BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1857 |
Resumo: | Wood has always been structurally used in solid form in civil construction, with a low degree of processing and technological innovation, and many times in other constituents such as floors, walls and roofs. However, changes in the adopted standards involve the refinement of technology, as well as, changes of the esthetic and functional concepts required in constructions. Thus, structural wood beams, such as glulam and I – joist, have emerged, presenting a series of advantages such as high resistance in relation to weight. The general objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the type of adhesive on the strength and stiffness of beams of Glulam and I-joist of Pinus taeda. The adhesives used in the experiment were resorcinol-phenolformaldehyde (RFF), melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) and polyurethane (PUR). The process of manufacturing the beams involved the classification of the parts, manufacturing of the finger joint, junction, assembly and pressing. The assays involved the assessment of structural properties of bending such as the Elasticity Model and Rupture. In the analysis of the average values for the variables, no significant differences were found for the glulam, however, for the I - joist, the superiority of the PUR adhesive was verified, based on the average value of the rupture model. In relation to the types and weights of the adhesives used, it was observed that the RFF adhesive needed a greater amount of the product to provide the mechanism of adherence, 500 g/m2. Two parameters made the PUR adhesive different in relation to the others: a 24 times faster healing time, making it more advantageous from the point of view of volume of production; and the shorter open time, which requires special procedures. The glulam beams showed higher mean values, but the choice of the beam model must be analyzed carefully, always taking into consideration the required resistance and the cost of the material to be used in the confection. |
id |
UFSM-6_26509fcf2e28cfb9f1ca4722bc851c5c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1857 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVESRigidez e resistência de vigas estruturais de madeira laminada colada e com perfil I compostas por diferentes adesivos.glulamI – joistpotential adhesives for beams.madeira laminada coladaviga com perfil em Iadesivos potenciais para vigasWood has always been structurally used in solid form in civil construction, with a low degree of processing and technological innovation, and many times in other constituents such as floors, walls and roofs. However, changes in the adopted standards involve the refinement of technology, as well as, changes of the esthetic and functional concepts required in constructions. Thus, structural wood beams, such as glulam and I – joist, have emerged, presenting a series of advantages such as high resistance in relation to weight. The general objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the type of adhesive on the strength and stiffness of beams of Glulam and I-joist of Pinus taeda. The adhesives used in the experiment were resorcinol-phenolformaldehyde (RFF), melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) and polyurethane (PUR). The process of manufacturing the beams involved the classification of the parts, manufacturing of the finger joint, junction, assembly and pressing. The assays involved the assessment of structural properties of bending such as the Elasticity Model and Rupture. In the analysis of the average values for the variables, no significant differences were found for the glulam, however, for the I - joist, the superiority of the PUR adhesive was verified, based on the average value of the rupture model. In relation to the types and weights of the adhesives used, it was observed that the RFF adhesive needed a greater amount of the product to provide the mechanism of adherence, 500 g/m2. Two parameters made the PUR adhesive different in relation to the others: a 24 times faster healing time, making it more advantageous from the point of view of volume of production; and the shorter open time, which requires special procedures. The glulam beams showed higher mean values, but the choice of the beam model must be analyzed carefully, always taking into consideration the required resistance and the cost of the material to be used in the confection. A madeira sempre foi utilizada estruturalmente na construção civil na forma sólida, com baixo grau de processamento e inovação tecnológica e, muitas vezes, em outros componentes como em pisos, paredes e telhados. Entretanto, a mudança nos padrões adotados envolveu o aperfeiçoamento da tecnologia, bem como a mudança do conceito estético e funcional requerido nas construções. Dessa forma, surgiram as vigas estruturais em madeira como a Madeira Laminada Colada (MLC) e com Perfil em I que apresentam uma série de vantagens como à alta resistência em relação ao seu peso. O objetivo geral do presente estudo foi avaliar o efeito do tipo de adesivo sobre a resistência e rigidez de vigas estruturais de Madeira Laminada Colada (MLC) e com perfil em I de Pinus taeda. Os adesivos utilizados no experimento foram a Resorcina Fenol Formaldeído (RFF), a Melamina Uréia Formaldeído (MUF) e o Poliuretano (PUR). O processo de fabricação das vigas envolveu a classificação das peças, fabricação de emendas, junção, montagem e prensagem. Os ensaios envolveram a avaliação das propriedades estruturais sob flexão como Módulo de Elasticidade (MOE) e Ruptura (MOR). Na análise dos valores médios obtidos para as variáveis não foram encontradas diferenças significativas para as vigas de MLC, entretanto, nas vigas com perfil em I, verificouse a superioridade do adesivo PUR no valor médio do MOR. Em relação aos tipos e gramaturas de adesivos utilizados, observou-se que o adesivo RFF necessita de maior quantidade do produto para atender ao mecanismo da adesão, 500 g/m2. Dois parâmetros tornaram o adesivo PUR diferenciado em relação aos demais; o tempo de cura 24 vezes mais rápido, tornando-o mais vantajoso sob o ponto de vista de volume de produção e o tempo em aberto mais curto que requer procedimentos especiais. As vigas de MLC apresentaram valores médio superiores, mas a escolha do modelo de viga deve ser analisada cuidadosamente, levando-se sempre em consideração a resistência requerida e o custo do material a ser utilizado na confecção destas.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2010-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/185710.5902/198050981857Ciência Florestal; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2010); 345-356Ciência Florestal; v. 20 n. 2 (2010); 345-3561980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1857/1202Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff daMatos, Jorge Luis Monteiro deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-05T14:22:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1857Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-05-05T14:22:10Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES Rigidez e resistência de vigas estruturais de madeira laminada colada e com perfil I compostas por diferentes adesivos. |
title |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
spellingShingle |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff da glulam I – joist potential adhesives for beams. madeira laminada colada viga com perfil em I adesivos potenciais para vigas |
title_short |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
title_full |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
title_fullStr |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
title_full_unstemmed |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
title_sort |
BENDING STIFFNESS AND RESISTENCE OF STRUCTURAL GLULAM BEAMS AND I – JOIST COMPOSED OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVES |
author |
Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff da |
author_facet |
Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff da Matos, Jorge Luis Monteiro de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos, Jorge Luis Monteiro de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Alexsandro Bayestorff da Matos, Jorge Luis Monteiro de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
glulam I – joist potential adhesives for beams. madeira laminada colada viga com perfil em I adesivos potenciais para vigas |
topic |
glulam I – joist potential adhesives for beams. madeira laminada colada viga com perfil em I adesivos potenciais para vigas |
description |
Wood has always been structurally used in solid form in civil construction, with a low degree of processing and technological innovation, and many times in other constituents such as floors, walls and roofs. However, changes in the adopted standards involve the refinement of technology, as well as, changes of the esthetic and functional concepts required in constructions. Thus, structural wood beams, such as glulam and I – joist, have emerged, presenting a series of advantages such as high resistance in relation to weight. The general objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the type of adhesive on the strength and stiffness of beams of Glulam and I-joist of Pinus taeda. The adhesives used in the experiment were resorcinol-phenolformaldehyde (RFF), melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) and polyurethane (PUR). The process of manufacturing the beams involved the classification of the parts, manufacturing of the finger joint, junction, assembly and pressing. The assays involved the assessment of structural properties of bending such as the Elasticity Model and Rupture. In the analysis of the average values for the variables, no significant differences were found for the glulam, however, for the I - joist, the superiority of the PUR adhesive was verified, based on the average value of the rupture model. In relation to the types and weights of the adhesives used, it was observed that the RFF adhesive needed a greater amount of the product to provide the mechanism of adherence, 500 g/m2. Two parameters made the PUR adhesive different in relation to the others: a 24 times faster healing time, making it more advantageous from the point of view of volume of production; and the shorter open time, which requires special procedures. The glulam beams showed higher mean values, but the choice of the beam model must be analyzed carefully, always taking into consideration the required resistance and the cost of the material to be used in the confection. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1857 10.5902/198050981857 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1857 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/198050981857 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1857/1202 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2010); 345-356 Ciência Florestal; v. 20 n. 2 (2010); 345-356 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1799944126640160768 |