Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species. |
id |
UFSM-2_52f1e49f79d79d026bec1dbf361567fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782021001100452 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)brucellosisbuffaloesserological diagnosisABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452Ciência Rural v.51 n.11 2021reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200959info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinez,Diana ElinaAguirre,NerinaGalarza,María Fabiana CipoliniEchaide,Susana Marta Torioni deeng2021-07-05T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
title |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
spellingShingle |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) Martinez,Diana Elina brucellosis buffaloes serological diagnosis |
title_short |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_full |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_fullStr |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_sort |
Fluorescent polarization assay, two versions of indirect and competitive enzyme- linked immunoassay for brucellosis diagnosis in vaccinated buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) |
author |
Martinez,Diana Elina |
author_facet |
Martinez,Diana Elina Aguirre,Nerina Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aguirre,Nerina Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martinez,Diana Elina Aguirre,Nerina Galarza,María Fabiana Cipolini Echaide,Susana Marta Torioni de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
brucellosis buffaloes serological diagnosis |
topic |
brucellosis buffaloes serological diagnosis |
description |
ABSTRACT: The fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), two variants (V) of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA) were evaluated in buffaloes to detect antibodies against Brucella spp. The V1 of I-ELISA identifies them through the monoclonal (M23) anti-bovine IgG (I-ELISAM23) and the V2 through the ProteinA / G (I-ELISA-A/G). Serum samples of 862 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from the Northeast of Argentina (NEA) were analyzed using the complement fixation test (CFT) as the reference. Receiving Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis defined for the area under the curve (AUC) determined the cutoff points, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test. CFT identified 107 positive and 755 negative sera. The best AUC (0.986), Concordance with CFT (96.3%) and kappa value (0.843) was obtained by I-ELISA A/G test. This assay showed the highest Se (95.33%) and C-ELISA the highest Sp (97%). FPA failed to measure the antibodies in 23 (2.65%) serum samples due to unsuccessful reading. I-ELISA M23 proved to be ineffective to diagnose brucellosis in bubaline sera. The four serological tests showed cutoff points lower than those standardized for bovines. As conclusion, I-ELISA A/G, C-ELISA and FPA with its limitations would be effective techniques for the diagnosis of brucellosis in buffaloes in the NEA, requiring an appropriate cut-off point to guarantee their maximum performance in this species. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021001100452 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20200959 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.51 n.11 2021 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140556179570688 |