EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leal, Caio César Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Torres, Salvador Barros, Brito, Aldiclebson Augusto Fernandes de, Freitas, Rômulo Magno Oliveira de, Nogueira, Narjara Walessa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/24196
Resumo: Currently, it is aimed to use substrates composed primarily of organic waste in order to reduce costs with chemical fertilizer. In that sense, the experiment was to evaluate different types of substrates for the emergence and early development of seedlings of Cassia grandis L. f. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse at the Departament of Vegetable Sciences of Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), in Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. The substrates used were: sand + carbonized rice husk (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + wood dust (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + coconut fiber (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + chestnut bark (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1) and plant sand (control). The experimental design was a completely randomized design with 13 treatments (combinations of substrates), with four replications of 25 seeds and the means to test for Skot-knot (pr <0.05). We evaluated the following variables: plant emergence, emergence speed, plant height, root length and weight of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and total dry mass. According to the results, the substrate plant sand + sawdust (1:1) and plant sand + coconut fiber (1:3) showed higher values, providing better results in emergence, weight of the aerial part of the plant, length of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and root length. It was found that the substrate compounds sand plant and chestnut bark (1:3) is harmful to the emergence of seedling of Cassia grandis. 
id UFSM-6_adeec9ef84e09358c4938c37cb19d23a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24196
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATESEMERGÊNCIA E DESENVOLVIMENTO INICIAL DE PLÂNTULAS DE Cassia grandis L. f. EM FUNÇÃO DE DIFERENTES SUBSTRATOSCassia grandisseedsseedling production.Cassia grandissementesprodução de mudas.Currently, it is aimed to use substrates composed primarily of organic waste in order to reduce costs with chemical fertilizer. In that sense, the experiment was to evaluate different types of substrates for the emergence and early development of seedlings of Cassia grandis L. f. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse at the Departament of Vegetable Sciences of Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), in Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. The substrates used were: sand + carbonized rice husk (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + wood dust (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + coconut fiber (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + chestnut bark (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1) and plant sand (control). The experimental design was a completely randomized design with 13 treatments (combinations of substrates), with four replications of 25 seeds and the means to test for Skot-knot (pr <0.05). We evaluated the following variables: plant emergence, emergence speed, plant height, root length and weight of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and total dry mass. According to the results, the substrate plant sand + sawdust (1:1) and plant sand + coconut fiber (1:3) showed higher values, providing better results in emergence, weight of the aerial part of the plant, length of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and root length. It was found that the substrate compounds sand plant and chestnut bark (1:3) is harmful to the emergence of seedling of Cassia grandis. Atualmente, busca-se utilizar substratos constituídos, principalmente, de resíduos orgânicos, a fim de diminuir os custos com adubação química. Nesse sentido, o experimento teve como objetivo avaliar diferentes tipos de substratos para a emergência e desenvolvimento inicial de plântulas de cássia-rosa (Cassia grandis L. f.). O experimento foi conduzido em casa de vegetação do Departamento de Ciências Vegetais da Universidade Federal Rural do Semiárido (UFERSA), em Mossoró - RN, no período de abril a maio de 2012. Os substratos utilizados foram: terra vegetal + palha de arroz (nas proporções de 1:1, 1:3 e 3:1), terra vegetal + pó de madeira (nas proporções de 1:1, 1:3 e 3:1), terra vegetal + fibra de coco (nas proporções de 1:1, 1:3 e 3:1), terra vegetal + casca de castanha-de-caju (nas proporções de 1:1, 1:3 e 3:1) e terra vegetal (testemunha). O delineamento estatístico utilizado foi o inteiramente casualizado, com 13 tratamentos (combinações dos substratos), em quatro repetições de 25 sementes e as médias submetidas ao teste de Skot-knott (pr<0,05). Foram avaliadas as variáveis porcentagem e velocidade de emergência, comprimento da parte aérea, comprimento de raiz e massa seca da parte aérea, massa seca da raiz e massa seca total. De acordo com os resultados, os substratos terra vegetal + pó de madeira (1:1) e terra vegetal + fibra de coco (1:3) foram os mais apropriados, proporcionando melhores resultados em emergência, massa seca da parte aérea, comprimento da parte aérea, massa seca da raiz e comprimento da raiz. Por outro lado, verificou-se que o substrato composto com terra vegetal e casca de castanha-de-caju (1:3) mostrou-se inadequado para a emergência de plântulas de cássia-rosa.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/2419610.5902/1980509824196Ciência Florestal; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2016); 727-734Ciência Florestal; v. 26 n. 3 (2016); 727-7341980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/24196/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeal, Caio César PereiraTorres, Salvador BarrosBrito, Aldiclebson Augusto Fernandes deFreitas, Rômulo Magno Oliveira deNogueira, Narjara Walessa2017-04-06T11:07:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24196Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-04-06T11:07:47Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
EMERGÊNCIA E DESENVOLVIMENTO INICIAL DE PLÂNTULAS DE Cassia grandis L. f. EM FUNÇÃO DE DIFERENTES SUBSTRATOS
title EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
spellingShingle EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
Leal, Caio César Pereira
Cassia grandis
seeds
seedling production.
Cassia grandis
sementes
produção de mudas.
title_short EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
title_full EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
title_fullStr EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
title_full_unstemmed EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
title_sort EMERGENCY AND INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF Cassia grandis L. f. PLANTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES
author Leal, Caio César Pereira
author_facet Leal, Caio César Pereira
Torres, Salvador Barros
Brito, Aldiclebson Augusto Fernandes de
Freitas, Rômulo Magno Oliveira de
Nogueira, Narjara Walessa
author_role author
author2 Torres, Salvador Barros
Brito, Aldiclebson Augusto Fernandes de
Freitas, Rômulo Magno Oliveira de
Nogueira, Narjara Walessa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leal, Caio César Pereira
Torres, Salvador Barros
Brito, Aldiclebson Augusto Fernandes de
Freitas, Rômulo Magno Oliveira de
Nogueira, Narjara Walessa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cassia grandis
seeds
seedling production.
Cassia grandis
sementes
produção de mudas.
topic Cassia grandis
seeds
seedling production.
Cassia grandis
sementes
produção de mudas.
description Currently, it is aimed to use substrates composed primarily of organic waste in order to reduce costs with chemical fertilizer. In that sense, the experiment was to evaluate different types of substrates for the emergence and early development of seedlings of Cassia grandis L. f. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse at the Departament of Vegetable Sciences of Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), in Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil. The substrates used were: sand + carbonized rice husk (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + wood dust (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + coconut fiber (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1), plant sand + chestnut bark (in ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1) and plant sand (control). The experimental design was a completely randomized design with 13 treatments (combinations of substrates), with four replications of 25 seeds and the means to test for Skot-knot (pr <0.05). We evaluated the following variables: plant emergence, emergence speed, plant height, root length and weight of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and total dry mass. According to the results, the substrate plant sand + sawdust (1:1) and plant sand + coconut fiber (1:3) showed higher values, providing better results in emergence, weight of the aerial part of the plant, length of the aerial part of the plant, root dry mass and root length. It was found that the substrate compounds sand plant and chestnut bark (1:3) is harmful to the emergence of seedling of Cassia grandis. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/24196
10.5902/1980509824196
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/24196
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509824196
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/24196/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2016); 727-734
Ciência Florestal; v. 26 n. 3 (2016); 727-734
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944131171057664