Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131 |
Resumo: | The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow). |
id |
UFSM-20_b0358f9e794c5671058d4b9adfc89cff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19131 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
3913 |
spelling |
2019-12-09T21:33:13Z2019-12-09T21:33:13Z2019-08-16http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow).O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar os efeitos das variações de peso da matriz durante a gestação no desenvolvimento, nas características de carcaça e carne, nos componentes do corpo vazio e no desempenho reprodutivo da progênie. Foram utilizados dados coletados de vacas de corte e sua prole, nascidos entre os anos de 2002 a 2013, terminados em confinamento aos 24 meses de idade no caso dos machos e acasaladas aos 24 meses de idade no caso das fêmeas. Os tratamentos estudados foram: Ganho de peso (GA): vacas gestantes que ganharam de 0,0 a 15,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação; Perda moderada de peso (PM): vacas gestantes que perderam de 0,1 a 15,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação; Perda severa de peso (PS): vacas gestantes que perderam de 15,1 a 30,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação. Os maiores pesos de abate foram obtidos nos tratamentos GA e PM, 428 e 424 kg, respectivamente. O menor peso foi registrado no tratamento PS, 406 kg. A perda de peso moderada e severa durante a gestação aumenta o peso relativo de baço da prole masculina, sendo obtidos pesos relativos de 0,36 e 0,34 kg/100 kg de PCVZ para PM e PS, nessa ordem e 0,29 kg/100 kg de PCVZ para o GA. A participação de rins e intestino no peso de corpo vazio é maior na prole masculina de vacas gestantes que perderam peso de forma severa. O peso relativo de rins foi maior no PS (0,23 kg/100 kg do PCVZ) do que no GA (0,20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) e PM (0,21 kg/100 kg de PCVZ). A variação de peso da vaca durante a gestação não influencia a participação de gordura interna na prole masculina. Aos 210 e aos 365 dias de idade os animais do tratamento GA (135,26 e 211,67 kg) e PM (128,89 e 210,98 kg) apresentaram maior peso do que os animais do PS (119,25 e 197,27 kg). Os pesos de abate e de carcaça quente foram maiores nos animais GA (434 e 240 kg) e PM (433 e 238 kg) do que em relação aos animais do PS (407 e 223 kg). O GA e PM apresentaram carcaças com maior compacidade (1,90 kg cm-1) que o tratamento PS (1,80 kg cm-1). O ganho de peso da vaca durante a gestação aumenta o grau de marmoreio na carne e a área de Longissimus dorsi da prole masculina. A prole feminina de vacas que ganham peso durante a gestação, apresenta maior peso e porcentagem do peso adulto aos 7 e 18 meses de idade. Na primeira estação reprodutiva, o PS apresentou tendência de maior taxa de prenhez (69,8%). Já o GA e PM apresentaram tendência de menor taxa de prenhez (50,0 e 59,9 %). Na segunda estação reprodutiva, a prole de vacas que perderam peso de forma mais acentuada apresenta maior peso ao nascer dos bezerros. Na terceira estação reprodutiva, o GA apresentou tendência de maior taxa de prenhez (64,3%), menor eficiência produtiva (13,5 kg de bezerros/ kg de vaca) e maior índice de produção de bezerros (57,7 kg de bezerro/vaca).Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUFSMBrasilZootecniaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarcaçaCarneNutrição fetalÓrgão vitaisReproduçãoCarcassMeatFetal nutritionReproductionVital organsCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAProgramação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênieFetal programming: impacts of cow weight variation on your progenyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisAlves Filho, Dari Celestinohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2140386505744337Silveira, Magali Floriano dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7618829620378519Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metzhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3921011577858890Pascoal, Leonir Luízhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6500944541004301Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damianhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9463866484065885http://lattes.cnpq.br/4019812794231388Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva500400000002600e80896c6-107c-4173-83b3-2f62810c5f9cad7d8195-e481-4066-a09c-686b43c32d8ff7653d0c-db08-44ae-a8de-3ed78cd23d6bf68fc3ed-2a5b-4b68-80f4-29ad8d379b71ae5dd3b2-0a6d-4a65-b6df-285294de95b6e051d5c8-fb70-4ecc-936b-dc6fe252daf8reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfTese de Doutoradoapplication/pdf1282600http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/1/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfd2e6708a84a3a3dc2b862f4b621aaaffMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txtTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain217425http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/4/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txt66057b1b1ea0946029d37175d8572c89MD54THUMBNAILTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpgTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4453http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/5/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpge209664b22fe9a85e3be54aa99f19517MD551/191312019-12-10 03:02:57.885oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132019-12-10T06:02:57Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Fetal programming: impacts of cow weight variation on your progeny |
title |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
spellingShingle |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva Carcaça Carne Nutrição fetal Órgão vitais Reprodução Carcass Meat Fetal nutrition Reproduction Vital organs CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA |
title_short |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
title_full |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
title_fullStr |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
title_sort |
Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie |
author |
Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Alves Filho, Dari Celestino |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2140386505744337 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Magali Floriano da |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7618829620378519 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metz |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3921011577858890 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Pascoal, Leonir Luíz |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6500944541004301 |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damian |
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9463866484065885 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4019812794231388 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva |
contributor_str_mv |
Alves Filho, Dari Celestino Silveira, Magali Floriano da Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metz Pascoal, Leonir Luíz Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carcaça Carne Nutrição fetal Órgão vitais Reprodução |
topic |
Carcaça Carne Nutrição fetal Órgão vitais Reprodução Carcass Meat Fetal nutrition Reproduction Vital organs CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Carcass Meat Fetal nutrition Reproduction Vital organs |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA |
description |
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow). |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-09T21:33:13Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-09T21:33:13Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
500400000002 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
e80896c6-107c-4173-83b3-2f62810c5f9c ad7d8195-e481-4066-a09c-686b43c32d8f f7653d0c-db08-44ae-a8de-3ed78cd23d6b f68fc3ed-2a5b-4b68-80f4-29ad8d379b71 ae5dd3b2-0a6d-4a65-b6df-285294de95b6 e051d5c8-fb70-4ecc-936b-dc6fe252daf8 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Rurais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/1/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/4/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/5/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d2e6708a84a3a3dc2b862f4b621aaaff 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 66057b1b1ea0946029d37175d8572c89 e209664b22fe9a85e3be54aa99f19517 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801223824057827328 |