Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martin,Thomas Newton
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cargnelutti Filho,Alberto, Deak,Evandro Ademir, Cechin,Joanei, Burg,Giovane Matias, Grün,Eduarda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600201
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Hectolitre weight (HW) is the principal quantitative parameter used by receiving units as an indicator of the quality of wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L.). The moisture content and the equipment used can be considered important sources of variation to assess a batch, requiring correct sizing of the sample used to measure the HW. This research identified the variability between the equipment used to evaluate HW with or without correcting the grain moisture content, and to estimate the ideal number of samples for the commercial classification of wheat batches. The experiment was carried out in a randomised block design with four replications. Seven batches of wheat grain from different cultivars and/or production sites were used to measure the HW using three types of equipment (Equipment ‘A’, Equipment ‘B’ and Equipment ‘C’), with and without correcting the grain moisture content to 13%. Higher values for HW were determined with Equipment ‘A’ (77.15) compared to Equipment ‘B’ (75.08) and Equipment ‘C’ (74.69), classifying the wheat according to type. The moisture content affected the HW, but did not change the final classification of the wheat in terms of type. The ideal number of samples for HW ranged from 1 to 18 at the lowest level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1) and from 67 to 1820 samples for the highest precision (HW=mean±0.1 kg hl-1). Equipment ‘B’ requires a smaller number of samples (possibly as few as one) for the same level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1), whereas Equipment ‘A’ requires a greater number of samples for the majority of batches. Correctly classifying wheat by HW therefore depends on a larger number of samples.
id UFSM-2_cf4f0a0acd9679b13799b7a95c37ccd1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782022000600201
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample sizeTriticum aestivum L.bulk densitygrain measurementsample varianceclassification system.ABSTRACT: Hectolitre weight (HW) is the principal quantitative parameter used by receiving units as an indicator of the quality of wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L.). The moisture content and the equipment used can be considered important sources of variation to assess a batch, requiring correct sizing of the sample used to measure the HW. This research identified the variability between the equipment used to evaluate HW with or without correcting the grain moisture content, and to estimate the ideal number of samples for the commercial classification of wheat batches. The experiment was carried out in a randomised block design with four replications. Seven batches of wheat grain from different cultivars and/or production sites were used to measure the HW using three types of equipment (Equipment ‘A’, Equipment ‘B’ and Equipment ‘C’), with and without correcting the grain moisture content to 13%. Higher values for HW were determined with Equipment ‘A’ (77.15) compared to Equipment ‘B’ (75.08) and Equipment ‘C’ (74.69), classifying the wheat according to type. The moisture content affected the HW, but did not change the final classification of the wheat in terms of type. The ideal number of samples for HW ranged from 1 to 18 at the lowest level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1) and from 67 to 1820 samples for the highest precision (HW=mean±0.1 kg hl-1). Equipment ‘B’ requires a smaller number of samples (possibly as few as one) for the same level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1), whereas Equipment ‘A’ requires a greater number of samples for the majority of batches. Correctly classifying wheat by HW therefore depends on a larger number of samples.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600201Ciência Rural v.52 n.6 2022reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20200992info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartin,Thomas NewtonCargnelutti Filho,AlbertoDeak,Evandro AdemirCechin,JoaneiBurg,Giovane MatiasGrün,Eduardaeng2021-11-05T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
title Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
spellingShingle Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
Martin,Thomas Newton
Triticum aestivum L.
bulk density
grain measurement
sample variance
classification system.
title_short Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
title_full Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
title_fullStr Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
title_full_unstemmed Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
title_sort Variation in the hectolitre weight of wheat grain for equipment and sample size
author Martin,Thomas Newton
author_facet Martin,Thomas Newton
Cargnelutti Filho,Alberto
Deak,Evandro Ademir
Cechin,Joanei
Burg,Giovane Matias
Grün,Eduarda
author_role author
author2 Cargnelutti Filho,Alberto
Deak,Evandro Ademir
Cechin,Joanei
Burg,Giovane Matias
Grün,Eduarda
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martin,Thomas Newton
Cargnelutti Filho,Alberto
Deak,Evandro Ademir
Cechin,Joanei
Burg,Giovane Matias
Grün,Eduarda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Triticum aestivum L.
bulk density
grain measurement
sample variance
classification system.
topic Triticum aestivum L.
bulk density
grain measurement
sample variance
classification system.
description ABSTRACT: Hectolitre weight (HW) is the principal quantitative parameter used by receiving units as an indicator of the quality of wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L.). The moisture content and the equipment used can be considered important sources of variation to assess a batch, requiring correct sizing of the sample used to measure the HW. This research identified the variability between the equipment used to evaluate HW with or without correcting the grain moisture content, and to estimate the ideal number of samples for the commercial classification of wheat batches. The experiment was carried out in a randomised block design with four replications. Seven batches of wheat grain from different cultivars and/or production sites were used to measure the HW using three types of equipment (Equipment ‘A’, Equipment ‘B’ and Equipment ‘C’), with and without correcting the grain moisture content to 13%. Higher values for HW were determined with Equipment ‘A’ (77.15) compared to Equipment ‘B’ (75.08) and Equipment ‘C’ (74.69), classifying the wheat according to type. The moisture content affected the HW, but did not change the final classification of the wheat in terms of type. The ideal number of samples for HW ranged from 1 to 18 at the lowest level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1) and from 67 to 1820 samples for the highest precision (HW=mean±0.1 kg hl-1). Equipment ‘B’ requires a smaller number of samples (possibly as few as one) for the same level of precision (HW=mean±1 kg hl-1), whereas Equipment ‘A’ requires a greater number of samples for the majority of batches. Correctly classifying wheat by HW therefore depends on a larger number of samples.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200992
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.52 n.6 2022
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140556920913920