Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Keffer, Josiane Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Souza, Adilson Pacheco de, Santos, Rogério Antônio dos, Lima, Daiane Cristina de, Pizzatto, Mariana, Silva, Andréa Carvalho da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of fire retardants and water-retaining polymer on seed germination of tropical forest species Handroanthu simpetiginosus (ipê-rosa), Tabebuia roseoalba (ipê-branco), Enterolobium schomburgkii (faveira) and Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (paricá). It is noteworthy that no comparisons were made between the products, as they have different commercial recommendations and chemical compositions. The seeds were submitted to solutions of three fire retardants in the following concentrations: i) Phos-Chek WD881® at 0.0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.8 and 1.0 mL L-1; ii) Hold Fire® at 0.0; 0.7; 0.9; 1.1; 1.3 and 1.5 mL L-1; and iii) water-retaining polymer Nutrigel® at 0.0; 0.10; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75 and 1.0 g L-1. Four replicates of 100, 100, 30 and 25 seeds were evaluated for the aforementioned species, in a completely randomized design. The germination tests were conducted in germination chambers at 30°C and 12 hours of photoperiod for 14 days. It was evaluated: germination percentage, first germination count, germination speed index, average germination time and seedling vigor were evaluated. Phos-Chek WD881 reduced the germination speed of the ipês and the first germination count and number of normal seedlings of these species and paricá. Hold Fire influenced the germination percentage of ipê-rosa (maximum 97.0% in 1.1 mL L-1) and the germination speed of ipê-branco, but did not cause variations in seedlings vigor. The water-retaining polymer did not influence germination, but caused a 14.3% reduction of normal seedlings to paricá. In general, Phos-Chek WD881 can be phytotoxic to ipê-branco, ipê-rosa and paricá, when applied in concentrations ≥ 0.6 mL L-1; Hold Fire can promote the germination of ipê-branco and ipê-rosa, without effects for the other species; and the water-retainng polymer had no effect on the seed germination of the evaluated forest species.
id UFSM-6_011b0b206a9c9f514ef79c8c9e46ef79
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37161
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest speciesEfeito de retardantes de fogo sobre a germinação de espécies florestais tropicaisForest seedsGermination processPhytotoxicityFire retardantsSementes florestaisProcesso germinativoFitotoxidadeRetardantes de fogoThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of fire retardants and water-retaining polymer on seed germination of tropical forest species Handroanthu simpetiginosus (ipê-rosa), Tabebuia roseoalba (ipê-branco), Enterolobium schomburgkii (faveira) and Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (paricá). It is noteworthy that no comparisons were made between the products, as they have different commercial recommendations and chemical compositions. The seeds were submitted to solutions of three fire retardants in the following concentrations: i) Phos-Chek WD881® at 0.0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.8 and 1.0 mL L-1; ii) Hold Fire® at 0.0; 0.7; 0.9; 1.1; 1.3 and 1.5 mL L-1; and iii) water-retaining polymer Nutrigel® at 0.0; 0.10; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75 and 1.0 g L-1. Four replicates of 100, 100, 30 and 25 seeds were evaluated for the aforementioned species, in a completely randomized design. The germination tests were conducted in germination chambers at 30°C and 12 hours of photoperiod for 14 days. It was evaluated: germination percentage, first germination count, germination speed index, average germination time and seedling vigor were evaluated. Phos-Chek WD881 reduced the germination speed of the ipês and the first germination count and number of normal seedlings of these species and paricá. Hold Fire influenced the germination percentage of ipê-rosa (maximum 97.0% in 1.1 mL L-1) and the germination speed of ipê-branco, but did not cause variations in seedlings vigor. The water-retaining polymer did not influence germination, but caused a 14.3% reduction of normal seedlings to paricá. In general, Phos-Chek WD881 can be phytotoxic to ipê-branco, ipê-rosa and paricá, when applied in concentrations ≥ 0.6 mL L-1; Hold Fire can promote the germination of ipê-branco and ipê-rosa, without effects for the other species; and the water-retainng polymer had no effect on the seed germination of the evaluated forest species.Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito de diferentes concentrações de retardantes de fogo e de um polímero hidrorretentor sobre a germinação de sementes das espécies florestais tropicais Handroanthu simpetiginosus (ipê-rosa), Tabebuia roseoalba (ipê-branco), Enterolobium schomburgkii (faveira) e Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (paricá). Destaca-se que não foram realizadas comparações entre os produtos, pois estes apresentam diferentes recomendações comerciais e composições químicas. As sementes foram submetidas a soluções de três retardantes de fogo nas seguintes concentrações: i) Phos-Chek WD881® a 0,0; 0,1; 0,3; 0,6; 0,8 e 1,0 mL L-1; ii) Hold Fire® a 0,0; 0,7; 0,9; 1,1; 1,3 e 1,5 mL L-1; e iii) polímero hidrorretentor Nutrigel® a 0,00; 0,10; 0,25; 0,50; 0,75 e 1,0 g L-1. Foram avaliadas quatro repetições de 100, 100, 30 e 25 sementes para as espécies supracitadas, em delineamento inteiramente casualizado. Os testes de germinação foram conduzidos em câmaras de germinação a 30°C e fotoperíodo de 12 h, por 14 dias. Avaliaram-se: porcentagem de germinação, primeira contagem de germinação, índice de velocidade de germinação, tempo médio de germinação e vigor de plântulas. O Phos-Chek WD881 reduziu a velocidade de germinação dos ipês e a primeira contagem de germinação e quantidade de plântulas normais dessas espécies e do paricá. O Hold Fire influenciou na porcentagem de germinação do ipê-rosa (máximo de 97,0% em 1,1 mL L-1) e na velocidade de germinação do ipê-branco, mas não causou variações no vigor das plântulas. O polímero hidrorretentor não influenciou na germinação, mas causou redução de 14,3% de plântulas normais para o paricá. Em geral, Phos-Chek WD881 pode ser fitotóxico para o ipê-branco, ipê-rosa e paricá, quando aplicado em concentrações ≥ 0,6 mL L-1; Hold Fire pode promover a germinação do ipê-branco e do ipê-rosa, sem efeitos para as demais espécies; e o polímero hidrorretentor não exerceu nenhum efeito sobre a germinação de sementes das espécies florestais avaliadas.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3716110.5902/1980509837161Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 725-748Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 725-7481980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161/htmlCopyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKeffer, Josiane FernandesSouza, Adilson Pacheco deSantos, Rogério Antônio dosLima, Daiane Cristina dePizzatto, MarianaSilva, Andréa Carvalho da2021-08-24T13:31:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37161Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2021-08-24T13:31:11Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
Efeito de retardantes de fogo sobre a germinação de espécies florestais tropicais
title Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
spellingShingle Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
Keffer, Josiane Fernandes
Forest seeds
Germination process
Phytotoxicity
Fire retardants
Sementes florestais
Processo germinativo
Fitotoxidade
Retardantes de fogo
title_short Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
title_full Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
title_fullStr Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
title_full_unstemmed Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
title_sort Effect of fire retardants on the germination of tropical forest species
author Keffer, Josiane Fernandes
author_facet Keffer, Josiane Fernandes
Souza, Adilson Pacheco de
Santos, Rogério Antônio dos
Lima, Daiane Cristina de
Pizzatto, Mariana
Silva, Andréa Carvalho da
author_role author
author2 Souza, Adilson Pacheco de
Santos, Rogério Antônio dos
Lima, Daiane Cristina de
Pizzatto, Mariana
Silva, Andréa Carvalho da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Keffer, Josiane Fernandes
Souza, Adilson Pacheco de
Santos, Rogério Antônio dos
Lima, Daiane Cristina de
Pizzatto, Mariana
Silva, Andréa Carvalho da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forest seeds
Germination process
Phytotoxicity
Fire retardants
Sementes florestais
Processo germinativo
Fitotoxidade
Retardantes de fogo
topic Forest seeds
Germination process
Phytotoxicity
Fire retardants
Sementes florestais
Processo germinativo
Fitotoxidade
Retardantes de fogo
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of fire retardants and water-retaining polymer on seed germination of tropical forest species Handroanthu simpetiginosus (ipê-rosa), Tabebuia roseoalba (ipê-branco), Enterolobium schomburgkii (faveira) and Schizolobium parahyba var. amazonicum (paricá). It is noteworthy that no comparisons were made between the products, as they have different commercial recommendations and chemical compositions. The seeds were submitted to solutions of three fire retardants in the following concentrations: i) Phos-Chek WD881® at 0.0; 0.1; 0.3; 0.6; 0.8 and 1.0 mL L-1; ii) Hold Fire® at 0.0; 0.7; 0.9; 1.1; 1.3 and 1.5 mL L-1; and iii) water-retaining polymer Nutrigel® at 0.0; 0.10; 0.25; 0.50; 0.75 and 1.0 g L-1. Four replicates of 100, 100, 30 and 25 seeds were evaluated for the aforementioned species, in a completely randomized design. The germination tests were conducted in germination chambers at 30°C and 12 hours of photoperiod for 14 days. It was evaluated: germination percentage, first germination count, germination speed index, average germination time and seedling vigor were evaluated. Phos-Chek WD881 reduced the germination speed of the ipês and the first germination count and number of normal seedlings of these species and paricá. Hold Fire influenced the germination percentage of ipê-rosa (maximum 97.0% in 1.1 mL L-1) and the germination speed of ipê-branco, but did not cause variations in seedlings vigor. The water-retaining polymer did not influence germination, but caused a 14.3% reduction of normal seedlings to paricá. In general, Phos-Chek WD881 can be phytotoxic to ipê-branco, ipê-rosa and paricá, when applied in concentrations ≥ 0.6 mL L-1; Hold Fire can promote the germination of ipê-branco and ipê-rosa, without effects for the other species; and the water-retainng polymer had no effect on the seed germination of the evaluated forest species.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161
10.5902/1980509837161
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509837161
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161/pdf
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/37161/html
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021); 725-748
Ciência Florestal; v. 31 n. 2 (2021); 725-748
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944134694273024