Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Makino,Herica
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco, Fujimori,Mahyumi, Rodrigues,Juliana Yuki, Dias,Alvaro Felipe Lima Ruy, Dutra,Valéria, Nakazato,Luciano, Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000200310
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the DNA detection of Ehrlichia canis in blood and bone marrow to determine the prevalence of the agent in Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso. Blood samples and bone marrow from 80 dogs of both sexes, different breeds and age, were collected and processed for a cross-sectional study performed using nested PCR. Of the 80 dogs, 61 (76.3%) had E. canis DNA in one of the samples. The buffy coat was positive in 42 dogs (52.5%) and the bone marrow was positive in 33 (41.3%). There was no significant association between the positive biological samples of either the buffy coat or bone marrow and the presence or absence of clinical signs (P=0.49). No risk factor was associated with infection in the studied area. The bone marrow samples were efficient for the molecular diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis, particularly when there was a negative blood sample, although infection was present.
id UFSM-2_6647422cf10b5c2615aa5d806b1a0880
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782016000200310
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samplescanine ehrlichiosisdiagnosisnested PCRbiological samples.ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the DNA detection of Ehrlichia canis in blood and bone marrow to determine the prevalence of the agent in Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso. Blood samples and bone marrow from 80 dogs of both sexes, different breeds and age, were collected and processed for a cross-sectional study performed using nested PCR. Of the 80 dogs, 61 (76.3%) had E. canis DNA in one of the samples. The buffy coat was positive in 42 dogs (52.5%) and the bone marrow was positive in 33 (41.3%). There was no significant association between the positive biological samples of either the buffy coat or bone marrow and the presence or absence of clinical signs (P=0.49). No risk factor was associated with infection in the studied area. The bone marrow samples were efficient for the molecular diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis, particularly when there was a negative blood sample, although infection was present.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000200310Ciência Rural v.46 n.2 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20150090info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMakino,HericaSousa,Valéria Régia FrancoFujimori,MahyumiRodrigues,Juliana YukiDias,Alvaro Felipe Lima RuyDutra,ValériaNakazato,LucianoAlmeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira deeng2016-02-26T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
title Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
spellingShingle Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
Makino,Herica
canine ehrlichiosis
diagnosis
nested PCR
biological samples.
title_short Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
title_full Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
title_fullStr Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
title_full_unstemmed Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
title_sort Ehrlichia canis detection in dogs from Várzea Grande: a comparative analysis of blood and bone marrow samples
author Makino,Herica
author_facet Makino,Herica
Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco
Fujimori,Mahyumi
Rodrigues,Juliana Yuki
Dias,Alvaro Felipe Lima Ruy
Dutra,Valéria
Nakazato,Luciano
Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de
author_role author
author2 Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco
Fujimori,Mahyumi
Rodrigues,Juliana Yuki
Dias,Alvaro Felipe Lima Ruy
Dutra,Valéria
Nakazato,Luciano
Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Makino,Herica
Sousa,Valéria Régia Franco
Fujimori,Mahyumi
Rodrigues,Juliana Yuki
Dias,Alvaro Felipe Lima Ruy
Dutra,Valéria
Nakazato,Luciano
Almeida,Arleana do Bom Parto Ferreira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv canine ehrlichiosis
diagnosis
nested PCR
biological samples.
topic canine ehrlichiosis
diagnosis
nested PCR
biological samples.
description ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to compare the DNA detection of Ehrlichia canis in blood and bone marrow to determine the prevalence of the agent in Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso. Blood samples and bone marrow from 80 dogs of both sexes, different breeds and age, were collected and processed for a cross-sectional study performed using nested PCR. Of the 80 dogs, 61 (76.3%) had E. canis DNA in one of the samples. The buffy coat was positive in 42 dogs (52.5%) and the bone marrow was positive in 33 (41.3%). There was no significant association between the positive biological samples of either the buffy coat or bone marrow and the presence or absence of clinical signs (P=0.49). No risk factor was associated with infection in the studied area. The bone marrow samples were efficient for the molecular diagnosis of canine ehrlichiosis, particularly when there was a negative blood sample, although infection was present.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000200310
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000200310
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150090
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.46 n.2 2016
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140548631920640