Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000801492 |
Resumo: | Adequate methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs are important for the understanding of nutrient utilization. Therefore, this study evaluated two methods of feces collection: intestinal dissection and fecal decantation, using cylindric-conical tanks. Frogs were fed with a commercial diet (45% crude protein) which was ground and supplemented with 0.5% chromium oxide III. The frogs were fasted 48h before force-feeding (5% of the animal's live weight). For the decantation method, the animals were sacrificed 36 h after force-feeding and feces were collected directly from the large intestine. For the sedimentation method, feces were collected when they appeared in the tubes attached to the front end of the cylindric tanks. No significant difference (P>0.05) in the apparent digestibility coefficients of crude protein for dietary was observed between the methods tested (74.0% and 76.4% for the dissection and decantation methods, respectively). In conclusion, both methods can be used for the determination of protein digestibility of bullfrog feeds |
id |
UFSM-2_f14e11cab3c7380579ff565fb8bc7463 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782015000801492 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogsprotein digestibility coefficientmethodologynutritionfrog farmingAdequate methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs are important for the understanding of nutrient utilization. Therefore, this study evaluated two methods of feces collection: intestinal dissection and fecal decantation, using cylindric-conical tanks. Frogs were fed with a commercial diet (45% crude protein) which was ground and supplemented with 0.5% chromium oxide III. The frogs were fasted 48h before force-feeding (5% of the animal's live weight). For the decantation method, the animals were sacrificed 36 h after force-feeding and feces were collected directly from the large intestine. For the sedimentation method, feces were collected when they appeared in the tubes attached to the front end of the cylindric tanks. No significant difference (P>0.05) in the apparent digestibility coefficients of crude protein for dietary was observed between the methods tested (74.0% and 76.4% for the dissection and decantation methods, respectively). In conclusion, both methods can be used for the determination of protein digestibility of bullfrog feedsUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000801492Ciência Rural v.45 n.8 2015reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20141369info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStéfani,Marta Verardino DePereira,Marcelo MaiaReche,Marcio RobertoMansano,Cleber Fernando Menegassoeng2015-08-31T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
title |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
spellingShingle |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs Stéfani,Marta Verardino De protein digestibility coefficient methodology nutrition frog farming |
title_short |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
title_full |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
title_fullStr |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
title_sort |
Fecal collection methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs |
author |
Stéfani,Marta Verardino De |
author_facet |
Stéfani,Marta Verardino De Pereira,Marcelo Maia Reche,Marcio Roberto Mansano,Cleber Fernando Menegasso |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira,Marcelo Maia Reche,Marcio Roberto Mansano,Cleber Fernando Menegasso |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stéfani,Marta Verardino De Pereira,Marcelo Maia Reche,Marcio Roberto Mansano,Cleber Fernando Menegasso |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
protein digestibility coefficient methodology nutrition frog farming |
topic |
protein digestibility coefficient methodology nutrition frog farming |
description |
Adequate methods for the determination of protein digestibility in bullfrogs are important for the understanding of nutrient utilization. Therefore, this study evaluated two methods of feces collection: intestinal dissection and fecal decantation, using cylindric-conical tanks. Frogs were fed with a commercial diet (45% crude protein) which was ground and supplemented with 0.5% chromium oxide III. The frogs were fasted 48h before force-feeding (5% of the animal's live weight). For the decantation method, the animals were sacrificed 36 h after force-feeding and feces were collected directly from the large intestine. For the sedimentation method, feces were collected when they appeared in the tubes attached to the front end of the cylindric tanks. No significant difference (P>0.05) in the apparent digestibility coefficients of crude protein for dietary was observed between the methods tested (74.0% and 76.4% for the dissection and decantation methods, respectively). In conclusion, both methods can be used for the determination of protein digestibility of bullfrog feeds |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000801492 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782015000801492 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20141369 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.45 n.8 2015 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140547342172160 |