Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600402 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: The fungi Macrophomina phaseolina is the charcoal rot causal agent, one of the most important cowpea crop disease in semiarid regions can causes 100% yield losses. The search for resistant genotypes requires efficient phenotyping. In addition, there is the problem of great variation in aggressiveness between isolates. This study aimed to 1) test three methods of inoculation in semiarid conditions, and 2) to evaluate the aggressiveness of isolates of M. phaseolina. In the first experiment carried out in greenhouse, the inoculations methods were evaluated, using two cowpea lines, three inoculation methods and three pathogen isolates. On the second experiment, fifteen M. phaseolina isolates were inoculated in one cultivar to evaluate their aggressiveness. By assessing the length of the lesions and the severity of the disease using an index, we identified the toothpick inoculation method as the most efficient. Toothpick method allowed to discriminate the genotypes and the aggressiveness of the pathogen. |
id |
UFSM-2_fc61b6c9bef62bd533adaabb0965ce2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782022000600402 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpeacharcoal rottoothpick methodphenotypingVigna unguiculata (L) WalpsemiaridABSTRACT: The fungi Macrophomina phaseolina is the charcoal rot causal agent, one of the most important cowpea crop disease in semiarid regions can causes 100% yield losses. The search for resistant genotypes requires efficient phenotyping. In addition, there is the problem of great variation in aggressiveness between isolates. This study aimed to 1) test three methods of inoculation in semiarid conditions, and 2) to evaluate the aggressiveness of isolates of M. phaseolina. In the first experiment carried out in greenhouse, the inoculations methods were evaluated, using two cowpea lines, three inoculation methods and three pathogen isolates. On the second experiment, fifteen M. phaseolina isolates were inoculated in one cultivar to evaluate their aggressiveness. By assessing the length of the lesions and the severity of the disease using an index, we identified the toothpick inoculation method as the most efficient. Toothpick method allowed to discriminate the genotypes and the aggressiveness of the pathogen.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600402Ciência Rural v.52 n.6 2022reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20210072info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,Erik Micael da SilvaSilva,Leonardo Aparecido Brandão daPinto,Francisco Álef CarlosBorel,Jerônimo ConstantinoCapucho,Alexandre SandriIshikawa,Francine Hiromieng2021-11-18T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
title |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
spellingShingle |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea Souza,Erik Micael da Silva charcoal rot toothpick method phenotyping Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp semiarid |
title_short |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
title_full |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
title_fullStr |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
title_sort |
Inoculation methods and agressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates in cowpea |
author |
Souza,Erik Micael da Silva |
author_facet |
Souza,Erik Micael da Silva Silva,Leonardo Aparecido Brandão da Pinto,Francisco Álef Carlos Borel,Jerônimo Constantino Capucho,Alexandre Sandri Ishikawa,Francine Hiromi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Leonardo Aparecido Brandão da Pinto,Francisco Álef Carlos Borel,Jerônimo Constantino Capucho,Alexandre Sandri Ishikawa,Francine Hiromi |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza,Erik Micael da Silva Silva,Leonardo Aparecido Brandão da Pinto,Francisco Álef Carlos Borel,Jerônimo Constantino Capucho,Alexandre Sandri Ishikawa,Francine Hiromi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
charcoal rot toothpick method phenotyping Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp semiarid |
topic |
charcoal rot toothpick method phenotyping Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp semiarid |
description |
ABSTRACT: The fungi Macrophomina phaseolina is the charcoal rot causal agent, one of the most important cowpea crop disease in semiarid regions can causes 100% yield losses. The search for resistant genotypes requires efficient phenotyping. In addition, there is the problem of great variation in aggressiveness between isolates. This study aimed to 1) test three methods of inoculation in semiarid conditions, and 2) to evaluate the aggressiveness of isolates of M. phaseolina. In the first experiment carried out in greenhouse, the inoculations methods were evaluated, using two cowpea lines, three inoculation methods and three pathogen isolates. On the second experiment, fifteen M. phaseolina isolates were inoculated in one cultivar to evaluate their aggressiveness. By assessing the length of the lesions and the severity of the disease using an index, we identified the toothpick inoculation method as the most efficient. Toothpick method allowed to discriminate the genotypes and the aggressiveness of the pathogen. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600402 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782022000600402 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20210072 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.52 n.6 2022 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140556928253952 |