O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Rogério Lopes dos
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19930
Resumo: The present thesis aims at showing that the Stoic conception of human nature emerges as a point of divergence with the epicurean conception of human nature, and that from this divergence we have the cause of the distortion of the Epicurean Ethics made above all by the named ‘early Christian philosophers’. That way, we divided the thesis into three parts: a) the first part is devoted to the presentation and analysis of the concept of Nature in Stoicism, on the following points of investigation: (i) on the way the concept of Nature is conceived in the stoic Philosophy; (ii) on the origins and divergences of Stoic thought regard to the equation between ‘living according to Nature’ and virtuous being; (iii) Stoic criticism as to the enjoyment of pleasure in wise life; b) the second part of the thesis deals with: (i) epicurean physiology; (ii) Epicurus’ conception of the traditional Greek and Stoic religion; (iii) with pleasure and desire (epithymía) developed by Epicurean Ethics. In this second part we are also concerned with highlighting the points of divergence between Epicurean Philosophy and Stoic Philosophy, as well as to justify the claim that the criticisms and “distortions” made by Christian ‘philosophers’ to Epicurean Ethics were constructed under the basis of the criticisms and “distortions” made by the Stoics; (c) The third and last part of the thesis lies precisely on the ‘attack’ made by Christian ‘philosophers’ on Epicurean Ethics, based primarily on Cyrenaic Ethics as if it were Epicurean. In this context the main opponents of Epicureanism in the ascension times of Christianity are analyzed: Clement of Alexandria, Lactantius, Justin Martyr, Jerome of Stridon and Aurelius Ambrosius.
id UFSM-20_74254c0065c25e3f031f3cc3cc52d193
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19930
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str 3913
spelling 2020-08-11T19:20:34Z2020-08-11T19:20:34Z2019-03-08http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19930The present thesis aims at showing that the Stoic conception of human nature emerges as a point of divergence with the epicurean conception of human nature, and that from this divergence we have the cause of the distortion of the Epicurean Ethics made above all by the named ‘early Christian philosophers’. That way, we divided the thesis into three parts: a) the first part is devoted to the presentation and analysis of the concept of Nature in Stoicism, on the following points of investigation: (i) on the way the concept of Nature is conceived in the stoic Philosophy; (ii) on the origins and divergences of Stoic thought regard to the equation between ‘living according to Nature’ and virtuous being; (iii) Stoic criticism as to the enjoyment of pleasure in wise life; b) the second part of the thesis deals with: (i) epicurean physiology; (ii) Epicurus’ conception of the traditional Greek and Stoic religion; (iii) with pleasure and desire (epithymía) developed by Epicurean Ethics. In this second part we are also concerned with highlighting the points of divergence between Epicurean Philosophy and Stoic Philosophy, as well as to justify the claim that the criticisms and “distortions” made by Christian ‘philosophers’ to Epicurean Ethics were constructed under the basis of the criticisms and “distortions” made by the Stoics; (c) The third and last part of the thesis lies precisely on the ‘attack’ made by Christian ‘philosophers’ on Epicurean Ethics, based primarily on Cyrenaic Ethics as if it were Epicurean. In this context the main opponents of Epicureanism in the ascension times of Christianity are analyzed: Clement of Alexandria, Lactantius, Justin Martyr, Jerome of Stridon and Aurelius Ambrosius.A presente tese tem por objetivo evidenciar que a concepção estoica de natureza humana surge como ponto de divergência com a concepção epicurea de natureza humana, e que dessa divergência temos a causa da deturpação da Ética de Epicuro feita, sobretudo, pelos chamados ‘primeiros filósofos cristãos’. Nesse sentido, dividimos a tese em três partes: a) a primeira parte é dedicada à apresentação e análise do conceito de Natureza no Estoicismo, sobre os seguintes pontos de investigação: (i) sobre a forma como o conceito de Natureza é concebido na Filosofia estoica; (ii) sobre as origens e as divergências do pensamento estoico relativo à equiparação entre ‘viver de acordo com a Natureza’ e o ser virtuoso; (iii) sobre a crítica estoica quanto à fruição do prazer na vida sábia; b) a segunda parte da tese se ocupa: (i) com a physiologia epicurea; (ii) com a concepção de Epicuro a respeito da religião tradicional grega e estoica; (iii) com o prazer e o desejo (epithymía) desenvolvido pela Ética epicurea. Ainda nesta segunda parte, nos ocupamos em evidenciar os pontos de divergência existentes entre a Filosofia epicurea e a Filosofia estoica, bem como a justificar a afirmativa segundo a qual as críticas e “deturpações” feitas pelos ‘filósofos’ cristãos à Ética epicurea foram construídas sob a base das críticas e “deturpações” feitas pelos estoicos; c) a terceira e última parte da tese recai justamente sobre o ‘ataque’ feito pelos ‘filósofos’ cristãos à Ética epicurea, valendo-se sobretudo da Ética cirenaica como se fosse epicurea. Neste contexto são analisados os principais opositores do Epicurismo nos tempos de ascensão do Cristianismo: Clemente de Alexandria, Lactâncio, Justino de Nablus, Jerônimo de Estridão e Ambrósio Aurélio.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEpicurismoEstoicismoÉticaNaturezaCirenaismoEpicureanismStoicismEthicNatureCirenaismCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAO conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoicaThe concept of nature as a point of divergence between epicurean ethics and stoic ethicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisSpinelli, Miguelhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4981522004554524Fuente, David Hernandez de lahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-7717Santos, Vladimir Chaves doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3506711960070476Silva, Jose Lourenco Pereira dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8133358460835506Santos, César Schirmer doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4518010795079534http://lattes.cnpq.br/1434912990704229Santos, Rogério Lopes dos7001000000046001c9e7451-85d2-43b0-8a40-6378c85f8d9bd256f7c0-d3db-498b-833a-387d74eba5e36b1016df-1c7f-425a-adec-e312eb4189e10fbaa58f-a6a1-40fe-bfc0-e11c963b330272d3d2a1-7762-4261-aef4-f7597afdf93dfee738ae-afb5-4b85-8d95-80f0635a8dcdreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdfTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdfTese de Doutoradoapplication/pdf1579478http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf348610d20c3396edc8659f0c240b1d2dMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.txtTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain476457http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.txt1549f88fac200e262aab54e5ab779f9aMD54THUMBNAILTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.jpgTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_ SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4141http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.jpgec400ace20f872c2881d9b8d6ca21512MD551/199302020-08-12 03:02:47.056oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132020-08-12T06:02:47Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The concept of nature as a point of divergence between epicurean ethics and stoic ethics
title O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
spellingShingle O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
Santos, Rogério Lopes dos
Epicurismo
Estoicismo
Ética
Natureza
Cirenaismo
Epicureanism
Stoicism
Ethic
Nature
Cirenaism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
title_short O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
title_full O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
title_fullStr O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
title_full_unstemmed O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
title_sort O conceito de natureza como ponto de divergência entre a ética epicurea e a ética estoica
author Santos, Rogério Lopes dos
author_facet Santos, Rogério Lopes dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Spinelli, Miguel
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4981522004554524
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Fuente, David Hernandez de la
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-7717
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Santos, Vladimir Chaves dos
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3506711960070476
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Silva, Jose Lourenco Pereira da
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8133358460835506
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Santos, César Schirmer dos
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4518010795079534
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1434912990704229
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Rogério Lopes dos
contributor_str_mv Spinelli, Miguel
Fuente, David Hernandez de la
Santos, Vladimir Chaves dos
Silva, Jose Lourenco Pereira da
Santos, César Schirmer dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epicurismo
Estoicismo
Ética
Natureza
Cirenaismo
topic Epicurismo
Estoicismo
Ética
Natureza
Cirenaismo
Epicureanism
Stoicism
Ethic
Nature
Cirenaism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Epicureanism
Stoicism
Ethic
Nature
Cirenaism
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
description The present thesis aims at showing that the Stoic conception of human nature emerges as a point of divergence with the epicurean conception of human nature, and that from this divergence we have the cause of the distortion of the Epicurean Ethics made above all by the named ‘early Christian philosophers’. That way, we divided the thesis into three parts: a) the first part is devoted to the presentation and analysis of the concept of Nature in Stoicism, on the following points of investigation: (i) on the way the concept of Nature is conceived in the stoic Philosophy; (ii) on the origins and divergences of Stoic thought regard to the equation between ‘living according to Nature’ and virtuous being; (iii) Stoic criticism as to the enjoyment of pleasure in wise life; b) the second part of the thesis deals with: (i) epicurean physiology; (ii) Epicurus’ conception of the traditional Greek and Stoic religion; (iii) with pleasure and desire (epithymía) developed by Epicurean Ethics. In this second part we are also concerned with highlighting the points of divergence between Epicurean Philosophy and Stoic Philosophy, as well as to justify the claim that the criticisms and “distortions” made by Christian ‘philosophers’ to Epicurean Ethics were constructed under the basis of the criticisms and “distortions” made by the Stoics; (c) The third and last part of the thesis lies precisely on the ‘attack’ made by Christian ‘philosophers’ on Epicurean Ethics, based primarily on Cyrenaic Ethics as if it were Epicurean. In this context the main opponents of Epicureanism in the ascension times of Christianity are analyzed: Clement of Alexandria, Lactantius, Justin Martyr, Jerome of Stridon and Aurelius Ambrosius.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-03-08
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-08-11T19:20:34Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-08-11T19:20:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19930
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19930
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 700100000004
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 1c9e7451-85d2-43b0-8a40-6378c85f8d9b
d256f7c0-d3db-498b-833a-387d74eba5e3
6b1016df-1c7f-425a-adec-e312eb4189e1
0fbaa58f-a6a1-40fe-bfc0-e11c963b3302
72d3d2a1-7762-4261-aef4-f7597afdf93d
fee738ae-afb5-4b85-8d95-80f0635a8dcd
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Filosofia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19930/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2019_%20SANTOS_ROGERIO.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 348610d20c3396edc8659f0c240b1d2d
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
1549f88fac200e262aab54e5ab779f9a
ec400ace20f872c2881d9b8d6ca21512
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801223756300943360