O programa de monitoramento da biodiversidade e do uso sustentável de recursos naturais –ProBUC – como alternativa de monitoramento comunitário amazônico

• Autor(a) principal: Costa, Daniel Carneiro
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Marchand, Guillaume Antoine
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista Monografias Ambientais
• Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/13498
• topic: Monitoramento comunitário; ProBUC; Gestão de unidades de conservação; Populações locais

The ProBUC - monitoring program of biodiversity and the sustainable use of natural resources - is presented in this paper as a methodological innovation in the process of community monitoring in the state of Amazonas. Its appearance is intended to subsidize the management of Amazonian state conservation units. This requirement results in a larger process of improving the management of protected across the globe, from a review to consider the reality of each biome and appreciation of their specific areas. In this context, increased in recent years , the experiences of community monitoring, especially in tropical countries, where conventional monitoring is typically more expensive and does not have adequate budgetary and technical support from national governments. Thus, this alternative form of community monitoring aims incorporates the participation of local communities in all stages of implementation, the prioritization of species and resources to monitor the interpretation of the results with the aim of promoting a diagnosis that can contribute to the management of the protected area. It is intended to meet the scope and methodology of ProBUC to know if it really corresponds to a community monitoring program. It is used in theoretical research and direct observations in this article. Controversies and complementary aspects between conventional methods of monitoring and community are exposed by international authors to get exposure to the proposal of Amazonas state program. Furthermore, the main findings of two evaluation events on this program are presented, which show that many adjustments for proper functioning of the program are still required. Finally, it appears that their deployment in 3 conservation units need a review to know its sustainability and local community involvement.