PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Campagnolo, Karla
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silveira, Geraldo Lopes da, Miola, Alessandro Carvalho, Silva, Regis Leandro Lopes da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/28633
Resumo: The new Forest Code (NCF) which substitutes the Law No. 4.771, Old Forestry Code (ACF), regulates the definition of Permanent Preservation Areas (APP’s) of waterway marginal ranges, considering that currently their delimitation must be done from the edge of the regular bed rail (LR), differently from the ACF, which indicated the APP range beginning from the larger hydrological river bed (LMH). The objective was to compare the application of the NCF in river ciliary range, opposite to the Old Code, as well as the difference between themselves, in a typically rural basin. The Arroio Grande study case was used, the extent of the LR was defined, as well as of LMH and its respective APP range, thus, forming the Permanent Protection Range (FPP). Within each protection strip, it was utilized the land use analysis and also its commonest difficulties that define the boundaries of the APP defining bed. Through the maps which were obtained, the APP of the Arroio Grande must be 50m from the LR rail, which is bounded through this river, and includes river shores and islands. The NCF brings as a contribution to permit the owners the adequacy of degraded areas using a minor range of preservation and facilitating the definition of LR by satellite images. Thus, one can compare the laws through the maps and conclude that the NCF has brought some progress such as the ease of in the demarcation of APP, but it is milder compared to the size of the protected area.
id UFSM-6_99c8ba1f7f52e2469853dafe85d130f4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28633
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATIONÁREA DE PRESERVAÇÃO PERMANENTE DE UM RIO E ANÁLISE DA LEGISLAÇÃO DE PROTEÇÃO DA VEGETAÇÃO NATIVAriverbedPermanent Preservation Areaenvironmental legislation.leito de rioÁrea de Preservação Permanentelegislação ambiental.The new Forest Code (NCF) which substitutes the Law No. 4.771, Old Forestry Code (ACF), regulates the definition of Permanent Preservation Areas (APP’s) of waterway marginal ranges, considering that currently their delimitation must be done from the edge of the regular bed rail (LR), differently from the ACF, which indicated the APP range beginning from the larger hydrological river bed (LMH). The objective was to compare the application of the NCF in river ciliary range, opposite to the Old Code, as well as the difference between themselves, in a typically rural basin. The Arroio Grande study case was used, the extent of the LR was defined, as well as of LMH and its respective APP range, thus, forming the Permanent Protection Range (FPP). Within each protection strip, it was utilized the land use analysis and also its commonest difficulties that define the boundaries of the APP defining bed. Through the maps which were obtained, the APP of the Arroio Grande must be 50m from the LR rail, which is bounded through this river, and includes river shores and islands. The NCF brings as a contribution to permit the owners the adequacy of degraded areas using a minor range of preservation and facilitating the definition of LR by satellite images. Thus, one can compare the laws through the maps and conclude that the NCF has brought some progress such as the ease of in the demarcation of APP, but it is milder compared to the size of the protected area.O Novo Código Florestal Brasileiro (NCF), que revoga a Lei n. 4.771/1965, antigo Código Florestal (ACF), regulamenta a definição de Áreas de Preservação Permanente (APPs) das faixas marginais dos cursos d’água, sendo que atualmente sua delimitação deve ser feita a partir da borda da calha do leito regular (LR), diferentemente do ACF, que indicava o início da faixa de APP a partir do leito maior hidrológico (LMH) do rio. Objetivou-se comparar a aplicação no NCF em faixa ciliar de rio, frente ao antigo Código, bem como a diferença entre os mesmos, em uma bacia tipicamente rural. Utilizou-se como estudo de caso o Arroio Grande, definindo-se a extensão do LR, do LMH e respectiva faixa de APP, formando assim, a Faixa de Proteção Permanente (FPP). Dentro de cada faixa de proteção, foi realizada a análise do uso do solo e as dificuldades mais comuns encontradas para delimitação do leito definidor da APP. Por meio dos mapas obtidos, a APP do Arroio Grande deve ser de 50 metros a partir da calha do LR, que se trata da calha delimitada do rio, incluídas as praias e ilhas fluviais. O NCF traz como contribuição permitir aos proprietários a adequação das áreas degradadas com uma faixa menor de preservação e facilitar a definição do LR por meio de imagens de satélite.  Assim, podem-se comparar as legislações através dos mapas e concluir que o NCF trouxe alguns avanços, como a facilidade na demarcação da APP, mas é mais brando em relação ao tamanho de área protegida.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2017-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/2863310.5902/1980509828633Ciência Florestal; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2017); 831-842Ciência Florestal; v. 27 n. 3 (2017); 831-8421980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/28633/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampagnolo, KarlaSilveira, Geraldo Lopes daMiola, Alessandro CarvalhoSilva, Regis Leandro Lopes da2017-08-31T17:21:45Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/28633Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-08-31T17:21:45Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
ÁREA DE PRESERVAÇÃO PERMANENTE DE UM RIO E ANÁLISE DA LEGISLAÇÃO DE PROTEÇÃO DA VEGETAÇÃO NATIVA
title PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
spellingShingle PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
Campagnolo, Karla
riverbed
Permanent Preservation Area
environmental legislation.
leito de rio
Área de Preservação Permanente
legislação ambiental.
title_short PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
title_full PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
title_fullStr PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
title_full_unstemmed PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
title_sort PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREA OF A RIVER AND ANALYSIS OF PROTECTION LEGISLATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION
author Campagnolo, Karla
author_facet Campagnolo, Karla
Silveira, Geraldo Lopes da
Miola, Alessandro Carvalho
Silva, Regis Leandro Lopes da
author_role author
author2 Silveira, Geraldo Lopes da
Miola, Alessandro Carvalho
Silva, Regis Leandro Lopes da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Campagnolo, Karla
Silveira, Geraldo Lopes da
Miola, Alessandro Carvalho
Silva, Regis Leandro Lopes da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv riverbed
Permanent Preservation Area
environmental legislation.
leito de rio
Área de Preservação Permanente
legislação ambiental.
topic riverbed
Permanent Preservation Area
environmental legislation.
leito de rio
Área de Preservação Permanente
legislação ambiental.
description The new Forest Code (NCF) which substitutes the Law No. 4.771, Old Forestry Code (ACF), regulates the definition of Permanent Preservation Areas (APP’s) of waterway marginal ranges, considering that currently their delimitation must be done from the edge of the regular bed rail (LR), differently from the ACF, which indicated the APP range beginning from the larger hydrological river bed (LMH). The objective was to compare the application of the NCF in river ciliary range, opposite to the Old Code, as well as the difference between themselves, in a typically rural basin. The Arroio Grande study case was used, the extent of the LR was defined, as well as of LMH and its respective APP range, thus, forming the Permanent Protection Range (FPP). Within each protection strip, it was utilized the land use analysis and also its commonest difficulties that define the boundaries of the APP defining bed. Through the maps which were obtained, the APP of the Arroio Grande must be 50m from the LR rail, which is bounded through this river, and includes river shores and islands. The NCF brings as a contribution to permit the owners the adequacy of degraded areas using a minor range of preservation and facilitating the definition of LR by satellite images. Thus, one can compare the laws through the maps and conclude that the NCF has brought some progress such as the ease of in the demarcation of APP, but it is milder compared to the size of the protected area.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/28633
10.5902/1980509828633
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/28633
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509828633
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/28633/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2017); 831-842
Ciência Florestal; v. 27 n. 3 (2017); 831-842
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944132467097600