF.txtExtracted texttext/plain250379http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/2/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDF.txt2367a4d8e713a36e27dbef8f1f122537MD52THUMBNAILRODRIGUES, EMANUELE ABREU.PDF.jpgRODRIGUES, EMANUELE ABREU.PDF.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5659http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/3/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDF.jpga5e4dcc9f3b98c537c16570b4d9b7118MD531/90812022-03-18 10:54:19.681oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/9081Repositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-03-18T13:54:19Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Reliability in Alvin Goldman |
title |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
spellingShingle |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman Rodrigues, Emanuele Abreu Conhecimento proposicional Justificação Confiabilismo Processos confiáveis Alvin Goldman Propositional knowledge Justified Reliabilism Truth worthiness Alvin Goldman CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
title_full |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
title_fullStr |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
title_full_unstemmed |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
title_sort |
Confiabilismo em Alvin Goldman |
author |
Rodrigues, Emanuele Abreu |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Emanuele Abreu |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Gallina, Albertinho Luiz |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0750109262601371 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Sartori, Carlos Augusto |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6830220445412069 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0752179446931202 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Emanuele Abreu |
contributor_str_mv |
Gallina, Albertinho Luiz Sautter, Frank Thomas Sartori, Carlos Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Conhecimento proposicional Justificação Confiabilismo Processos confiáveis Alvin Goldman |
topic |
Conhecimento proposicional Justificação Confiabilismo Processos confiáveis Alvin Goldman Propositional knowledge Justified Reliabilism Truth worthiness Alvin Goldman CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Propositional knowledge Justified Reliabilism Truth worthiness Alvin Goldman |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
We assume that the central focus of epistemology is propositional knowledge (S knows that P). However, since some true beliefs are true by accident, the central question raised by epistemologists is: What becomes a mere true belief into knowledge? There are several answers to this question, many of them conflicting with each other. Among the answers we find two perspectives that compete with each other as the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge, namely, the internalist and externalist perspectives. For the epistemological externalism mind the external factors in the formation of belief. The research aims to discuss some issues that connect externalism a proper way of thinking about truth and what we do when we take a belief to be true. The theoretical discussion will use the externalist perspective of Alvin Goldman seeking a normative theory of justification, assuming that a belief is caused by a reliable process. Goldman, for example, states that the explanation of justified belief is necessary for knowledge and is closely related to it. Asserts that the term "justified" is an evaluative term and any correct definition or synonym for "justified" would also be an evaluative term. Thus, Goldman seeks a normative theory of justification for such a search to specify the conditions for substantive epistemic belief. However, he said conditions should be a non-epistemic, that is, necessary and sufficient conditions that do not involve any epistemic notions. Goldman complains that most of the time it is assumed that someone has a justified belief because that person knows that the belief is justified and know what is the justification. This means that justification is an argument or a set of reasons that can be given in favor of a belief, but it just tells us that the nature of justified belief with regard to what a person might say if asked to defend or justify belief. Instead, Goldman thinks that a belief is justified only by some process or property that makes it justified. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-23 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-23 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
RODRIGUES, Emanuele Abreu. Reliability in Alvin Goldman. 2009. 108 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9081 |
identifier_str_mv |
RODRIGUES, Emanuele Abreu. Reliability in Alvin Goldman. 2009. 108 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2009. |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/9081 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
400 500 300 500 300 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
6dd1762b-d15e-4dab-bf93-1ae6494c41bf e0147ce4-0559-4daa-b1f4-f30e68e94121 d15595ec-30a8-4fe2-bde8-addebad0d8f3 420dd786-5b10-4117-a3b4-a2cabe1b2830 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/1/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDF http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/2/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDF.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/9081/3/RODRIGUES%2c%20EMANUELE%20ABREU.PDF.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f0eea0514d2fb573e98163c4bd35271b 2367a4d8e713a36e27dbef8f1f122537 a5e4dcc9f3b98c537c16570b4d9b7118 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1794523789696958464 |