ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
DOI: | 10.5902/198050981922 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922 |
Resumo: | Study of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used. However, to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index. As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as efficient as the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed. |
id |
UFSM-6_be6ec195195f42bd5dce33c4bd9dc712 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1922 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
spelling |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNAMétodo alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo.biological diversitymesofaunapitfall tramp.diversidade biológicamesofaunaarmadilhaStudy of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used. However, to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index. As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as efficient as the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed.Os levantamentos realizados sobre populações da fauna edáfica podem não mostrar diferenças de abundância de organismos por esbarrarem na dificuldade de instalação das armadilhas de coleta, rotineiramente utilizadas. Contudo, para uma maior praticidade de implantação e de determinação do nível populacional de organismos edáficos, foi avaliada uma metodologia alternativa à armadilha de Tretzel (modificada), o método Provid, para a coleta da fauna edáfica, proposto pelos autores deste trabalho. Os dois métodos foram instalados em nove diferentes áreas, com três repetições por método. As áreas diferiram quanto à localização, tipo de solo e cobertura vegetal. Os parâmetros avaliados para a população da fauna edáfica foram riqueza: abundância e índice de diversidade de Simpson. Diferenças estatísticas significativas não foram encontradas para os dois métodos de coleta de organismos edáficos entre as nove áreas analisadas para os parâmetros avaliados. Portanto, pode-se concluir que a metodologia de coleta da fauna edáfica pelo método Provid pode ser utilizada de uma forma tão eficiente quanto à armadilha de Tretzel modificada. O método Provid é prático e fácil de usar.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2006-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/192210.5902/198050981922Ciência Florestal; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2006); 407-417Ciência Florestal; v. 16 n. 4 (2006); 407-4171980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922/1164Antoniolli, Zaida InêsConceição, Paulo CesarBöck, ValídioPort, OdairSilva, Danni Maisa daSilva, Rodrigo Ferreira dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-15T11:51:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1922Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-05-15T11:51:16Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA Método alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo. |
title |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
spellingShingle |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA Antoniolli, Zaida Inês biological diversity mesofauna pitfall tramp. diversidade biológica mesofauna armadilha Antoniolli, Zaida Inês biological diversity mesofauna pitfall tramp. diversidade biológica mesofauna armadilha |
title_short |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
title_full |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
title_fullStr |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
title_full_unstemmed |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
title_sort |
ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA |
author |
Antoniolli, Zaida Inês |
author_facet |
Antoniolli, Zaida Inês Antoniolli, Zaida Inês Conceição, Paulo Cesar Böck, Valídio Port, Odair Silva, Danni Maisa da Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da Conceição, Paulo Cesar Böck, Valídio Port, Odair Silva, Danni Maisa da Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Conceição, Paulo Cesar Böck, Valídio Port, Odair Silva, Danni Maisa da Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antoniolli, Zaida Inês Conceição, Paulo Cesar Böck, Valídio Port, Odair Silva, Danni Maisa da Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biological diversity mesofauna pitfall tramp. diversidade biológica mesofauna armadilha |
topic |
biological diversity mesofauna pitfall tramp. diversidade biológica mesofauna armadilha |
description |
Study of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used. However, to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index. As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as efficient as the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922 10.5902/198050981922 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/198050981922 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922/1164 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2006); 407-417 Ciência Florestal; v. 16 n. 4 (2006); 407-417 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1822181488592945152 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5902/198050981922 |