Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martinez,Diana Elina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Aguirre,Nerina, Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini, Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.
id UFSM-2_52f1e49f79d79d026bec1dbf361567fc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782021001100452
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)brucellosisbuffaloesserological diagnosisABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452Ciência Rural v.51 n.11 2021reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200959info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinez,Diana ElinaAguirre,NerinaGalarza,María Fabiana CipoliniEchaide,Susana Marta Torioni deeng2021-07-05T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
title Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
spellingShingle Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
Martinez,Diana Elina
brucellosis
buffaloes
serological diagnosis
title_short Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
title_full Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
title_fullStr Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
title_full_unstemmed Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
title_sort Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
author Martinez,Diana Elina
author_facet Martinez,Diana Elina
Aguirre,Nerina
Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini
Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de
author_role author
author2 Aguirre,Nerina
Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini
Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martinez,Diana Elina
Aguirre,Nerina
Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini
Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv brucellosis
buffaloes
serological diagnosis
topic brucellosis
buffaloes
serological diagnosis
description ABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200959
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.51 n.11 2021
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140556179570688