Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Renata Xavier Alberico
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Melo, Geraldo Aclécio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Monografias Ambientais
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/7992
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the use of biocompound based on sewage sludge in the production of seedlings, which was selected in the tomato Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Santa Adélia) for execution of the experiments. Initially, it was performed a chemical analysis of biocompound and mixtures, as well as the substratum and soil combined with commonly used organic substrate (manure tanned). The design was a completely random; with five treatments and four replications. There were used as treatments: 1 - Mixture of soil + cattle manure (3:1), 2 - soil + compost mixture (3:1), 3 - mixture soil + compost (ratio 2:2); 4 - pure compound, 5 - Plantimax ® pure commercial substrate. Morphological evaluations were made: plant height, stem diameter, leaf number, and shoot dry mass at 15, 30 and 45 days after planting. With the used doses was not possible to estimate the proper amount of biocompound for maximum development of seedlings, but the use of biocompound favored the growth of plants. Treatment 5 gave the lowest development among the treatments. Treatment with 100% biocompound provided the best average of the morphological attributes evaluated, and larger doses of the compound: treatments 2 - Soil + compost (3:1), 3 - Soil + compost (ratio 2:2) to treatment 4 - compound (ratio 0: 4), provided an increase in quality of plant development. The results were statistically significant and different from each other regarding the number of leaves, diameter, height and dry weight.
id UFSM-3_aac6da71dc989a388e6628b45dd48a12
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7992
network_acronym_str UFSM-3
network_name_str Revista Monografias Ambientais
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010Avaliação do uso de biocomposto de lodo de esgoto como substrato para produção de mudasSewage sludgeCompostingBio-fertilizerLodo de esgotoCompostagemBiofertilizanteThis study aimed to evaluate the use of biocompound based on sewage sludge in the production of seedlings, which was selected in the tomato Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Santa Adélia) for execution of the experiments. Initially, it was performed a chemical analysis of biocompound and mixtures, as well as the substratum and soil combined with commonly used organic substrate (manure tanned). The design was a completely random; with five treatments and four replications. There were used as treatments: 1 - Mixture of soil + cattle manure (3:1), 2 - soil + compost mixture (3:1), 3 - mixture soil + compost (ratio 2:2); 4 - pure compound, 5 - Plantimax ® pure commercial substrate. Morphological evaluations were made: plant height, stem diameter, leaf number, and shoot dry mass at 15, 30 and 45 days after planting. With the used doses was not possible to estimate the proper amount of biocompound for maximum development of seedlings, but the use of biocompound favored the growth of plants. Treatment 5 gave the lowest development among the treatments. Treatment with 100% biocompound provided the best average of the morphological attributes evaluated, and larger doses of the compound: treatments 2 - Soil + compost (3:1), 3 - Soil + compost (ratio 2:2) to treatment 4 - compound (ratio 0: 4), provided an increase in quality of plant development. The results were statistically significant and different from each other regarding the number of leaves, diameter, height and dry weight.O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o uso de biocomposto à base de lodo de esgoto na produção de mudas, em que foi selecionado o tomateiro Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Santa Adélia) para execução dos experimentos. Inicialmente foi realizada análise química do biocomposto e misturas, assim como do substrato comercial e do solo combinado com substrato orgânico comumente utilizado (esterco curtido). O delineamento utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado, com cinco tratamentos e quatro repetições. Utilizou-se como tratamentos: 1 – Mistura de solo + Esterco bovino curtido (proporção 3:1); 2 – Mistura de solo + composto (proporção 3:1); 3 –Mistura de solo + composto (proporção 2:2); 4 - composto puro; 5 – substrato comercial Plantimax® puro. Foram feitas avaliações morfológicas: altura da planta; diâmetro do caule; número de folhas; massa seca da parte aérea aos 15, 30 e 45 dias após o plantio. Com as doses utilizadas não foi possível estimar a quantidade adequada de biocomposto para o máximo desenvolvimento das mudas, mas o uso do biocomposto favoreceu o crescimento das plantas. O tratamento 5 proporcionou o menor desenvolvimento dentre os tratamentos. O tratamento com 100% de biocomposto proporcionou a melhor média dos atributos morfológicos avaliados, e o aumento da dose do composto, tratamentos 2 – Solo + composto (proporção 3:1); 3 – Solo + composto (proporção 2:2) até o tratamento 4 - composto (proporção 0: 4),  proporcionou um aumento  na qualidade de desenvolvimento das mudas. Os resultados foram significativos e estatisticamente diferentes entre si, quanto ao número de folhas, diâmetro, altura e massa seca.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2013-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/799210.5902/223613087992Monografias Ambientais; REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013; 2665 - 2673Revista Monografias Ambientais; REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013; 2665 - 26732236-13082236-1308reponame:Revista Monografias Ambientaisinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttp://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/7992/pdfCopyright (c) 2013 Revista Monografias Ambientaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Renata Xavier AlbericoMelo, Geraldo Aclécio2021-05-28T16:41:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7992Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoaONGhttp://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/remoa/oai||remoa.ufsm@gmail.com2236-13082236-1308opendoar:2021-05-28T16:41:32Revista Monografias Ambientais - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
Avaliação do uso de biocomposto de lodo de esgoto como substrato para produção de mudas
title Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
spellingShingle Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
Freitas, Renata Xavier Alberico
Sewage sludge
Composting
Bio-fertilizer
Lodo de esgoto
Compostagem
Biofertilizante
title_short Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
title_full Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
title_fullStr Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
title_sort Evaluation of the use of biocompound of sewage sludge as substrate for seedlings production, 2010
author Freitas, Renata Xavier Alberico
author_facet Freitas, Renata Xavier Alberico
Melo, Geraldo Aclécio
author_role author
author2 Melo, Geraldo Aclécio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Renata Xavier Alberico
Melo, Geraldo Aclécio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sewage sludge
Composting
Bio-fertilizer
Lodo de esgoto
Compostagem
Biofertilizante
topic Sewage sludge
Composting
Bio-fertilizer
Lodo de esgoto
Compostagem
Biofertilizante
description This study aimed to evaluate the use of biocompound based on sewage sludge in the production of seedlings, which was selected in the tomato Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Santa Adélia) for execution of the experiments. Initially, it was performed a chemical analysis of biocompound and mixtures, as well as the substratum and soil combined with commonly used organic substrate (manure tanned). The design was a completely random; with five treatments and four replications. There were used as treatments: 1 - Mixture of soil + cattle manure (3:1), 2 - soil + compost mixture (3:1), 3 - mixture soil + compost (ratio 2:2); 4 - pure compound, 5 - Plantimax ® pure commercial substrate. Morphological evaluations were made: plant height, stem diameter, leaf number, and shoot dry mass at 15, 30 and 45 days after planting. With the used doses was not possible to estimate the proper amount of biocompound for maximum development of seedlings, but the use of biocompound favored the growth of plants. Treatment 5 gave the lowest development among the treatments. Treatment with 100% biocompound provided the best average of the morphological attributes evaluated, and larger doses of the compound: treatments 2 - Soil + compost (3:1), 3 - Soil + compost (ratio 2:2) to treatment 4 - compound (ratio 0: 4), provided an increase in quality of plant development. The results were statistically significant and different from each other regarding the number of leaves, diameter, height and dry weight.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/7992
10.5902/223613087992
url http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/7992
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/223613087992
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufsm.br/remoa/article/view/7992/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Revista Monografias Ambientais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Revista Monografias Ambientais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Monografias Ambientais; REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013; 2665 - 2673
Revista Monografias Ambientais; REMOA, V. 12, N. 12, MAIO-AGO., 2013; 2665 - 2673
2236-1308
2236-1308
reponame:Revista Monografias Ambientais
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Revista Monografias Ambientais
collection Revista Monografias Ambientais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Monografias Ambientais - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||remoa.ufsm@gmail.com
_version_ 1799950552969248768