In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martínez-Martínez,Sonia
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Yubero-Delgado,Sheila, Rodríguez-Ferri,Elías-Fernando, Frandoloso,Rafael, Álvarez-Estrada,Álvaro, Gutiérrez-Martín,César-Bernardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000801438
Resumo: ABSTRACT The efficacy of 28 individual or blended disinfectants against avian Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains was determined. An in vitro test in the presence and absence of serum as source of organic material was conducted. Povidone-iodine (releasing 1% available iodine), 1% potassium permanganate, 70% ethanol, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and three commercial formulations based on quaternary ammonium compounds + formaldehyde or cresol derivates were the most effective against all strains tested and reduced bacterial counts by more than 106 times (6-log10) regardless of the presence of organic matter. These commercial compounds as well as ethanol and chlorhexidine among the individual substances tested might be helpful in the adoption of environmental control measures against these two enterobacteria in poultry industry.
id UFSM-2_08bb03c1fbb9702493a0742e68d5fcbc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782016000801438
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry Salmonella enterica serovar EnteritidisEscherichia colidisinfectionsuspension testpoultry industryABSTRACT The efficacy of 28 individual or blended disinfectants against avian Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains was determined. An in vitro test in the presence and absence of serum as source of organic material was conducted. Povidone-iodine (releasing 1% available iodine), 1% potassium permanganate, 70% ethanol, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and three commercial formulations based on quaternary ammonium compounds + formaldehyde or cresol derivates were the most effective against all strains tested and reduced bacterial counts by more than 106 times (6-log10) regardless of the presence of organic matter. These commercial compounds as well as ethanol and chlorhexidine among the individual substances tested might be helpful in the adoption of environmental control measures against these two enterobacteria in poultry industry.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000801438Ciência Rural v.46 n.8 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20151288info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartínez-Martínez,SoniaYubero-Delgado,SheilaRodríguez-Ferri,Elías-FernandoFrandoloso,RafaelÁlvarez-Estrada,ÁlvaroGutiérrez-Martín,César-Bernardoeng2016-06-20T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
title In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
spellingShingle In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
Martínez-Martínez,Sonia
Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
Escherichia coli
disinfection
suspension test
poultry industry
title_short In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
title_full In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
title_fullStr In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
title_full_unstemmed In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
title_sort In vitro efficacy of several disinfectants against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains from poultry
author Martínez-Martínez,Sonia
author_facet Martínez-Martínez,Sonia
Yubero-Delgado,Sheila
Rodríguez-Ferri,Elías-Fernando
Frandoloso,Rafael
Álvarez-Estrada,Álvaro
Gutiérrez-Martín,César-Bernardo
author_role author
author2 Yubero-Delgado,Sheila
Rodríguez-Ferri,Elías-Fernando
Frandoloso,Rafael
Álvarez-Estrada,Álvaro
Gutiérrez-Martín,César-Bernardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martínez-Martínez,Sonia
Yubero-Delgado,Sheila
Rodríguez-Ferri,Elías-Fernando
Frandoloso,Rafael
Álvarez-Estrada,Álvaro
Gutiérrez-Martín,César-Bernardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
Escherichia coli
disinfection
suspension test
poultry industry
topic Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
Escherichia coli
disinfection
suspension test
poultry industry
description ABSTRACT The efficacy of 28 individual or blended disinfectants against avian Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Escherichia coli strains was determined. An in vitro test in the presence and absence of serum as source of organic material was conducted. Povidone-iodine (releasing 1% available iodine), 1% potassium permanganate, 70% ethanol, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate and three commercial formulations based on quaternary ammonium compounds + formaldehyde or cresol derivates were the most effective against all strains tested and reduced bacterial counts by more than 106 times (6-log10) regardless of the presence of organic matter. These commercial compounds as well as ethanol and chlorhexidine among the individual substances tested might be helpful in the adoption of environmental control measures against these two enterobacteria in poultry industry.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000801438
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000801438
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151288
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.46 n.8 2016
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140550471122944

Registros relacionados