Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fipke, Glauber Monçon
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5150
Resumo: New technologies are intended to assist the farmer in the inoculation process, as is the case of antecipated inoculation (pre-inoculation) provided by using osmoprotectors. In search of higher yields, the kind of inoculation and management with nitrogen fertilizer also need to be clarified. In this study, two experiments were conducted to evaluate the agronomic performance of two inoculation strategies with Bradyrhizobium alone (conventional inoculation) or combined with Azsopirillum brasilense (co-inoculation). The first experiment, we evaluated the pre-inoculation (0, 7 and 10 days before seeding). The second experiment evaluated the response to supply urea (0, 75 and 150 kg N ha-1) split into two periods of three soybeans cultivars development stage (BMX Ativa RR, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência RR). We evaluated the interaction of nodulation, of morphophysiological components and grain yield at conditions of Santa Maria. Co-inoculation and conventional inoculation, both plus an osmoprotectors, showed increases in grain yield relative to treatment not inoculated 31 and 25%, respectively. With seven days before to sowing, use of osmoprotectors for both types of inoculation, did not differ statistically from the other treatments inoculated the same day of sowing. Co-inoculation provided increment in grain yield of 240 kg ha-1 compared to conventional inoculation. BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência when co-inoculated showed increases in grain yield 6, 4 e 12%, respectively. The addition of 150 kg N ha-1 for the two indeterminate cultivars had an increases, but without economic return. The cultivars tested when inoculated conventionally not respond positively to the application of urea. Therefore, these results confirm the effectiveness of the use osmoprotectores and co-inoculation ond the seeds and low economic returns provided by the use of nitrogen fertilizer. It emphasizes the use of activation and protection substances on rhizobial inoculants for the formulation, as well as more studies concerning the efficiency of co-inoculation with rhizobacteria promote plant growth to obtain higher yields.
id UFSM-20_c0c88d7119d48e5dba95be4862b08f14
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/5150
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str 3913
spelling 2017-05-082017-05-082015-07-17FIPKE, Glauber Monçon. Co-inoculation and pre-inoculation of soybean seed. 2015. 67 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2015.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5150New technologies are intended to assist the farmer in the inoculation process, as is the case of antecipated inoculation (pre-inoculation) provided by using osmoprotectors. In search of higher yields, the kind of inoculation and management with nitrogen fertilizer also need to be clarified. In this study, two experiments were conducted to evaluate the agronomic performance of two inoculation strategies with Bradyrhizobium alone (conventional inoculation) or combined with Azsopirillum brasilense (co-inoculation). The first experiment, we evaluated the pre-inoculation (0, 7 and 10 days before seeding). The second experiment evaluated the response to supply urea (0, 75 and 150 kg N ha-1) split into two periods of three soybeans cultivars development stage (BMX Ativa RR, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência RR). We evaluated the interaction of nodulation, of morphophysiological components and grain yield at conditions of Santa Maria. Co-inoculation and conventional inoculation, both plus an osmoprotectors, showed increases in grain yield relative to treatment not inoculated 31 and 25%, respectively. With seven days before to sowing, use of osmoprotectors for both types of inoculation, did not differ statistically from the other treatments inoculated the same day of sowing. Co-inoculation provided increment in grain yield of 240 kg ha-1 compared to conventional inoculation. BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência when co-inoculated showed increases in grain yield 6, 4 e 12%, respectively. The addition of 150 kg N ha-1 for the two indeterminate cultivars had an increases, but without economic return. The cultivars tested when inoculated conventionally not respond positively to the application of urea. Therefore, these results confirm the effectiveness of the use osmoprotectores and co-inoculation ond the seeds and low economic returns provided by the use of nitrogen fertilizer. It emphasizes the use of activation and protection substances on rhizobial inoculants for the formulation, as well as more studies concerning the efficiency of co-inoculation with rhizobacteria promote plant growth to obtain higher yields.Novas tecnologias têm surgido para auxiliar o agricultor no processo de inoculação, como é o caso da pré-incoulação (inoculação antecipada) possibilitada pelo uso de osmoprotetores. Na busca por produtividades superiores, o tipo de inoculação e o manejo com fertilizante nitrogenado também precisam ser melhor esclarecidos. No presente trabalho, foram conduzidos dois experimentos para avaliar o desempenho agronômico de duas estratégias de inoculação com bactérias do gênero Bradyrhizobium isoladamente (inoculação convencional) ou combinadas com Azospirillum brasilense (co-inoculação). O primeiro experimento, testou a pré-inoculação (0, 7 e 10 dias anteriores à semeadura). O segundo experimento, testou à resposta ao fornecimento de ureia (0, 75 e 150 kg de N ha-1) fracionado em dois momentos do estádio de desenvolvimento de três cultivares de soja (BMX Ativa RR, TEC 6029 IPRO e BMX Potência RR). Avaliou-se os componentes da nodulação, morfofisiológicos e da produtividade de grãos nas condições edafoclimáticas de Santa Maria. A co-inoculação e a inoculação convencional, ambas acrescidas do osmoprotetor, apresentaram acréscimos na produção de grãos em relação ao tratamento não inoculado de 31 e 25%, respectivamente. Com sete dias anteriores à semeadura, o uso do osmoprotetor para os dois tipos de inoculação, não diferiu estatisticamente dos demais tratamentos inoculados no mesmo dia da semeadura. A co-inoculação proporcionou incremento na produtividade de grãos de 240 kg ha-1 quando comparado à inoculação convencional. Os cultivares BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 e BMX Potência quando co-inoculadas apresentaram incrementos na produtividade de 6, 4 e 12% respectivamente. Com a adição de 150 kg de N ha-1, os dois cultivares indeterminados apresentaram incremento na produtividade de 300 kg ha-1, porém, sem retorno econômico. Os cultivares testados quando inoculados convencionalmente não respondem positivamente à aplicação de ureia. Portanto, esses resultados confirmam a eficácia do uso de osmoprotetores e co-inoculação de sementes e o baixo retorno econômico proporcionado pelo uso de fertilizante nitrogenado. Enfatiza-se o uso de substâncias de ativação e proteção para os rizóbios na formulação de inoculantes, assim como, mais estudos quanto a eficiência da co-inoculação com rizobactérias promotoras de crescimento de plantas para obtenção de maiores produtividades.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFSMBRAgronomiaAzospirillum brasilenseBradyrhizobium spp.Bactérias diazotróficasGlicine max (L) Merr.NitrogênioAzospirillum brasilenseBradyrhizobium spp.DiazotrophsNitrogenCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIACo-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em sojaCo-inoculation and pre-inoculation of soybean seedinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisMartin, Thomas Newtonhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6293291442552572Santi, Antônio Luishttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6223011493102530http://lattes.cnpq.br/4796611831477534Fipke, Glauber Monçon5001000000094005003005009e1c6638-c7fe-4365-a605-30d9ac89ada6522560dd-acf8-4aa5-ad5f-0b26132453ec394abd59-c011-44b2-b826-69a6fa9751bainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALFIPKE, GLAUBER MONCON.pdfapplication/pdf1694951http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/1/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf9e6e15e500e73e9227ae9f392fea95a4MD51TEXTFIPKE, GLAUBER MONCON.pdf.txtFIPKE, GLAUBER MONCON.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain138923http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/2/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf.txt49f2709fc5e899394031564b3fcfd483MD52THUMBNAILFIPKE, GLAUBER MONCON.pdf.jpgFIPKE, GLAUBER MONCON.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4591http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/3/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf.jpg5dc9bf6c116b5c6856502e1bacfd7fb0MD531/51502022-05-02 14:36:58.825oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/5150Repositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-05-02T17:36:58Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Co-inoculation and pre-inoculation of soybean seed
title Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
spellingShingle Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
Fipke, Glauber Monçon
Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Bactérias diazotróficas
Glicine max (L) Merr.
Nitrogênio
Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Diazotrophs
Nitrogen
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
title_full Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
title_fullStr Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
title_full_unstemmed Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
title_sort Co-inoculação e pré-inoculação de sementes em soja
author Fipke, Glauber Monçon
author_facet Fipke, Glauber Monçon
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Martin, Thomas Newton
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6293291442552572
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Santi, Antônio Luis
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6223011493102530
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4796611831477534
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fipke, Glauber Monçon
contributor_str_mv Martin, Thomas Newton
Santi, Antônio Luis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Bactérias diazotróficas
Glicine max (L) Merr.
Nitrogênio
topic Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Bactérias diazotróficas
Glicine max (L) Merr.
Nitrogênio
Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Diazotrophs
Nitrogen
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Azospirillum brasilense
Bradyrhizobium spp.
Diazotrophs
Nitrogen
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description New technologies are intended to assist the farmer in the inoculation process, as is the case of antecipated inoculation (pre-inoculation) provided by using osmoprotectors. In search of higher yields, the kind of inoculation and management with nitrogen fertilizer also need to be clarified. In this study, two experiments were conducted to evaluate the agronomic performance of two inoculation strategies with Bradyrhizobium alone (conventional inoculation) or combined with Azsopirillum brasilense (co-inoculation). The first experiment, we evaluated the pre-inoculation (0, 7 and 10 days before seeding). The second experiment evaluated the response to supply urea (0, 75 and 150 kg N ha-1) split into two periods of three soybeans cultivars development stage (BMX Ativa RR, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência RR). We evaluated the interaction of nodulation, of morphophysiological components and grain yield at conditions of Santa Maria. Co-inoculation and conventional inoculation, both plus an osmoprotectors, showed increases in grain yield relative to treatment not inoculated 31 and 25%, respectively. With seven days before to sowing, use of osmoprotectors for both types of inoculation, did not differ statistically from the other treatments inoculated the same day of sowing. Co-inoculation provided increment in grain yield of 240 kg ha-1 compared to conventional inoculation. BMX Ativa, TEC 6029 IPRO and BMX Potência when co-inoculated showed increases in grain yield 6, 4 e 12%, respectively. The addition of 150 kg N ha-1 for the two indeterminate cultivars had an increases, but without economic return. The cultivars tested when inoculated conventionally not respond positively to the application of urea. Therefore, these results confirm the effectiveness of the use osmoprotectores and co-inoculation ond the seeds and low economic returns provided by the use of nitrogen fertilizer. It emphasizes the use of activation and protection substances on rhizobial inoculants for the formulation, as well as more studies concerning the efficiency of co-inoculation with rhizobacteria promote plant growth to obtain higher yields.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015-07-17
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-05-08
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-05-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FIPKE, Glauber Monçon. Co-inoculation and pre-inoculation of soybean seed. 2015. 67 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2015.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5150
identifier_str_mv FIPKE, Glauber Monçon. Co-inoculation and pre-inoculation of soybean seed. 2015. 67 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2015.
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5150
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500100000009
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 400
500
300
500
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 9e1c6638-c7fe-4365-a605-30d9ac89ada6
522560dd-acf8-4aa5-ad5f-0b26132453ec
394abd59-c011-44b2-b826-69a6fa9751ba
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/1/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/2/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5150/3/FIPKE%2c%20GLAUBER%20MONCON.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 9e6e15e500e73e9227ae9f392fea95a4
49f2709fc5e899394031564b3fcfd483
5dc9bf6c116b5c6856502e1bacfd7fb0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801223753951084544