Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000700401 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Rootstocks are widely used in viticulture due to their resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Additionally, rootstocks can affect vine growth and fruit quality. This study evaluated the compatibility and initial developmental of the ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks The wedge graft technique on woody cuttings was utilized. The percentage of survival ranged from 0% (‘VR043-43’) to 98.33% (‘101-14 MGT’), and the rootstock were grouped into three distinct groups. ‘IAC 313 Tropical’ and ‘SO4’ rootstocks were those ones with the highest vigor in relation to initial shoot growth. However, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘Harmony’, ‘3309 Couderc’ and ‘Gravesac’ had the best balance between initial shoot growth and root development. The ‘BRS Magna’ when grafted on rootstocks ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘SO4’ and ‘101-14 MGT’ showed the highest initial development rates, while when grafted on ‘R99’, ‘R110’ and ‘420A’, it showed the lowest initial development. |
id |
UFSM-2_ae0d7fc4ca67814f89e702da6c402597 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782021000700401 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocksVitis sp.seedling productiongrafting.ABSTRACT: Rootstocks are widely used in viticulture due to their resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Additionally, rootstocks can affect vine growth and fruit quality. This study evaluated the compatibility and initial developmental of the ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks The wedge graft technique on woody cuttings was utilized. The percentage of survival ranged from 0% (‘VR043-43’) to 98.33% (‘101-14 MGT’), and the rootstock were grouped into three distinct groups. ‘IAC 313 Tropical’ and ‘SO4’ rootstocks were those ones with the highest vigor in relation to initial shoot growth. However, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘Harmony’, ‘3309 Couderc’ and ‘Gravesac’ had the best balance between initial shoot growth and root development. The ‘BRS Magna’ when grafted on rootstocks ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘SO4’ and ‘101-14 MGT’ showed the highest initial development rates, while when grafted on ‘R99’, ‘R110’ and ‘420A’, it showed the lowest initial development.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000700401Ciência Rural v.51 n.7 2021reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20190939info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrigolo,Chaiane RenataCitadin,IdemirFeldberg,Nelson PiresScariotto,SilviaPertille,Rafael HenriqueSantos,Ester ProvensiTakeshita,Kelvin Cristhian Camposeng2021-04-08T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
title |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
spellingShingle |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks Grigolo,Chaiane Renata Vitis sp. seedling production grafting. |
title_short |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
title_full |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
title_fullStr |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
title_sort |
Compatibility and initial development of grapevines ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks |
author |
Grigolo,Chaiane Renata |
author_facet |
Grigolo,Chaiane Renata Citadin,Idemir Feldberg,Nelson Pires Scariotto,Silvia Pertille,Rafael Henrique Santos,Ester Provensi Takeshita,Kelvin Cristhian Campos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Citadin,Idemir Feldberg,Nelson Pires Scariotto,Silvia Pertille,Rafael Henrique Santos,Ester Provensi Takeshita,Kelvin Cristhian Campos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grigolo,Chaiane Renata Citadin,Idemir Feldberg,Nelson Pires Scariotto,Silvia Pertille,Rafael Henrique Santos,Ester Provensi Takeshita,Kelvin Cristhian Campos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Vitis sp. seedling production grafting. |
topic |
Vitis sp. seedling production grafting. |
description |
ABSTRACT: Rootstocks are widely used in viticulture due to their resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Additionally, rootstocks can affect vine growth and fruit quality. This study evaluated the compatibility and initial developmental of the ‘BRS Magna’ grafted on different rootstocks The wedge graft technique on woody cuttings was utilized. The percentage of survival ranged from 0% (‘VR043-43’) to 98.33% (‘101-14 MGT’), and the rootstock were grouped into three distinct groups. ‘IAC 313 Tropical’ and ‘SO4’ rootstocks were those ones with the highest vigor in relation to initial shoot growth. However, ‘IAC 572 Jales’, ‘Harmony’, ‘3309 Couderc’ and ‘Gravesac’ had the best balance between initial shoot growth and root development. The ‘BRS Magna’ when grafted on rootstocks ‘IAC 313 Tropical’, ‘SO4’ and ‘101-14 MGT’ showed the highest initial development rates, while when grafted on ‘R99’, ‘R110’ and ‘420A’, it showed the lowest initial development. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000700401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782021000700401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20190939 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.51 n.7 2021 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140556046401536 |