Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253 |
Resumo: | The dynamics of forest cover in the São Francisco River Basin (BHRSF) can be assessed by metrics of landscape ecology. The aim of this work was to evaluate the forest fragmentation of the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil, through metrics of landscape ecology, and the quantification of forest cover in federal conservation units (UCs) for the Caatinga, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes in the years 1997, 2007 and 2017. The mapping of forest fragments was calculated by the area and the quantity of forest fragments that were divided into the size classes: (1) small (up to 10 ha); (2) medium (between 10 and 100 ha); and (3) large (greater than 100 ha). The metrics were calculated in the Fragstats® 4.2 software, and three groups of metrics were used: area, shape and border. The metric fragment numbers (NP), class area (CA), average fragment size (MPS) and edge density (ED) of forest fragments from the Caatinga and Cerrado biomes at BHRSF prove that the Basin is in the process of forest fragmentation mainly in the large fragments, which had their areas reduced, and in those of medium size, which had an increase in the amount of edges. In general, the protection of forest areas in the Caatinga and Cerrado UCs is not effective in maintaining the forest cover, given the deforestation that has existed in these protected areas in the last 20 years. Measures such as payments for environmental services or forest restoration must be used by the government and society in conjunction with the creation and maintenance of protected forest areas. The Atlantic Forest was the only biome to show an increase in the forest cover and a decrease in the forest fragmentation at BHRSF. Initiatives such as the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact and the 2006 Atlantic Forest Law may have favored this increase in the forest cover. |
id |
UFSM-6_7589bcd6e779445f7b0ef5cb8677f43d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45253 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, BrazilFragmentação florestal na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco, Brasilgeoprocessamentodesmatamentoanálise espaço-temporalserviços ambientaisGeoprocessingDeforestationSpatiotemporal analysisEnvironmental servicesThe dynamics of forest cover in the São Francisco River Basin (BHRSF) can be assessed by metrics of landscape ecology. The aim of this work was to evaluate the forest fragmentation of the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil, through metrics of landscape ecology, and the quantification of forest cover in federal conservation units (UCs) for the Caatinga, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes in the years 1997, 2007 and 2017. The mapping of forest fragments was calculated by the area and the quantity of forest fragments that were divided into the size classes: (1) small (up to 10 ha); (2) medium (between 10 and 100 ha); and (3) large (greater than 100 ha). The metrics were calculated in the Fragstats® 4.2 software, and three groups of metrics were used: area, shape and border. The metric fragment numbers (NP), class area (CA), average fragment size (MPS) and edge density (ED) of forest fragments from the Caatinga and Cerrado biomes at BHRSF prove that the Basin is in the process of forest fragmentation mainly in the large fragments, which had their areas reduced, and in those of medium size, which had an increase in the amount of edges. In general, the protection of forest areas in the Caatinga and Cerrado UCs is not effective in maintaining the forest cover, given the deforestation that has existed in these protected areas in the last 20 years. Measures such as payments for environmental services or forest restoration must be used by the government and society in conjunction with the creation and maintenance of protected forest areas. The Atlantic Forest was the only biome to show an increase in the forest cover and a decrease in the forest fragmentation at BHRSF. Initiatives such as the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact and the 2006 Atlantic Forest Law may have favored this increase in the forest cover.A dinâmica da cobertura florestal na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco (BHRSF) pode ser avaliada por métricas de ecologia da paisagem. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a fragmentação florestal na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco, Brasil, por meio de métricas de ecologia da paisagem e quantificar a cobertura florestal nas unidades de conservação federais (UCs) presentes, para os biomas Caatinga, Mata Atlântica e Cerrado nos anos de 1997, 2007 e 2017. O mapeamento dos fragmentos foi realizado considerando área e quantidade dos fragmentos florestais, divididos nas seguintes classes de tamanho: (1) pequeno (até 10 ha); (2) médio (entre 10 e 100 ha); e (3) grande (maiores que 100 ha). As métricas, área, forma e borda, foram calculadas no software Fragstats® 4.2. As métricas números de fragmentos (NP), área de classe (CA), tamanho médio dos fragmentos (MPS) e densidade de borda (ED) dos fragmentos florestais dos biomas Caatinga e Cerrado na BHRSF comprovam que a Bacia está em processo de fragmentação florestal, principalmente nos grandes fragmentos, que tiveram suas áreas reduzidas, e nos de tamanho médio, que tiveram aumento da quantidade de bordas. De forma geral, a proteção de áreas florestais nas UCs da Caatinga e Cerrado não foram eficazes em manter a cobertura florestal, haja vista o desmatamento nestas áreas protegidas em 20 anos. Medidas como pagamentos por serviços ambientais ou restauração florestal devem ser utilizadas pelo poder público e sociedade em conjunto com a criação e manutenção de áreas florestais protegidas. A Mata Atlântica foi o único bioma a apresentar aumento na cobertura florestal e redução da fragmentação florestal na BHRSF. Iniciativas como o pacto da restauração da Mata Atlântica e Lei da Mata Atlântica de 2006 podem ter favorecido esse aumento da cobertura florestal.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-09-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/4525310.5902/1980509845253Ciência Florestal; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2022); 1227-1246Ciência Florestal; v. 32 n. 3 (2022); 1227-12461980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253/48980https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253/50941Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Milton MarquesLima, Alexandre Herculano SouzaWanderley, Lilian LinsFernandes, Marcia Rodrigues de MouraAraújo Filho, Renisson Nepomuceno2022-12-29T17:20:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45253Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2022-12-29T17:20:18Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil Fragmentação florestal na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco, Brasil |
title |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil Fernandes, Milton Marques geoprocessamento desmatamento análise espaço-temporal serviços ambientais Geoprocessing Deforestation Spatiotemporal analysis Environmental services |
title_short |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
title_full |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
title_sort |
Forest fragmentation in the São Francisco River Hydrographic Basin, Brazil |
author |
Fernandes, Milton Marques |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Milton Marques Lima, Alexandre Herculano Souza Wanderley, Lilian Lins Fernandes, Marcia Rodrigues de Moura Araújo Filho, Renisson Nepomuceno |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Alexandre Herculano Souza Wanderley, Lilian Lins Fernandes, Marcia Rodrigues de Moura Araújo Filho, Renisson Nepomuceno |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Milton Marques Lima, Alexandre Herculano Souza Wanderley, Lilian Lins Fernandes, Marcia Rodrigues de Moura Araújo Filho, Renisson Nepomuceno |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
geoprocessamento desmatamento análise espaço-temporal serviços ambientais Geoprocessing Deforestation Spatiotemporal analysis Environmental services |
topic |
geoprocessamento desmatamento análise espaço-temporal serviços ambientais Geoprocessing Deforestation Spatiotemporal analysis Environmental services |
description |
The dynamics of forest cover in the São Francisco River Basin (BHRSF) can be assessed by metrics of landscape ecology. The aim of this work was to evaluate the forest fragmentation of the São Francisco River Basin, Brazil, through metrics of landscape ecology, and the quantification of forest cover in federal conservation units (UCs) for the Caatinga, Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes in the years 1997, 2007 and 2017. The mapping of forest fragments was calculated by the area and the quantity of forest fragments that were divided into the size classes: (1) small (up to 10 ha); (2) medium (between 10 and 100 ha); and (3) large (greater than 100 ha). The metrics were calculated in the Fragstats® 4.2 software, and three groups of metrics were used: area, shape and border. The metric fragment numbers (NP), class area (CA), average fragment size (MPS) and edge density (ED) of forest fragments from the Caatinga and Cerrado biomes at BHRSF prove that the Basin is in the process of forest fragmentation mainly in the large fragments, which had their areas reduced, and in those of medium size, which had an increase in the amount of edges. In general, the protection of forest areas in the Caatinga and Cerrado UCs is not effective in maintaining the forest cover, given the deforestation that has existed in these protected areas in the last 20 years. Measures such as payments for environmental services or forest restoration must be used by the government and society in conjunction with the creation and maintenance of protected forest areas. The Atlantic Forest was the only biome to show an increase in the forest cover and a decrease in the forest fragmentation at BHRSF. Initiatives such as the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact and the 2006 Atlantic Forest Law may have favored this increase in the forest cover. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253 10.5902/1980509845253 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509845253 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253/48980 https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/45253/50941 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 32 No. 3 (2022); 1227-1246 Ciência Florestal; v. 32 n. 3 (2022); 1227-1246 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1799944135378993152 |