Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vogelmann,Eduardo Saldanha
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Reichert,José Miguel, Prevedello,Juliana, Awe,Gabriel Oladele, Reinert,Dalvan José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000200260
Resumo: Hydrophobic or water repellent soils slowly absorb water because of the low wett ability of the soil particles which are coated with hydrophobic organic substances. These pose significant effects on plant growth, water infiltration and retention, surface runoff and erosion. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of tension micro-infiltrometer(TMI) and the water drop penetration time (WDPT) methods in the determination of the hydrophobicity index of eighteen soils from southern Brazil. Soil samples were collected from the 0-5cm soil layer to determine particle size distribution, organic matter content, hydrophobicity index of soil aggregates and droplet penetration time of disaggregated and sieved soil samples. For the TMI method the soil samples were subjected to minor changes due to the use of macroaggregates to preserve the distribution of solid constituents in the soil. Due to the homogeneity of the soil samples the WDPT method gave smaller coefficients of variation unlike the TMI method where the soil structure is preserved. However, both methods had low coefficients of variation, and are thus effective for determining the soil hydrophobicity, especially when the log hydrophobicity index or log WDPT is >1.
id UFSM-2_248f06ed4a8d3db3dcd8673f5f04e191
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782015000200260
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methodswater repellencywater drop penetration timewater infiltration.Hydrophobic or water repellent soils slowly absorb water because of the low wett ability of the soil particles which are coated with hydrophobic organic substances. These pose significant effects on plant growth, water infiltration and retention, surface runoff and erosion. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of tension micro-infiltrometer(TMI) and the water drop penetration time (WDPT) methods in the determination of the hydrophobicity index of eighteen soils from southern Brazil. Soil samples were collected from the 0-5cm soil layer to determine particle size distribution, organic matter content, hydrophobicity index of soil aggregates and droplet penetration time of disaggregated and sieved soil samples. For the TMI method the soil samples were subjected to minor changes due to the use of macroaggregates to preserve the distribution of solid constituents in the soil. Due to the homogeneity of the soil samples the WDPT method gave smaller coefficients of variation unlike the TMI method where the soil structure is preserved. However, both methods had low coefficients of variation, and are thus effective for determining the soil hydrophobicity, especially when the log hydrophobicity index or log WDPT is >1.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000200260Ciência Rural v.45 n.2 2015reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20140042info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVogelmann,Eduardo SaldanhaReichert,José MiguelPrevedello,JulianaAwe,Gabriel OladeleReinert,Dalvan Joséeng2015-03-03T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
title Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
spellingShingle Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
Vogelmann,Eduardo Saldanha
water repellency
water drop penetration time
water infiltration.
title_short Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
title_full Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
title_fullStr Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
title_full_unstemmed Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
title_sort Soil hydrophobicity: comparative study of usual determination methods
author Vogelmann,Eduardo Saldanha
author_facet Vogelmann,Eduardo Saldanha
Reichert,José Miguel
Prevedello,Juliana
Awe,Gabriel Oladele
Reinert,Dalvan José
author_role author
author2 Reichert,José Miguel
Prevedello,Juliana
Awe,Gabriel Oladele
Reinert,Dalvan José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vogelmann,Eduardo Saldanha
Reichert,José Miguel
Prevedello,Juliana
Awe,Gabriel Oladele
Reinert,Dalvan José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv water repellency
water drop penetration time
water infiltration.
topic water repellency
water drop penetration time
water infiltration.
description Hydrophobic or water repellent soils slowly absorb water because of the low wett ability of the soil particles which are coated with hydrophobic organic substances. These pose significant effects on plant growth, water infiltration and retention, surface runoff and erosion. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of tension micro-infiltrometer(TMI) and the water drop penetration time (WDPT) methods in the determination of the hydrophobicity index of eighteen soils from southern Brazil. Soil samples were collected from the 0-5cm soil layer to determine particle size distribution, organic matter content, hydrophobicity index of soil aggregates and droplet penetration time of disaggregated and sieved soil samples. For the TMI method the soil samples were subjected to minor changes due to the use of macroaggregates to preserve the distribution of solid constituents in the soil. Due to the homogeneity of the soil samples the WDPT method gave smaller coefficients of variation unlike the TMI method where the soil structure is preserved. However, both methods had low coefficients of variation, and are thus effective for determining the soil hydrophobicity, especially when the log hydrophobicity index or log WDPT is >1.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000200260
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000200260
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20140042
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.45 n.2 2015
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140546735046656