Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017000300452 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Pseudorabies (PR) is a highly contagious viral disease of great animal health and economic importance in swine industry. The aim of this study was to evaluate different genomic regions, real-time PCR chemistries and equipment for the molecular diagnosis of PR. Eight primer pairs targeting four genes (gB, gC, gE, gD), three different qPCR chemistries (SybrGreen, hydrolysis probes and plexor) and two equipment (ABI7500, Rotorgene 3000) were evaluated. Oligonucleotides targeting gB using hydrolysis probes showed the best performance after evaluating efficiency (99%), the detection limit (10-1.5 TCID50 mL-1) and diagnostic sensitivity and; therefore, those primers were selected for performance verification factors such as repeatability, reproducibility and robustness (1.39% variance between days, 24% variance between analysts and 4.07% variance in analysis error). The qPCR standardized and validated in this research proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of PR and may be used in diagnostic laboratories that follow ISO 17025 and ISO 16140. |
id |
UFSM-2_e5ef087cdc3793a2b0a12de8b9230fe3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782017000300452 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virusreal time PCRpseudorabiesdiagnoseABSTRACT: Pseudorabies (PR) is a highly contagious viral disease of great animal health and economic importance in swine industry. The aim of this study was to evaluate different genomic regions, real-time PCR chemistries and equipment for the molecular diagnosis of PR. Eight primer pairs targeting four genes (gB, gC, gE, gD), three different qPCR chemistries (SybrGreen, hydrolysis probes and plexor) and two equipment (ABI7500, Rotorgene 3000) were evaluated. Oligonucleotides targeting gB using hydrolysis probes showed the best performance after evaluating efficiency (99%), the detection limit (10-1.5 TCID50 mL-1) and diagnostic sensitivity and; therefore, those primers were selected for performance verification factors such as repeatability, reproducibility and robustness (1.39% variance between days, 24% variance between analysts and 4.07% variance in analysis error). The qPCR standardized and validated in this research proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of PR and may be used in diagnostic laboratories that follow ISO 17025 and ISO 16140.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017000300452Ciência Rural v.47 n.3 2017reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20160342info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNonaka,Carolina Kymie VasquesFonseca Junior,Antônio AugustoGuedes,Estefânia OliveiraD´Ambros,Régia MariaLima,Graciela KunrathCamargos,Marcelo FernandesHeinemann,Marcos Bryaneng2017-01-09T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
title |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
spellingShingle |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus Nonaka,Carolina Kymie Vasques real time PCR pseudorabies diagnose |
title_short |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
title_full |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
title_fullStr |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
title_sort |
Different methods of real-time PCR for detection of pseudorabies virus |
author |
Nonaka,Carolina Kymie Vasques |
author_facet |
Nonaka,Carolina Kymie Vasques Fonseca Junior,Antônio Augusto Guedes,Estefânia Oliveira D´Ambros,Régia Maria Lima,Graciela Kunrath Camargos,Marcelo Fernandes Heinemann,Marcos Bryan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fonseca Junior,Antônio Augusto Guedes,Estefânia Oliveira D´Ambros,Régia Maria Lima,Graciela Kunrath Camargos,Marcelo Fernandes Heinemann,Marcos Bryan |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nonaka,Carolina Kymie Vasques Fonseca Junior,Antônio Augusto Guedes,Estefânia Oliveira D´Ambros,Régia Maria Lima,Graciela Kunrath Camargos,Marcelo Fernandes Heinemann,Marcos Bryan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
real time PCR pseudorabies diagnose |
topic |
real time PCR pseudorabies diagnose |
description |
ABSTRACT: Pseudorabies (PR) is a highly contagious viral disease of great animal health and economic importance in swine industry. The aim of this study was to evaluate different genomic regions, real-time PCR chemistries and equipment for the molecular diagnosis of PR. Eight primer pairs targeting four genes (gB, gC, gE, gD), three different qPCR chemistries (SybrGreen, hydrolysis probes and plexor) and two equipment (ABI7500, Rotorgene 3000) were evaluated. Oligonucleotides targeting gB using hydrolysis probes showed the best performance after evaluating efficiency (99%), the detection limit (10-1.5 TCID50 mL-1) and diagnostic sensitivity and; therefore, those primers were selected for performance verification factors such as repeatability, reproducibility and robustness (1.39% variance between days, 24% variance between analysts and 4.07% variance in analysis error). The qPCR standardized and validated in this research proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of PR and may be used in diagnostic laboratories that follow ISO 17025 and ISO 16140. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017000300452 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782017000300452 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20160342 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.47 n.3 2017 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140551215611904 |