Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782012000300009 |
Resumo: | Inhabitants of urban and rural areas are important participants in the process of developing and implementing forest policy. Thus, it is essential to determine their demands and attitudes towards forestry issues. In this context, the demands and evaluation of forest functions are investigated in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir. The findings of the case study show that differences in terms of demands among inhabitants of rural and urban areas are related to forest fires fighting, crimes fighting, forestry-tourism integration, forestation and regeneration activities, and the enlargement of forest areas. The main differences among their assessments of forest functions are related to fire wood production, and the provision of flood and erosion control, nature protection, and recreational opportunities. The findings are important for conflict management and for local decision making. By using the findings of similar studies, the provincial organizations should harmonize their priorities with the expectations of relevant interest groups. |
id |
UFSM-2_d2cd538e40eaff280330600de412a4d8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782012000300009 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesirforestrypeople demandsforest functionscluster analysiscomparing meansInhabitants of urban and rural areas are important participants in the process of developing and implementing forest policy. Thus, it is essential to determine their demands and attitudes towards forestry issues. In this context, the demands and evaluation of forest functions are investigated in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir. The findings of the case study show that differences in terms of demands among inhabitants of rural and urban areas are related to forest fires fighting, crimes fighting, forestry-tourism integration, forestation and regeneration activities, and the enlargement of forest areas. The main differences among their assessments of forest functions are related to fire wood production, and the provision of flood and erosion control, nature protection, and recreational opportunities. The findings are important for conflict management and for local decision making. By using the findings of similar studies, the provincial organizations should harmonize their priorities with the expectations of relevant interest groups.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2012-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782012000300009Ciência Rural v.42 n.3 2012reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/S0103-84782012000300009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessErol,Seçil Yurdakuleng2012-04-24T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
title |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
spellingShingle |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir Erol,Seçil Yurdakul forestry people demands forest functions cluster analysis comparing means |
title_short |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
title_full |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
title_fullStr |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
title_sort |
Differences between urban and rural population with respect to demand on forestry aspects, in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir |
author |
Erol,Seçil Yurdakul |
author_facet |
Erol,Seçil Yurdakul |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Erol,Seçil Yurdakul |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
forestry people demands forest functions cluster analysis comparing means |
topic |
forestry people demands forest functions cluster analysis comparing means |
description |
Inhabitants of urban and rural areas are important participants in the process of developing and implementing forest policy. Thus, it is essential to determine their demands and attitudes towards forestry issues. In this context, the demands and evaluation of forest functions are investigated in a case study of the Turkish province of Bal kesir. The findings of the case study show that differences in terms of demands among inhabitants of rural and urban areas are related to forest fires fighting, crimes fighting, forestry-tourism integration, forestation and regeneration activities, and the enlargement of forest areas. The main differences among their assessments of forest functions are related to fire wood production, and the provision of flood and erosion control, nature protection, and recreational opportunities. The findings are important for conflict management and for local decision making. By using the findings of similar studies, the provincial organizations should harmonize their priorities with the expectations of relevant interest groups. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782012000300009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782012000300009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-84782012000300009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.42 n.3 2012 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140540583051264 |