Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017001000401 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Apitoxin is the venom produced by bees. It is a complex chemical compound, rich in protein substances and with pharmacological effects. This study was carried out with the objective of comparing the quality of apitoxin extracted in an apiary in different parts of the collector in relation to moisture content, protein analysis and cytotoxicity assay with Artemia salina L. Type 1 apitoxin was collected from glass slabs at the entrance to the hive, while type 2 apitoxin was collected from the waste accumulated in the collection rods and treated by rinsing in distilled water. Both apitoxins presented significant differences (P>0.05) in relation to protein profile, with type 1 showing a higher content (77.8%) than type 2 (51.9%), and presented polypeptide bands with more than 50% of their nitrogenous components having molecular weight below 10KDa. Regarding cytotoxicity assays, type 1 apitoxin had LD50 of 71.5μg mL-1, while type 2 had LD50 of 191.6μg mL-1. Thus, the region where apitoxin accumulates in the collector does influence the product quality if moisture and protein contents are in accordance with the standards recommended in specific legislation, and so it can be commercialized by the beekeeper. |
id |
UFSM-2_d5a26c50b2e176ee2174e7ee73cf53fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782017001000401 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicitybeesbeekeepingbee venomArtemia salina LABSTRACT: Apitoxin is the venom produced by bees. It is a complex chemical compound, rich in protein substances and with pharmacological effects. This study was carried out with the objective of comparing the quality of apitoxin extracted in an apiary in different parts of the collector in relation to moisture content, protein analysis and cytotoxicity assay with Artemia salina L. Type 1 apitoxin was collected from glass slabs at the entrance to the hive, while type 2 apitoxin was collected from the waste accumulated in the collection rods and treated by rinsing in distilled water. Both apitoxins presented significant differences (P>0.05) in relation to protein profile, with type 1 showing a higher content (77.8%) than type 2 (51.9%), and presented polypeptide bands with more than 50% of their nitrogenous components having molecular weight below 10KDa. Regarding cytotoxicity assays, type 1 apitoxin had LD50 of 71.5μg mL-1, while type 2 had LD50 of 191.6μg mL-1. Thus, the region where apitoxin accumulates in the collector does influence the product quality if moisture and protein contents are in accordance with the standards recommended in specific legislation, and so it can be commercialized by the beekeeper.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017001000401Ciência Rural v.47 n.10 2017reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20160486info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbrantes,Allyson FortunatoRocha,Thayse Cavalcante daLima,Amanda Beatriz Sales deCavalcanti,Mônica Tejoeng2017-08-31T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
title |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
spellingShingle |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity Abrantes,Allyson Fortunato bees beekeeping bee venom Artemia salina L |
title_short |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
title_full |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
title_fullStr |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
title_sort |
Honeybee venom: influence of collection on quality and cytotoxicity |
author |
Abrantes,Allyson Fortunato |
author_facet |
Abrantes,Allyson Fortunato Rocha,Thayse Cavalcante da Lima,Amanda Beatriz Sales de Cavalcanti,Mônica Tejo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha,Thayse Cavalcante da Lima,Amanda Beatriz Sales de Cavalcanti,Mônica Tejo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abrantes,Allyson Fortunato Rocha,Thayse Cavalcante da Lima,Amanda Beatriz Sales de Cavalcanti,Mônica Tejo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bees beekeeping bee venom Artemia salina L |
topic |
bees beekeeping bee venom Artemia salina L |
description |
ABSTRACT: Apitoxin is the venom produced by bees. It is a complex chemical compound, rich in protein substances and with pharmacological effects. This study was carried out with the objective of comparing the quality of apitoxin extracted in an apiary in different parts of the collector in relation to moisture content, protein analysis and cytotoxicity assay with Artemia salina L. Type 1 apitoxin was collected from glass slabs at the entrance to the hive, while type 2 apitoxin was collected from the waste accumulated in the collection rods and treated by rinsing in distilled water. Both apitoxins presented significant differences (P>0.05) in relation to protein profile, with type 1 showing a higher content (77.8%) than type 2 (51.9%), and presented polypeptide bands with more than 50% of their nitrogenous components having molecular weight below 10KDa. Regarding cytotoxicity assays, type 1 apitoxin had LD50 of 71.5μg mL-1, while type 2 had LD50 of 191.6μg mL-1. Thus, the region where apitoxin accumulates in the collector does influence the product quality if moisture and protein contents are in accordance with the standards recommended in specific legislation, and so it can be commercialized by the beekeeper. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017001000401 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017001000401 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20160486 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.47 n.10 2017 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140551744094208 |