Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Adriano da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Folegatti, Marcos Vinicius, Fanaya Junior, Eder Duarte, Oliveira, Gabriel Queiroz de, Oliveira, Jean Carlos Lopes de, Brito, Kelvin Melgar Rosalvo, Rego, Norton Hayd
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949
Resumo: Since eucalyptus is a fast-growing plant, it offers advantages in comparison to other forest species, and the use of localized irrigation systems can increase yield and reduce time to cutting. The aim of this study was to evaluate two eucalyptus hybrids, growth in crop condition: irrigated and dry land, during the first year of development of the crop. The experiment was set up in April 2011 in the irrigation experimental area of the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the municipality of Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was use in split-plots, with four blocks and two replications within each block. Plots were composed of the irrigation treatments (drip, micro sprinkler and no irrigation), and the subplots were composed of two eucalyptus hybrids (Grancam and Urograndis). Evaluations occurred at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 days after transplant (DAT), measuring the height of plants and trunk diameter; and, thus, the volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency in water use in all the periods evaluated was estimated. Data were subject to analysis of variance and compared by the Tukey test at the level of 5% probability. It is concluded that at 360 DAT, the drip and micro sprinkler irrigations led to gains in biomass and carbon stock of around 190% as compared to eucalyptus without irrigation.
id UFSM-6_802ea0546e708fb2c666f9d94812a609
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47949
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptusVolume, biomassa, estoque de carbono e eficiência do uso da água em eucalipto irrigadoDrip irrigationMicro sprinklerGrancamUrograndisIrrigação por gotejamentoMicro aspersorGrancamUrograndisSince eucalyptus is a fast-growing plant, it offers advantages in comparison to other forest species, and the use of localized irrigation systems can increase yield and reduce time to cutting. The aim of this study was to evaluate two eucalyptus hybrids, growth in crop condition: irrigated and dry land, during the first year of development of the crop. The experiment was set up in April 2011 in the irrigation experimental area of the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the municipality of Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was use in split-plots, with four blocks and two replications within each block. Plots were composed of the irrigation treatments (drip, micro sprinkler and no irrigation), and the subplots were composed of two eucalyptus hybrids (Grancam and Urograndis). Evaluations occurred at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 days after transplant (DAT), measuring the height of plants and trunk diameter; and, thus, the volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency in water use in all the periods evaluated was estimated. Data were subject to analysis of variance and compared by the Tukey test at the level of 5% probability. It is concluded that at 360 DAT, the drip and micro sprinkler irrigations led to gains in biomass and carbon stock of around 190% as compared to eucalyptus without irrigation.Como o eucalipto é uma planta de crescimento rápido, oferece vantagens em comparação com outras espécies florestais, e o uso de sistemas de irrigação localizados pode aumentar o rendimento e reduzir o tempo de corte. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o crescimento de dois híbridos de eucalipto, em condição de cultura: terra irrigada e seca, durante o primeiro ano de desenvolvimento da cultura. O experimento foi realizado em abril de 2011 na área experimental de irrigação da Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, no município de Aquidauana, MS, Brasil. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados, com quatro blocos e duas repetições em cada bloco. As parcelas foram compostas pelos tratamentos de irrigação (gotejamento, microaspersão e sem irrigação), e as subparcelas foram compostas por dois híbridos de eucalipto (Grancam e Urograndis). As avaliações ocorreram aos 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 e 360 dias após o transplante (DAT), medindo a altura das plantas e o diâmetro do tronco; e, assim, foram estimados o volume, a biomassa, o estoque de carbono e a eficiência no uso da água em todos os períodos avaliados. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e comparados pelo teste de Tukey ao nível de 5% de probabilidade. Conclui-se que, a 360 DAT, as irrigações por gotejamento e microaspersão levaram a ganhos de biomassa e estoque de carbono de cerca de 190% em comparação com o eucalipto sem irrigação.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2022-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/4794910.5902/1980509847949Ciência Florestal; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2022); 1047-1060Ciência Florestal; v. 32 n. 2 (2022); 1047-10601980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMenghttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/47561https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/48569https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/50790Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Adriano da SilvaFolegatti, Marcos ViniciusFanaya Junior, Eder DuarteOliveira, Gabriel Queiroz deOliveira, Jean Carlos Lopes deBrito, Kelvin Melgar RosalvoRego, Norton Hayd2023-03-23T15:03:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47949Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2023-03-23T15:03:11Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
Volume, biomassa, estoque de carbono e eficiência do uso da água em eucalipto irrigado
title Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
spellingShingle Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
Lopes, Adriano da Silva
Drip irrigation
Micro sprinkler
Grancam
Urograndis
Irrigação por gotejamento
Micro aspersor
Grancam
Urograndis
title_short Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
title_full Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
title_fullStr Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
title_full_unstemmed Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
title_sort Volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency of water use in irrigated eucalyptus
author Lopes, Adriano da Silva
author_facet Lopes, Adriano da Silva
Folegatti, Marcos Vinicius
Fanaya Junior, Eder Duarte
Oliveira, Gabriel Queiroz de
Oliveira, Jean Carlos Lopes de
Brito, Kelvin Melgar Rosalvo
Rego, Norton Hayd
author_role author
author2 Folegatti, Marcos Vinicius
Fanaya Junior, Eder Duarte
Oliveira, Gabriel Queiroz de
Oliveira, Jean Carlos Lopes de
Brito, Kelvin Melgar Rosalvo
Rego, Norton Hayd
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Adriano da Silva
Folegatti, Marcos Vinicius
Fanaya Junior, Eder Duarte
Oliveira, Gabriel Queiroz de
Oliveira, Jean Carlos Lopes de
Brito, Kelvin Melgar Rosalvo
Rego, Norton Hayd
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Drip irrigation
Micro sprinkler
Grancam
Urograndis
Irrigação por gotejamento
Micro aspersor
Grancam
Urograndis
topic Drip irrigation
Micro sprinkler
Grancam
Urograndis
Irrigação por gotejamento
Micro aspersor
Grancam
Urograndis
description Since eucalyptus is a fast-growing plant, it offers advantages in comparison to other forest species, and the use of localized irrigation systems can increase yield and reduce time to cutting. The aim of this study was to evaluate two eucalyptus hybrids, growth in crop condition: irrigated and dry land, during the first year of development of the crop. The experiment was set up in April 2011 in the irrigation experimental area of the State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, in the municipality of Aquidauana, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. A randomized block experimental design was use in split-plots, with four blocks and two replications within each block. Plots were composed of the irrigation treatments (drip, micro sprinkler and no irrigation), and the subplots were composed of two eucalyptus hybrids (Grancam and Urograndis). Evaluations occurred at 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 days after transplant (DAT), measuring the height of plants and trunk diameter; and, thus, the volume, biomass, carbon stock and efficiency in water use in all the periods evaluated was estimated. Data were subject to analysis of variance and compared by the Tukey test at the level of 5% probability. It is concluded that at 360 DAT, the drip and micro sprinkler irrigations led to gains in biomass and carbon stock of around 190% as compared to eucalyptus without irrigation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949
10.5902/1980509847949
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509847949
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/47561
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/48569
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/47949/50790
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência Florestal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2022); 1047-1060
Ciência Florestal; v. 32 n. 2 (2022); 1047-1060
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944135721877504