Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/14521 |
Resumo: | New technologies in the area of computer networks have been gaining greater attention from academia and industry, such as Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). While SDN arose to make networks more programmable and flexible, the NFV paradigm has emerged with the primary goal of making network functions more scalable. Also, with virtualized network functions performed on generic devices, NFV enables expressive reduction of capital costs (CAPEX) and operations (OPEX). In this perspective, although network functions are implemented in both paradigms, the literature lacks in a deeper analysis of which network functions are more adequate to be executed in a given paradigm. In addition, in which scenarios and situations would it be more advantageous and appropriate to use an SDN or NFV paradigms to implement a particular network function. In this sense, this work presents a study on networks virtualization where it is observed which paradigm presents a better support to the needs of a given network function. To achieve this goal, the firewall, switching, routing and dhcp-server functions were implemented and tested in both technologies. There should be emphasized that the present research differs from the other works available in the literature, since its main contribution is a deeper analysis of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the functions of networks running in SDN and NFV paradigms. Analyzing the results obtained with the accomplishment of this work, it is noticed that the NFV paradigm is more suitable for the implementation of functions of the application category. For interoperability functions, SDN encompasses a more theoretical / practical basis, and therefore is understood to be the most adequate in this scenario. Regarding the implementation of functions that belong to the optimisation and monitoring / control categories, it is noted that the SDN and NFV paradigms can be substituted for each other, since they obtained similar results. As for the protection functions, it is verified that NFV obtained better results, therefore it is more advantageous and effective the implementation of functions of this category in this paradigm. Furthermore, the research results show that there is no single technology to implement a particular network function. From this perspective, it is understood that both paradigms can be applied to implement network functions belonging to different categories. |
id |
UFSM_01b6e0fb925f1b37520eb049b140fe55 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/14521 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2018-10-10T20:38:29Z2018-10-10T20:38:29Z2018-01-26http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/14521New technologies in the area of computer networks have been gaining greater attention from academia and industry, such as Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). While SDN arose to make networks more programmable and flexible, the NFV paradigm has emerged with the primary goal of making network functions more scalable. Also, with virtualized network functions performed on generic devices, NFV enables expressive reduction of capital costs (CAPEX) and operations (OPEX). In this perspective, although network functions are implemented in both paradigms, the literature lacks in a deeper analysis of which network functions are more adequate to be executed in a given paradigm. In addition, in which scenarios and situations would it be more advantageous and appropriate to use an SDN or NFV paradigms to implement a particular network function. In this sense, this work presents a study on networks virtualization where it is observed which paradigm presents a better support to the needs of a given network function. To achieve this goal, the firewall, switching, routing and dhcp-server functions were implemented and tested in both technologies. There should be emphasized that the present research differs from the other works available in the literature, since its main contribution is a deeper analysis of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the functions of networks running in SDN and NFV paradigms. Analyzing the results obtained with the accomplishment of this work, it is noticed that the NFV paradigm is more suitable for the implementation of functions of the application category. For interoperability functions, SDN encompasses a more theoretical / practical basis, and therefore is understood to be the most adequate in this scenario. Regarding the implementation of functions that belong to the optimisation and monitoring / control categories, it is noted that the SDN and NFV paradigms can be substituted for each other, since they obtained similar results. As for the protection functions, it is verified that NFV obtained better results, therefore it is more advantageous and effective the implementation of functions of this category in this paradigm. Furthermore, the research results show that there is no single technology to implement a particular network function. From this perspective, it is understood that both paradigms can be applied to implement network functions belonging to different categories.Novas tecnologias na área de redes de computadores vêm ganhando uma maior atenção da academia e da indústria, a exemplo de Redes Definidas por Software (SDN) e Virtualização das Funções de Rede (NFV). Enquanto SDN surgiu no intuito de tornar as redes mais programáveis e flexíveis, o paradigma NFV surgiu com objetivo principal de tornar funções de redes mais escaláveis. Ainda, com as funções de rede virtualizadas e executadas em dispositivos genéricos, NFV possibilita a redução expressiva dos custos de capital (CAPEX) e das operações (OPEX). Nessa perspectiva, embora funções de rede passaram a ser implementadas em ambos os paradigmas, a literatura carece de uma análise mais profunda de quais funções de rede são mais adequadas de se executar em determinado paradigma. Além disso, em quais casos, cenários e em quais situações seria mais vantajoso e adequado utilizar um paradigma SDN ou NFV para implementar determinada função de rede. Neste sentido, este trabalho apresenta um estudo sobre virtualização de redes onde observa-se qual paradigma apresenta um melhor suporte às necessidades de uma determinada função de rede. Para atingir este objetivo, implementou-se e testou-se as funções de firewall, switching, roteamento e dhcp-server em ambas as tecnologias. Ressalta-se que a presente pesquisa diferencia-se dos demais trabalhos disponíveis na literatura, já que tem como principal contribuição uma análise mais significativa dos aspectos qualitativos e quantitativos das funções de redes executando nas tecnologias SDN e NFV. Analisando-se os resultados obtidos com a realização deste trabalho, percebe-se que o paradigma NFV é mais adequado para a implementação de funções da categoria de aplicação. Para funções de interoperabilidade, SDN contempla maior embasamento teórico/prático e por isso entende-se que seja a mais adequada. No que tange a implementação de funções das categorias de otimização e de monitoramento/controle, nota-se que os paradigmas SDN e NFV podem ser substituídos um pelo outro, já que obtiveram resultados parecidos. Já para as funções de proteção, constata-se que NFV obteve melhores resultados, portanto sendo mais vantajosa e efetiva a implementação de funções desta categoria neste paradigma. Ainda, os resultados da pesquisa evidenciam que não existe uma única tecnologia exclusiva para ser implementada determinada função de rede. Tendo isto em vista, entende-se que ambos os paradigmas podem ser aplicados na implementação de funções de rede pertencentes a diferentes categorias.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de TecnologiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da ComputaçãoUFSMBrasilCiência da ComputaçãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSDNNFVVirtualizaçãoFunções de redeSDNNFVVirtualizationNetwork functionsCNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAOUma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redesA study about network virtualizationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisSantos, Carlos Raniery Paula doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0538173746410766Nunes, Raul Cerettahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7947423722511295Amaral, Érico Marcelo Hoff dohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2530535838251633http://lattes.cnpq.br/4713518772675005Marchesan, Gabriel1003000000076008ba54041-c946-4b50-840a-9567bb8512cf829bf1fe-2d5f-4a40-84b7-b501d1697a3457fafaae-aad3-4366-bce3-ab3e71704ade54efb6a8-f292-46bd-ac2c-01813082bf80reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-816http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/3/license.txtf8fcb28efb1c8cf0dc096bec902bf4c4MD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdfDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdfDissertação de Mestradoapplication/pdf1373861http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/1/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf1aead854c36b103edb6fb1cb89cd48dcMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8804http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/2/license_rdfc1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ffMD52TEXTDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.txtDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain232541http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/4/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.txtf686877255d62b97547ba186f76888b5MD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3850http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/5/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.jpg95ae2b8bee0e1585036ff6d7ef0a70beMD551/145212018-10-10 17:38:30.273oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/14521Q3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucw==Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2018-10-10T20:38:30Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
A study about network virtualization |
title |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
spellingShingle |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes Marchesan, Gabriel SDN NFV Virtualização Funções de rede SDN NFV Virtualization Network functions CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO |
title_short |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
title_full |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
title_fullStr |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
title_sort |
Uma análise comparativa entre paradigmas de virtualização de redes |
author |
Marchesan, Gabriel |
author_facet |
Marchesan, Gabriel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Carlos Raniery Paula dos |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0538173746410766 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Nunes, Raul Ceretta |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7947423722511295 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Érico Marcelo Hoff do |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2530535838251633 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4713518772675005 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marchesan, Gabriel |
contributor_str_mv |
Santos, Carlos Raniery Paula dos Nunes, Raul Ceretta Amaral, Érico Marcelo Hoff do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
SDN NFV Virtualização Funções de rede |
topic |
SDN NFV Virtualização Funções de rede SDN NFV Virtualization Network functions CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
SDN NFV Virtualization Network functions |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO |
description |
New technologies in the area of computer networks have been gaining greater attention from academia and industry, such as Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). While SDN arose to make networks more programmable and flexible, the NFV paradigm has emerged with the primary goal of making network functions more scalable. Also, with virtualized network functions performed on generic devices, NFV enables expressive reduction of capital costs (CAPEX) and operations (OPEX). In this perspective, although network functions are implemented in both paradigms, the literature lacks in a deeper analysis of which network functions are more adequate to be executed in a given paradigm. In addition, in which scenarios and situations would it be more advantageous and appropriate to use an SDN or NFV paradigms to implement a particular network function. In this sense, this work presents a study on networks virtualization where it is observed which paradigm presents a better support to the needs of a given network function. To achieve this goal, the firewall, switching, routing and dhcp-server functions were implemented and tested in both technologies. There should be emphasized that the present research differs from the other works available in the literature, since its main contribution is a deeper analysis of the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the functions of networks running in SDN and NFV paradigms. Analyzing the results obtained with the accomplishment of this work, it is noticed that the NFV paradigm is more suitable for the implementation of functions of the application category. For interoperability functions, SDN encompasses a more theoretical / practical basis, and therefore is understood to be the most adequate in this scenario. Regarding the implementation of functions that belong to the optimisation and monitoring / control categories, it is noted that the SDN and NFV paradigms can be substituted for each other, since they obtained similar results. As for the protection functions, it is verified that NFV obtained better results, therefore it is more advantageous and effective the implementation of functions of this category in this paradigm. Furthermore, the research results show that there is no single technology to implement a particular network function. From this perspective, it is understood that both paradigms can be applied to implement network functions belonging to different categories. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-10T20:38:29Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-10T20:38:29Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/14521 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/14521 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
100300000007 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
8ba54041-c946-4b50-840a-9567bb8512cf 829bf1fe-2d5f-4a40-84b7-b501d1697a34 57fafaae-aad3-4366-bce3-ab3e71704ade 54efb6a8-f292-46bd-ac2c-01813082bf80 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Tecnologia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Ciência da Computação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Tecnologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/1/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/4/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/14521/5/DIS_PPGCC_2018_MARCHESAN_GABRIEL.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f8fcb28efb1c8cf0dc096bec902bf4c4 1aead854c36b103edb6fb1cb89cd48dc c1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ff f686877255d62b97547ba186f76888b5 95ae2b8bee0e1585036ff6d7ef0a70be |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1801485334569025536 |