Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000900251 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Composting and vermicomposting before addition to the soil is a viable alternative to the disposal of cattle manure. However, this residue has been used in the untreated form for seedling production. This study evaluated the use of cattle manure in natura, and the organic composted or vermicomposted variants of cattle manure on substrates used in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings. The treatments consisted of substrates formulated by mixing the organic fertilizers with washed sand in 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 (v/v) percentages, compared to a commercial substrate. The E. urograndis seedlings were grown in tubes in a greenhouse and evaluated after 120 days for shoot and root dry weights, plant height, stem diameter, shoot/root ratio, and Dickson quality index. The substrate formulated from a mixture of 80% (v/v) of cattle manure in natura and washed sand allows for better development in Eucalyptus seedlings. Substrate containing 100% bovine manure vermicompost or organic compost produced seedlings with lower quality than in natura bovine manure but superior to the commercial substrate. Due to the health risks associated with use of untreated bovine manure, organic compost and vermicompost are good alternatives for the production of E. urograndis seedlings. |
id |
UFSM-2_2b7f9e495d68143e78bca052f7923826 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782021000900251 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlingsorganic wasteorganic fertilizerssubstrateeucalyptusseedling qualityABSTRACT: Composting and vermicomposting before addition to the soil is a viable alternative to the disposal of cattle manure. However, this residue has been used in the untreated form for seedling production. This study evaluated the use of cattle manure in natura, and the organic composted or vermicomposted variants of cattle manure on substrates used in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings. The treatments consisted of substrates formulated by mixing the organic fertilizers with washed sand in 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 (v/v) percentages, compared to a commercial substrate. The E. urograndis seedlings were grown in tubes in a greenhouse and evaluated after 120 days for shoot and root dry weights, plant height, stem diameter, shoot/root ratio, and Dickson quality index. The substrate formulated from a mixture of 80% (v/v) of cattle manure in natura and washed sand allows for better development in Eucalyptus seedlings. Substrate containing 100% bovine manure vermicompost or organic compost produced seedlings with lower quality than in natura bovine manure but superior to the commercial substrate. Due to the health risks associated with use of untreated bovine manure, organic compost and vermicompost are good alternatives for the production of E. urograndis seedlings.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000900251Ciência Rural v.51 n.9 2021reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200600info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEckhardt,Daniel PazziniSantana,Natielo AlmeidaSouza,Eduardo Lorensi deFerreira,Paulo Ademar AvelarAntoniolli,Zaida InêsMartin,Jorge DomínguezJacques,Rodrigo Josemar Seminotieng2021-05-24T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
title |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings Eckhardt,Daniel Pazzini organic waste organic fertilizers substrate eucalyptus seedling quality |
title_short |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
title_full |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
title_sort |
Comparison between cattle manure, organic compost, and vermicompost in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings |
author |
Eckhardt,Daniel Pazzini |
author_facet |
Eckhardt,Daniel Pazzini Santana,Natielo Almeida Souza,Eduardo Lorensi de Ferreira,Paulo Ademar Avelar Antoniolli,Zaida Inês Martin,Jorge Domínguez Jacques,Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santana,Natielo Almeida Souza,Eduardo Lorensi de Ferreira,Paulo Ademar Avelar Antoniolli,Zaida Inês Martin,Jorge Domínguez Jacques,Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Eckhardt,Daniel Pazzini Santana,Natielo Almeida Souza,Eduardo Lorensi de Ferreira,Paulo Ademar Avelar Antoniolli,Zaida Inês Martin,Jorge Domínguez Jacques,Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
organic waste organic fertilizers substrate eucalyptus seedling quality |
topic |
organic waste organic fertilizers substrate eucalyptus seedling quality |
description |
ABSTRACT: Composting and vermicomposting before addition to the soil is a viable alternative to the disposal of cattle manure. However, this residue has been used in the untreated form for seedling production. This study evaluated the use of cattle manure in natura, and the organic composted or vermicomposted variants of cattle manure on substrates used in the production of Eucalyptus urograndis seedlings. The treatments consisted of substrates formulated by mixing the organic fertilizers with washed sand in 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 (v/v) percentages, compared to a commercial substrate. The E. urograndis seedlings were grown in tubes in a greenhouse and evaluated after 120 days for shoot and root dry weights, plant height, stem diameter, shoot/root ratio, and Dickson quality index. The substrate formulated from a mixture of 80% (v/v) of cattle manure in natura and washed sand allows for better development in Eucalyptus seedlings. Substrate containing 100% bovine manure vermicompost or organic compost produced seedlings with lower quality than in natura bovine manure but superior to the commercial substrate. Due to the health risks associated with use of untreated bovine manure, organic compost and vermicompost are good alternatives for the production of E. urograndis seedlings. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000900251 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000900251 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20200600 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.51 n.9 2021 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140556113510400 |