Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Matheus Dalbosco
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20801
Resumo: The research aims to analyze the relationship between wars and state capacity, in order to answer the following question: “What were the impacts of wars, which occurred in the imperial period, on the capabilities of the Brazilian state? To this end, the paper sought to test Centeno's (2002) hypotheses: (1) the extractive capacity was not expanded because the wars were financed with international loans; and (2) the wars in which Brazil participated were of the limited type and thus had minor impacts on state capabilities (limited wars produced limited states). The following wars were analyzed: The Cisplatin War (1825-1828), the War against Rosas (1852), and the Paraguayan War (1864-1870), defined as rivalry and limited war; opportunity and limited war; and total war, respectively. The interval is justified because it is the most bellicose phase in Brazilian history, allowing a more similar analysis of the bellicose model developed by Tilly (1996), and the different types of wars choosed allows the analysis of the second hypothesis. This is a single case study with multiple comparisons within the case and adopts the theoretical-methodological tool of path dependence. Finally, the study partially confirmed the first hypothesis, since the wars did not expand the state's extractive capacity and the high war costs contributed significantly to the country's debt increase. It is noteworthy, however, that the problem is not the use of international loans, but the inability of the Brazilian state to extract resources from its elites. The second hypothesis, that limited wars cause reduced impacts on state capacities, was not confirmed, because the different types of wars produced similar results.
id UFSM_0aa5605adc37b112c3167fa2b9eb9ad2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/20801
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperialWar and state building in imperial BrazilBrasil ImperialGuerraConstrução do estadoCapacidade estatalImperial BrazilWarState buildingState capacityCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIAThe research aims to analyze the relationship between wars and state capacity, in order to answer the following question: “What were the impacts of wars, which occurred in the imperial period, on the capabilities of the Brazilian state? To this end, the paper sought to test Centeno's (2002) hypotheses: (1) the extractive capacity was not expanded because the wars were financed with international loans; and (2) the wars in which Brazil participated were of the limited type and thus had minor impacts on state capabilities (limited wars produced limited states). The following wars were analyzed: The Cisplatin War (1825-1828), the War against Rosas (1852), and the Paraguayan War (1864-1870), defined as rivalry and limited war; opportunity and limited war; and total war, respectively. The interval is justified because it is the most bellicose phase in Brazilian history, allowing a more similar analysis of the bellicose model developed by Tilly (1996), and the different types of wars choosed allows the analysis of the second hypothesis. This is a single case study with multiple comparisons within the case and adopts the theoretical-methodological tool of path dependence. Finally, the study partially confirmed the first hypothesis, since the wars did not expand the state's extractive capacity and the high war costs contributed significantly to the country's debt increase. It is noteworthy, however, that the problem is not the use of international loans, but the inability of the Brazilian state to extract resources from its elites. The second hypothesis, that limited wars cause reduced impacts on state capacities, was not confirmed, because the different types of wars produced similar results.A pesquisa tem por objetivo analisar a relação entre guerras e capacidade estatal, de modo a responder à seguinte pergunta: “quais foram os impactos das guerras, ocorridas no período imperial, nas capacidades do Estado brasileiro? Para isso, o trabalho buscou testar as hipóteses de Centeno (2002), a ressaltar: (1) a capacidade extrativa não foi ampliada porque as guerras foram financiadas com empréstimos internacionais; e (2) as guerras em que o Brasil participou foram do tipo limitadas e, por isso, geraram impactos menores nas capacidades estatais (guerras limitadas produziram Estados limitados). Foram analisadas as guerras da Cisplatina (1825-1828), a guerra contra Rosas (1852) e a guerra do Paraguai (1864-1870), definidas como, respectivamente, guerra limitada e de rivalidade; guerra limitada e de oportunidade; e guerra total. O recorte é justificado por se tratar da fase mais belicosa da história brasileira, permitindo uma análise mais próxima do modelo belicista desenvolvido por Tilly (1996), e os diferentes tipos de guerras elencados permitem a análise da segunda hipótese. Trata-se de um estudo de caso único com comparações múltiplas dentro do caso e que adota o instrumento teórico-metodológico da dependência da trajetória. Por fim, o estudo confirmou parcialmente a primeira hipótese, uma vez que as guerras não ampliaram a capacidade extrativa do Estado e os altos gastos gerados pelos conflitos contribuíram significativamente para o aumento da dívida do país. Destaca-se, entretanto, que o problema não é o uso de empréstimos internacionais, mas a incapacidade do Estado brasileiro em extrair recursos de suas elites. Já a segunda hipótese, de que as guerras limitadas provocam impactos reduzidos nas capacidades estatais, não se sustentou, pois os diferentes tipos de guerras produziram resultados semelhantes.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilSociologiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências SociaisCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasDornelles Júnior, Arthur Coelhohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9604625080346874Perez, Reginaldo TeixeiraOliveira, Lucas Kerr dePereira, Matheus Dalbosco2021-05-06T17:41:21Z2021-05-06T17:41:21Z2019-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20801porAn error occurred on the license name.An error occurred getting the license - uri.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-05-07T06:00:53Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/20801Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2021-05-07T06:00:53Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
War and state building in imperial Brazil
title Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
spellingShingle Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
Pereira, Matheus Dalbosco
Brasil Imperial
Guerra
Construção do estado
Capacidade estatal
Imperial Brazil
War
State building
State capacity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
title_short Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
title_full Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
title_fullStr Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
title_full_unstemmed Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
title_sort Guerra e construção do estado no Brasil imperial
author Pereira, Matheus Dalbosco
author_facet Pereira, Matheus Dalbosco
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Dornelles Júnior, Arthur Coelho
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9604625080346874
Perez, Reginaldo Teixeira
Oliveira, Lucas Kerr de
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Matheus Dalbosco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brasil Imperial
Guerra
Construção do estado
Capacidade estatal
Imperial Brazil
War
State building
State capacity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
topic Brasil Imperial
Guerra
Construção do estado
Capacidade estatal
Imperial Brazil
War
State building
State capacity
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::SOCIOLOGIA
description The research aims to analyze the relationship between wars and state capacity, in order to answer the following question: “What were the impacts of wars, which occurred in the imperial period, on the capabilities of the Brazilian state? To this end, the paper sought to test Centeno's (2002) hypotheses: (1) the extractive capacity was not expanded because the wars were financed with international loans; and (2) the wars in which Brazil participated were of the limited type and thus had minor impacts on state capabilities (limited wars produced limited states). The following wars were analyzed: The Cisplatin War (1825-1828), the War against Rosas (1852), and the Paraguayan War (1864-1870), defined as rivalry and limited war; opportunity and limited war; and total war, respectively. The interval is justified because it is the most bellicose phase in Brazilian history, allowing a more similar analysis of the bellicose model developed by Tilly (1996), and the different types of wars choosed allows the analysis of the second hypothesis. This is a single case study with multiple comparisons within the case and adopts the theoretical-methodological tool of path dependence. Finally, the study partially confirmed the first hypothesis, since the wars did not expand the state's extractive capacity and the high war costs contributed significantly to the country's debt increase. It is noteworthy, however, that the problem is not the use of international loans, but the inability of the Brazilian state to extract resources from its elites. The second hypothesis, that limited wars cause reduced impacts on state capacities, was not confirmed, because the different types of wars produced similar results.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-09
2021-05-06T17:41:21Z
2021-05-06T17:41:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20801
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20801
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv An error occurred on the license name.
An error occurred getting the license - uri.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv An error occurred on the license name.
An error occurred getting the license - uri.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Sociologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1805922142562287616